Quote:
Originally Posted by nullrouted
I don't know -- I think you may fall into the 'haven't ever ridden in/driven one' category he was talking about. I had the opportunity to ride along in an ESS-VT2-585 M3 before purchasing my E92 and I must say it does kind-of 'suck' compared to the VT2 car, even with the 'small' kit the power difference is truly breathtaking. My only hesitation now is whether to ride it out for another year or so until the M4 is out and upgrade that, or spend the money now and take pretty huge depreciation on the kit when I sell it for the M4 in a couple years.
|
Just the statement alone that the base M3 "sucks" warrants criticism. If the only theory is that it sucks when compared to a supercharged version, then you aren't really comparing apples to apples.
E.g., your GT3 sucks because I have a Koenigsegg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tightie
I'm a complete tool but yet, I was one of the first S65 owners on this forum. I was the first supercharged M3 in the United States and I was the first or one of the first lowered compression motor supercharged M3s.
I guess I have no idea what I'm talking about and your right, 350rwhp is better then 500,650 rwhp.
|
I will modify my previous statement. You are not
just a tool, you are an idiot too. This response completely illuminates that considering that I couldn't have been clearer when I said that more horsepower is better than less horsepower. Not that I needed to state that. Because, you know, first grade math directs you to that conclusion.
Let me be the first to congratulate you (8 years late) on being the pioneer here. You are courageous and a great representative of all S65 owners to have ever walked on God's green earth. Thankfully, you discovered the supercharger, and further decided that the M3 was worthy of such a modification. Bravo, tightass, bravo.