Your post brought nothing more to my brief analysis, neither did it invalidate anything. You started by a calumny attempt (that's classy), followed by taking a wild and completely unrealistic guess of only 1.25% (0.25 * 0.05) out of all occurrences having been reported on this forum.
On your allegation that i was unfairly representing scare tactic exaggerations in this forum. I'll respond to that. Finally you think rather arrogantly that you can take a condescending approach on me. You simply do not have the depth and analytical skills (as shown in your RB thread) for me to take you seriously any further.
"In your version, you assume that everybody who owns an m3 is on the forum. That's obviously a false assumption."
Absolutely not, I didn't make that assumption at all, much the contrary. Which goes to show you understood nothing of a simple and brief analysis.
Search this thread, you'll find one of those scare propagating guys saying an engine fail is reported daily on the forum. 89 months since m3 release = 2670 days. Let's first take your ridiculous 1.25% guess of reported percentage to normalize his scare number. 2670 / 0.0125 = 213,600 cars failed (LOL, there should be zero m3 left). Ok then use my more realistic guess number of 24% reported percentage. 2670 / 0.24 = 11,125 cars which would be 1 out of 5 cars produced.
Forgive me if i will not take further comments from you seriously, as it's mostly a waste of time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by regular guy
previous post.
|