Quote:
Originally Posted by PencilGeek
I will get this fixed ASAP. I hate inaccurate information in the DynoDB.
I think what you're trying to tell me is that the 563 run was 91 only, and the 57x run was 91+water/meth...right? That's the problem, I just don't have a category in the DynoDB for water/meth. I can add one, but it will take some time because of the programming involved. So if I added a water/meth category to the DynoDB...wouldn't I also need to know what percentage is being used?
What about the cross pipe? Did you switch back to the Fabspeed cross pipe?
|
Thanks Robert. I sold the Encore Xpipe with HFC's, this was with the Gintani xpipe and 300 CEL HFC's.
My WM setup does not change AFR's, it is not an octane booster per se, but rather another "cooling" aid, and helps curtail possible heat soak, which is why I believe the car performs very consistently on the road, track and dyno, in back to back runs. The amount injected is not comparable to what some cars use as additional fuel or octane booster to run more boost/timing, i.e. the HPF E46 M3's, the boost was not raised 91 vs. WM on my setup. So I'm not sure what formula you use, this was the main reason I did a few dyno's on 91, so there would be no speculation about the WM.
