View Single Post
      07-11-2025, 11:49 AM   #80
jvictormp
Captain
jvictormp's Avatar
Brazil
1151
Rep
937
Posts

Drives: 2008 M3 E92 6MT
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Brazil

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamFODI View Post
Completely agree with the rest of what you said.

The "why not" is

1. More possible leak points

2. Filter has to be changed at some interval, and we don't know what that interval is; don't want to change too frequently because each change introduces a risk of leaks / dirt ingress, and don't want to change too infrequently because it might clog

Not saying it's a bad idea, but I'd want to make sure it actually did something worthwhile before adding it.

Can't say you're wrong on item 1, I've faced some undesired events here, although my method is different from NRW and quite unique, since I use additional fuel hoses and all events were hose-related. My fault on all of them.

Item 2 I see a little different, because your ballparking can be the totality of every other car in the world.

They all have similar change intervals, never more than 20.000km, never less then 10.000km. They all stand the risk of contaminants during the change, probably calculated as "irrelevant", otherwise there would be much to be told about "fuel filter change procedure", but instead it's just a plug and play service.

I've changed my method a little because of something I discovered, I'll detail in next post.
Appreciate 0