BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
PYSPEED
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-14-2014, 06:39 PM   #45
M3PO
Colonel
M3PO's Avatar
38
Rep
2,790
Posts

Drives: '08 IB E92
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: OC

iTrader: (7)

This is awesome!

DON'T put in the coated bearings! The S65 already has clearance issues and the coated bearings exacerbate the problem. Put in WPC bearings. Contact Tom @ EAS.
__________________
2008 IB E92 M3| BBS | KW | Arkym | Platte Forme A.G. | Active Autowerke | K&N | Fabspeed | Dinan | Evolve-R
Appreciate 0
      03-16-2014, 03:15 PM   #46
BetterLate
New Member
0
Rep
24
Posts

Drives: 09 JtB E92
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Very impressive! Subscribed and good luck with the build.
Appreciate 0
      03-16-2014, 05:33 PM   #47
kwality
Private
0
Rep
51
Posts

Drives: E92 aw m
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: nj

iTrader: (1)

AMAZING!

subscribed!!
Appreciate 0
      03-31-2014, 12:04 AM   #48
In33anity
Private
2
Rep
99
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bridgehampton NY

iTrader: (1)

Productive couple of weekends of work.

With the supercharger going into the S65, consensus was change the connecting rod bearings. As a 14, 600 mile engine (5/08 vintage), I thought I was doing so prophylactically. A friend who’s a BMW dealer tech came by to help. We couldn’t believe the bearings were totally shot. He’s bringing them to work to show the regional manager.



Replaced with the VAC Motorsports/Carillo teflon coated bearings and ARP bolts. VAC also did their baffle magic to the pan.









Picked up a genuine 1954 Bridgeport off Craigslist. Super tight and just in time! Although was surprised to learn no 230 neutral to my garage. An inverter and a trip from the electrician last week-end allowed me to mock up the alternator (March) and modifying the brackets to the Active Autowerke Level 2 SC kit.








Rotrex C38



Blower bracket extras!!!




But before I could mount the blower, I needed to chop out the driver’s side angle bracket up front to provide clearance for the tensioner and belt. I had already cut out the lower back-half of the X-brace and replaced with a crossmember. This time I opted for gussets.

Before



After



The modified Active brackets






Decided on the Chassisworks removable sidebar brackets and fabbed up the sidebars.





Ordered a fuel cell to drop down from FuelSafe. With the flanges was going to be tight to get in with the body rail across the back. Converted to a removable brace, adjustable with set screws to the correct height. Still need to clean up the sides.



Finally got in two hoops for the E-brake and shift linkage, Started milling a bracket for the linkage, but just ran out of time.

Appreciate 0
      03-31-2014, 12:11 AM   #49
Phanto///M
First Lieutenant
Phanto///M's Avatar
5
Rep
385
Posts

Drives: 08 E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Long Island

iTrader: (2)

Amazing work man. Thanks for the update!
Appreciate 0
      03-31-2014, 07:33 PM   #50
M3PO
Colonel
M3PO's Avatar
38
Rep
2,790
Posts

Drives: '08 IB E92
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: OC

iTrader: (7)

I guess you didn't see my warning about the coated bearings...
__________________
2008 IB E92 M3| BBS | KW | Arkym | Platte Forme A.G. | Active Autowerke | K&N | Fabspeed | Dinan | Evolve-R
Appreciate 0
      03-31-2014, 08:03 PM   #51
In33anity
Private
2
Rep
99
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bridgehampton NY

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3PO View Post
I guess you didn't see my warning about the coated bearings...
I do appreciate the heads up. Did make me rethink and go back and ask more questions. Awful lot of conflicting opinions out there. I've read all the threads, spoke to a bunch of different folks. Ultimately had to make a choice.
Appreciate 0
      04-01-2014, 02:12 PM   #52
jagman
Second Lieutenant
jagman's Avatar
United_States
3
Rep
235
Posts

Drives: 2008 Alpine White E92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sacramento, CA

iTrader: (0)

This is awesome! Looking forward to your journey!
Appreciate 0
      04-01-2014, 02:30 PM   #53
sterile stork
coupe la goon
sterile stork's Avatar
United_States
14
Rep
996
Posts

Drives: 2013 M3 Coupe, 2008 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PDX

iTrader: (16)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3PO View Post
I guess you didn't see my warning about the coated bearings...
Do go on....
Appreciate 0
      04-01-2014, 07:13 PM   #54
M3PO
Colonel
M3PO's Avatar
38
Rep
2,790
Posts

