View Single Post
      11-29-2011, 10:38 PM   #16
Dave07997S
Brigadier General
723
Rep
3,965
Posts

Drives: 2020 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: El Segundo, CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superfly_M3 View Post
I don't know much about BMW's cams, but with previous experience high lift cams with Vanos/Vtec systems have more valve-blowby (or whatever the technical term is) ... when intake and exhaust valves are at one time both open.

This being said, Supercharging or turbocharging with high lift/variable timing cams was not recomended because the boost would blow by through the valves. This is old-school VTEC talk, maybe the S65 is so much more advance that this doesn't make sense now.

Anyways, IMO Cams are one of the last things you should do for the power/$$$ ratio.
GL
Agreed, cams should always be part of a package. I think more radical cams would require a increase in rpm to really take advantage of them. I have yet to see a set of cams that produced a reliable increase that was worth the expense.

The Schrick cams have been available for quite sometime yet no one is feeling froggy to jump at them.

Dave
__________________
2020 Ford Mustang GT 6MT PP1 444rwhp
(Sold)2013 M3 Coupe-MR/BLK ZCP, 2011 M3 Coupe-MR/Blk
2007 Porsche 997C2S Speed Yellow/Blk sport seats
2004 BMW M3 Imola/Blk
Appreciate 0