View Single Post
      08-05-2015, 01:27 PM   #13
///M Power-Belgium
General
///M Power-Belgium's Avatar
92185
Rep
31,414
Posts

Drives: ///M3-E92-DCT
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newb17 View Post
I want a noticeably louder exhaust than factory, all around. If there's some drone with the bypass, I'm ok with that. What I'm really wondering about is the volume difference between the 4 pipe and bypass. If there's very little difference, I'd go with the 4 pipe.
Between 4 pipe and bypass (ACM) is very little difference , almost none.
With the 2 big and all 4 perforated pipe replacement method, the Helmholtz chambers are still intact and functional .
Helmholtz chambers are designed by BMW and are anti-drone and unique because our Oem exhaust is a very good exhaust and also double walled .
With the bypass or ACM method the Helmholtz chamber function is deleted because the pipes going now straight through and so the exhaust will drone at low rpm's .
My thread because I've done this mod. by myself => http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=733817

There is also something like sound quality ..And for me personal the bypass sounds like a broken exhaust with lack of sound quality ,while the 2 big or all 4 method just sounds amazing .
In the video you can hear the 4 pipe method...

__________________
"MAX VERSTAPPEN" IS THE 2021+2022+2023+2024 F1 WORLD CHAMPION - #UnLeashTheLion -

BPM DEV-Tune & DCT Software-Tune & Servotronic & coding ///Alpine HID Angeleyes ///Oem.exhaust mod.
Appreciate 1