View Single Post
      12-12-2009, 10:50 PM   #101
rzm3
Moderator
rzm3's Avatar
673
Rep
4,737
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (18)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rldzhao View Post
So what if it has turbo?!

The Ferrari F40 has twin turbo, and it is still celebrated as one of the most hardcore Ferrari ever built.

The Mclaren MP4 has twin turbo, and that revs to 8,500 RPM... while having the highest HP-to-CO2 ratio in the world.

The Nissan GTR has turbos, and NA GT3s are having a hard time catching it on the 'ring.

Come on, with technological advances, turbo does not nessesarily mean losing the true character of sports cars. With proper development it could be just as good.

Stop bashing BMW M just because it is putting turbos into their engines... this is a childish argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by e46e92love View Post
Finally someone who doesn't (no offense intended). Comparing a high revving turbo'd F40 to a low revving-turboed is comparing apples to oranges. Its not just the FI, its that its an FI engine, but that its some low-revving turbo.

Cheers,
e46e92
Sorry I have problem following your logic. I am simply saying that FI does NOT equal to 'boring' engine and car. That's it. And at this point how do you know that the M5/6 will have the same 7k redline as the X5/6?!
Appreciate 0