View Single Post
      01-12-2020, 09:06 AM   #5
admranger
Retired Curmudgeon
admranger's Avatar
United_States
4232
Rep
5,357
Posts

Drives: '19 X3M40i
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhyary View Post
Tires Philosophy

Cheap is good and front and rear do not have to match.

While I don't expect to set lap times records, I don't know how slower it is from top speed. But I will find out :-)

Reference would be Hoosier R7 265/35/19 front, 295/30/19 rear. Best Laptime NYST 1:35.7. Cost $1521 a set with a coupon from trackdaytire.


For the majority of the trackdays I will be experimenting with tires on number of levels and using Aim, I am going to monitor performance and wear.

I am trying to focus on spending $200 per tire. Using eBay and used tires combination.

For alignment I am going to see what Front max negative camber I can get. Rears are on -2.0 and for now I'll stay on -2.0
Why? What issue are you trying to solve? More camber results in less braking force available. The rear of the E90 doesn’t need too much camber to work well.

I think the problem statement you’re trying to solve is: “what is the optimal camber at the rear of my car?” However, randomly throwing tires at the rear will result in random results. Each tire (e.g., R7) has a sweet spot for camber. Throwing tires, including mismatched compounds, on the car will lead to indeterminate results and likely, frustration.

Now, if your goal is to turn gas into noise; carry on.
__________________

'19 X3 M40 Carbon Black/Oyster, '21 X7 40i AW/Black, Past BMWs: '18 M550i, '18 330 GT, '16 X5 40e, '11 E90M3, '06 X5 4.4, '03 330i ZHP, '02 M3, '97 Z3 2.8, '96 Z3 2.8, '95 M3 (2x), '94 530i (manual), '92 525i (manual), '88 M3, '87 325iS
Appreciate 2
dparm3928.00
Exclusivs661.50