Artemis wroteI remember that, the SC gave Max his first title. Someone called Latifi brought out the SC ...A final battle between Leclerc and Verstappen would have been a fitting end. But Verstappen admitted that he also already benefited from a SC/VSC situation in the past.
540.8KVIEWS
393REPLIES
1.1KAPPRECIATES
11-12-2025LAST POST
///M Power-Belgium wroteWith what I've heard from Mclaren there does seem a panic set up change to favour NOR, after PIA agreed a place swap at a previous race because of a pit stop anomaly for NOR (which PIA should never have agreed to, saying 'nothing to do with me') now McLaren have set the car basically to predominantly favour NOR which does seem like a f u Oscar. I can't see any other reason so the question is how this will this impact on MAX at Interlagos.
.
G30M wroteNah, the Stewarts usually let stuff side lap one turn one. Lewis created his own bad luck mid race by not following race directors instructions to take the paved runoff. Thus a fair penalty for gaining an advantage. The team didn't help matters by explaining the penalty wrongunluckiest driver today is Hamilton. got mugged by charles at T1 - you see, charles went on the grass to pass Hamilton, and nothing from the stewards then!
M5Rick wroteThe only changes I have seen were only made to Norris' car. Piastri tried and rejected the changes. Stella said there's no other changes coming for the rest of the year.With what I've heard from Mclaren there does seem a panic set up change to favour NOR, after PIA agreed a place swap at a previous race because of a pit stop anomaly for NOR (which PIA should never have agreed to, saying 'nothing to do with me') now McLaren have set the car basically to predominantly favour NOR which does seem like a f u Oscar. I can't see any other reason so the question is how this will this impact on MAX at Interlagos.
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/tech-weekly-the-ingenious-changes-mclaren-have-made-to-help-norris-re-find.3WYpLDUx9pBNKUvgHKrfhA
It's all submitted to FIA, so it would be public knowledge. Everyone's making things up to try to stir up the rumor mill. Probably my least favorite thing about F1. Last year it was getting Checo out of F1 and they succeeded only for everyone to eat their words. This year it's stirring up drama between Lando and Piastri that isn't needed. But it sure does get them clicks on their websites and videos, which is what they want.
statement from FIA: (they forgot about Liam Lawson)
“Following a Turn 1 incident, Race Control was informed that debris was present on the track at the apex of that corner. On lap 3, marshals were alerted and placed on standby to enter the track and recover the debris once all cars had passed Turn 1,” the FIA said.
“As soon as it became apparent that Lawson had pitted, the instructions to dispatch marshals were rescinded, and a double yellow flag was shown in that area. We are still investigating what occurred after that point.”
“Following a Turn 1 incident, Race Control was informed that debris was present on the track at the apex of that corner. On lap 3, marshals were alerted and placed on standby to enter the track and recover the debris once all cars had passed Turn 1,” the FIA said.
“As soon as it became apparent that Lawson had pitted, the instructions to dispatch marshals were rescinded, and a double yellow flag was shown in that area. We are still investigating what occurred after that point.”
G30M wroteFIA hasn't been handling these things all that well recently. Austin sprint race should have been red flagged instead of SC. No need to run like a quarter of the laps under SC, this isn't Indycar.statement from FIA: (they forgot about Liam Lawson)
“Following a Turn 1 incident, Race Control was informed that debris was present on the track at the apex of that corner. On lap 3, marshals were alerted and placed on standby to enter the track and recover the debris once all cars had passed Turn 1,” the FIA said.
“As soon as it became apparent that Lawson had pitted, the instructions to dispatch marshals were rescinded, and a double yellow flag was shown in that area. We are still investigating what occurred after that point.”
Then these two events in Mexico... pretty bad. Having two marshals nearly hit, then the very odd VSC at the end of the race... just poor decisions all around.
dfox wroteFia is creaking under the strain of the rules they've made but folk in teams are too scared to say anything as they'll be fined.FIA hasn't been handling these things all that well recently. Austin sprint race should have been red flagged instead of SC. No need to run like a quarter of the laps under SC, this isn't Indycar.
