Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelse92
Lol I just want to see some methodology and data behind the numbers. It all seems a little bit like arbitrary choices and based on "feel" of the car but some data on what works best or was a "faster" setup would be nice. If Bimmerworld or XYZ race team is running xxx rate/xxx rate with a certain setup with aero and everyone is copying that that's fine but I'd love to try to get more research and data behind it if possible. I know that the KW Clubsports came with either 515/800 (what I am running) or the later 628/685, and my 515/800 setup isn't really working right so there's definitely some tinkering to be done.
I've been trying to put some data together on my own setup to run some calculations and whatnot, but with work and life in the way I might just find it easier to do some of my own on-track testing on a few different setups over the next few weeks and go from there. Good news is it looks like I'll have the car out nearly every weekend in November so there will be plenty of data to be had.  |
I agree that data is the best form of convincing! I think the largest part is that I don't plan to run AERO and I plan to keep at the 200TW category of tires. I am very curious what you find out! 500/800 was originally what I was planning to get but for whatever reason I was convinced to 600/900. Who knows maybe it will be stupid and I'll end up back at 400/700 for the plush street ride.
Laguna Stancebois
