View Single Post
      01-19-2024, 02:43 PM   #56
M3SQRD
Major General
M3SQRD's Avatar
7938
Rep
9,881
Posts

Drives: 330G20,240F22,M3E92,F82,MCSR56
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mid-Atlantic

iTrader: (12)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanMpower View Post
That would have been sweet but I think the key to that high pitch “F1” sound is a forward placement double x, not at that rear.
What’s next, a tri or quad X design?

Yes, a single forward x-pipe design sounds great and usually outperforms a mid or aft X location by a significant amount. Dual X + dual resonators takes up most of the x-pipe mid section. It sounds ok. The best? Not sure. Curious to see the impact a multi X has on whp & torque as well as to see whether it causes a low rpm torque dip. Ideally, it requires dyno time to maximize engine tunes with this design - will this be limited to only a few tunes available for the e9x M3? Lastly, there’s the concern about quality and durability of this x-pipe. For example, the Turner Ti muffler fails badly when used on the track. You definitely don’t want an x-pipe littered with cracks! Personally, I’m not a fan of Ti with forced coloring as opposed to one that naturally colors itself with heat cycles like an full Akra Ti exhaust.
Appreciate 1
DRLane4387.50