Drives: '08 IB E92
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: OC

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sterile stork View Post
Do go on....
Long story short, the S65 eats rod bearings because the clearances are too tight. The coated bearings further reduce the clearance and exacerbate the issue.
__________________
2008 IB E92 M3| BBS | KW | Arkym | Platte Forme A.G. | Active Autowerke | K&N | Fabspeed | Dinan | Evolve-R
Appreciate 0
      04-01-2014, 08:13 PM   #55
sterile stork
coupe la goon
sterile stork's Avatar
United_States
14
Rep
996
Posts

Drives: 2013 M3 Coupe, 2008 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PDX

iTrader: (16)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3PO View Post
Long story short, the S65 eats rod bearings because the clearances are too tight. The coated bearings further reduce the clearance and exacerbate the issue.
Thank you. I was able to track down your thoughts. Certainly valid!
Appreciate 0
      04-29-2014, 02:29 PM   #56
In33anity
Private
2
Rep
99
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bridgehampton NY

iTrader: (1)

I've been struggling with how to support all that extra weight of the Intercooler and custom radiator as well as the Grille in an aesthetically correct way as the FFR brackets are not close to up to the task. As going without hood, side panels and fenders, look was important. Finally decided needed to sit on a solid base. Bought a set of repro frame horns for a '32 Ford and I think I've settled on an old school look. Ignore the cardboard box simulating the IC and radiator.







Also managed to get the pulleys rearranged, and added one, to the Active kit to clear the frame for the blower as well as finished the mount for the shift linkage.



Appreciate 0
      04-29-2014, 11:16 PM   #57
Mike Benvo
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
Mike Benvo's Avatar
United_States
119
Rep
4,940
Posts


Drives: Harrop SC M3 / E46 M3 / 7Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (7)

Garage List
2014 BMW M5  [0.00]
2008 BMW M3  [5.00]
1990 BMW 735i Turbo  [5.00]
2004 BMW M3  [0.00]
Send a message via Skype™ to Mike Benvo
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3PO
Quote:
Originally Posted by sterile stork View Post
Do go on....
Long story short, the S65 eats rod bearings because the clearances are too tight. The coated bearings further reduce the clearance and exacerbate the issue.
Have measurements been taken of the coated newer bearings vs the previous stock bearings?
__________________

-----| Like us on Facebook | Instagram || Tuning Information | Remote Coding |-----
----Visit us at www.BPMSport.com - Emotion. Driven. | Toll Free: (888) 557-5133----
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2014, 03:18 AM   #58
SenorFunkyPants
Colonel
SenorFunkyPants's Avatar
United Kingdom
59
Rep
2,903
Posts

Drives: E92 DCT M3
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Its worth noting:
Clevite would call that rod bearing wear normal....The lead layer is extremely thin and the copper layer is not exposed.
The revised rod bearings with the slightly larger clearance statistically show no benefit in failure rate.
The coatings on these treated (assumed to be the revised version) bearing shells is extremely thin and will simply wear away with any contact.
__________________
Appreciate 1
      04-30-2014, 08:05 AM   #59
BMRLVR
Grease Monkey
BMRLVR's Avatar
Canada
44
Rep
2,374
Posts

Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorFunkyPants
Its worth noting:
Clevite would call that rod bearing wear normal....The lead layer is extremely thin and the copper layer is not exposed.
The revised rod bearings with the slightly larger clearance statistically show no benefit in failure rate.
The coatings on these treated (assumed to be the revised version) bearing shells is extremely thin and will simply wear away with any contact.
I don't think that with the limited mileage on that engine that the wear could be called normal. If the engine had 60,000 or 100,000 miles on it then you could call it normal.
__________________
2011 E90 M3 ZCP - Individual Moonstone/Individual Amarone Extended/Individual Piano Black With Inlay:LINK!!!
1994 Euro E36 M3 Sedan - Daytona Violet/Mulberry:LINK!!!
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2014, 09:10 AM   #60
SenorFunkyPants
Colonel
SenorFunkyPants's Avatar
United Kingdom
59
Rep
2,903
Posts

Drives: E92 DCT M3
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMRLVR View Post
I don't think that with the limited mileage on that engine that the wear could be called normal. If the engine had 60,000 or 100,000 miles on it then you could call it normal.
The (non supercharged) rod bearings that Clevite reported on in the bearing thread had ~30K miles.
The wear pattern on those looked worse than the ones in this thread.
They are certainly not "totally shot".
__________________
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2014, 11:24 AM   #61
M3Carbon
Captain
M3Carbon's Avatar
United_States
13
Rep
752
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 M3, AW/FRE
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: DC

iTrader: (1)

Great thread. Actually cannot believe I did not see this earlier. I've always loved FFR cars and always dreamed of their Roadster (Cobra) with an S65.

