View Single Post
      10-05-2020, 06:58 PM   #27
Redd
Brigadier General
5039
Rep
4,842
Posts

Drives: 2010 BMW E92 M3 Dakar Edition
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Malaysia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgbimmer8888 View Post
Hmm I am confused. From my graph, I thought 383 is my crank hp, while 288 is my rwhp? Hence I felt that my rwhp is very Low compared to others.

Yes I agree the delta is important, but I was just concerned that my absolute rwhp was still very Low.

Could it be the correction factor that the operator used on the mustang dyno?

I am confident mine was a cf of 1.0.
Unless they took the engine out of the car, all dynos measure power/torque at the wheels, and then calculate crank numbers. Which means you can pretty much ignore the crank numbers since they are just estimates.

Your numbers don't look far off if they are in kW/Nm. In fact, they seem high. 288kW = 390rwHP and that's very high assuming the Mustang is a heartbreaker dyno.

But I would be most concerned about the smoothness of the curves. The S65 is known to have an absolutely flat torque curve between 3k - 7.5k. Yours spikes and dips in a manner that is not normal. Same goes for the power curve, you have a flat spot at 5.8k that's not normal.

Not sure who this tuner is but I would highly recommend you get a tune from a more reputable source.
Appreciate 0