Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb
There is too much odd stuff with that dyno graph. Correcting from 288 rwhp to 383 crank hp is odd. Having more rear wheel torque than hp on a 4.0L V8 that revs to 8400 rpm is odd.
|
yeap. the operator employed a 1.33 conversion from rwhp to crank...
and yes to the higher rear wheel torque...really odd.