Quote:
Originally Posted by dcstep
I find errors by Claude in almost every case. He'll often grab just the easiest data to find. When I say, "I know that there must be such and such", he'll apologize, go get it and evaluate it, BUT... Someone in the process has to have deep knowledge.
|
My university just vetted & launched versions of Chatgpt & Claude for all faculty & staff to use. I've been messing around with it for a little over a week. It's wrong more than it's right on so many things. Then the "I'm sorry, you're right" or the best is when it argues with you, even though it's wrong. It take more time verifying the info it gives you than if you just researched it yourself.
Then you have students using it to write basic papers, which is blantently obvious. And I laughed yesterday when I received an AI-written email from a student (who happens to be a student that has submitted 2 AI-written papers already this Summer term). If it weren't a 6-week class, I'd have referred the student to Dean's Office for academic dishonesty already. I have a feeling that student won't make it very far.
Or, maybe Claude IS a student in my class...