Then these two events in Mexico... pretty bad. Having two marshals nearly hit, then the very odd VSC at the end of the race... just poor decisions all around.
dfox wroteIt comes back to me now as in the article you enclosed, the stiffer thicker upperThe only changes I have seen were only made to Norris' car. Piastri tried and rejected the changes. Stella said there's no other changes coming for the rest of the year.
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/tech-weekly-the-ingenious-changes-mclaren-have-made-to-help-norris-re-find.3WYpLDUx9pBNKUvgHKrfhA
It's all submitted to FIA, so it would be public knowledge. Everyone's making things up to try to stir up the rumor mill. Probably my least favorite thing about F1. Last year it was getting Checo out of F1 and they succeeded only for everyone to eat their words. This year it's stirring up drama between Lando and Piastri that isn't needed. But it sure does get them clicks on their websites and videos, which is what they want.
wishbone for the more extreme king pin inclination of the 4 car. NOR was complaining at first that he was quicker but with no feel and could suddenly fly off the track.
M5Rick wroteYeah. So Norris does have a slightly different suspension on his car but Piastri was offered the changes and turned them down. Beyond that, there haven't been any reported changes to FIA. They both got a new PU in Monza. Piastri got a new chassis after his crash in Singapore - maybe there's some issue with it?It comes back to me now as in the article you enclosed, the stiffer thicker upper
wishbone for the more extreme king pin inclination of the 4 car. NOR was complaining at first that he was quicker but with no feel and could suddenly fly off the track.
Also curious if he's having issues getting the car set up. I saw at one point that McLaren stopped sharing some data between drivers. Earlier this season Jolyon Palmer noted that it was clear that Piastri was making gains by seeing where Lando was faster than him on track, but apparently that data flow has stopped.
dfox wroteLooks like Oscar will have to look at other ways for pace with his engineer.Yeah. So Norris does have a slightly different suspension on his car but Piastri was offered the changes and turned them down. Beyond that, there haven't been any reported changes to FIA. They both got a new PU in Monza. Piastri got a new chassis after his crash in Singapore - maybe there's some issue with it?
Also curious if he's having issues getting the car set up. I saw at one point that McLaren stopped sharing some data between drivers. Earlier this season Jolyon Palmer noted that it was clear that Piastri was making gains by seeing where Lando was faster than him on track, but apparently that data flow has stopped.
M5Rick wroteMark "Multi 21" Webber will enter the chat.Looks like Oscar will have to look at other ways for pace with his engineer.
///M Power-Belgium wrotePeter Windsor applauding the performances of Verstappen and Leclerc in Mexico, pointing out how Verstappen made the (very) best of a complicated car dynamics situation. Interesting.
Compare with Max The Machine back in 2022:
dfox wrotewow. each one for themself from now on. 4 races. anybody can win.
Also curious if he's having issues getting the car set up. I saw at one point that McLaren stopped sharing some data between drivers. Earlier this season Jolyon Palmer noted that it was clear that Piastri was making gains by seeing where Lando was faster than him on track, but apparently that data flow has stopped.
couple of inchidents
G30M wroteMAX could put this one on Charlie: neverbeen (Nurburgring)couple of inchidents
G30M wroteThe thing is we know that NOR has this more aggressive front suspension on as already described, and PIA hasn't, which required a different tub but he had this before at other tracks so why is he suddenly quicker here. It means they may have added on more upgrades which have not been disclosed yet as they should be to the FIA/stewards.wow. each one for themself from now on. 4 races. anybody can win.
M5Rick wroteIt’s called the Lando “Factor”.The thing is we know that NOR has this more aggressive front suspension on as already described, and PIA hasn't, which required a different tub but he had this before at other tracks so why is he suddenly quicker here. It means they may have added on more upgrades which have not been disclosed yet as they should be to the FIA/stewards.
He is getting the most out of the car.
Rono63 wrotetouchéIt’s called the Lando “Factor”.
He is getting the most out of the car.![]()
Rono63 wroteThanks for pointing out the irony.It’s called the Lando “Factor”.
He is getting the most out of the car.![]()
First time I've heard 'Lando factor' has it suddenly come on
True also. Atlhough I find Piastra the more talented driver, Norris certainly get's more out of the McLaren at the moment and is in a better form. I think he's going to take it in the end.