Good luck OP! Subscribed for updates.
__________________

Instagram @m3carbon
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2014, 11:39 AM   #62
regular guy
Lieutenant Colonel
regular guy's Avatar
77
Rep
1,629
Posts

Drives: Sprint car
Join Date: May 2013
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Benvo View Post
Have measurements been taken of the coated newer bearings vs the previous stock bearings?
Yes and no. Thickness measurements: yes, but installed in a connecting rod: no. The thickness measurements of two bearings are on page-1 of the bearing wiki thread. I have a complete set of coated bearings, but haven't made the time to measure them installed in connecting rods.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorFunkyPants View Post
Its worth noting:
Clevite would call that rod bearing wear normal....The lead layer is extremely thin and the copper layer is not exposed.
The revised rod bearings with the slightly larger clearance statistically show no benefit in failure rate.
The coatings on these treated (assumed to be the revised version) bearing shells is extremely thin and will simply wear away with any contact.
When looked as a static measurement like "thickness" then yes 0.0002-0.0004 inch is extremely thin. But when looked as a percentage of available clearance, it's extremely thick. The saving grace here are the newer 702/703 bearings have slightly increased clearance. Just by the numbers (not measurements), nominal thickness of the coating is 0.00031 inch. On a nominal clearance of 0.00165, that's a 19% reduction in clearance on the 702/703 bearings.

It looks like this discussion won't go away and I'll need to measure the coated bearings and post the results in the bearing wiki thread.

OP: Please keep the updates coming. I promise I'll get back to your PM regarding cams...I just haven't made the phone calls yet.

Last edited by regular guy; 04-30-2014 at 11:48 AM.
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2014, 07:44 PM   #63
BMRLVR
Grease Monkey
BMRLVR's Avatar
Canada
44
Rep
2,374
Posts

Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorFunkyPants
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMRLVR View Post
I don't think that with the limited mileage on that engine that the wear could be called normal. If the engine had 60,000 or 100,000 miles on it then you could call it normal.
The (non supercharged) rod bearings that Clevite reported on in the bearing thread had ~30K miles.
The wear pattern on those looked worse than the ones in this thread.
They are certainly not "totally shot".
No doubt they are far from totally shot, and would probably last quite a while longer. At the mileage on that engine the wear is significant though!
__________________
2011 E90 M3 ZCP - Individual Moonstone/Individual Amarone Extended/Individual Piano Black With Inlay:LINK!!!
1994 Euro E36 M3 Sedan - Daytona Violet/Mulberry:LINK!!!
Appreciate 0
      05-01-2014, 12:50 AM   #64
Hujan
Colonel
United_States
44
Rep
2,351
Posts

Drives: 2013 E92 M3; 2010 Z4 35i
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: San Diego, CA

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by regular guy View Post
Yes and no. Thickness measurements: yes, but installed in a connecting rod: no. The thickness measurements of two bearings are on page-1 of the bearing wiki thread. I have a complete set of coated bearings, but haven't made the time to measure them installed in connecting rods.



When looked as a static measurement like "thickness" then yes 0.0002-0.0004 inch is extremely thin. But when looked as a percentage of available clearance, it's extremely thick. The saving grace here are the newer 702/703 bearings have slightly increased clearance. Just by the numbers (not measurements), nominal thickness of the coating is 0.00031 inch. On a nominal clearance of 0.00165, that's a 19% reduction in clearance on the 702/703 bearings.

It looks like this discussion won't go away and I'll need to measure the coated bearings and post the results in the bearing wiki thread.

OP: Please keep the updates coming. I promise I'll get back to your PM regarding cams...I just haven't made the phone calls yet.
Why take the risk? Do coated bearings offer any advantage over the WPC treated ones that it's worth taking the risk of using a bearing that, at least measured off the rod, is thicker than the OEM ones?
Appreciate 0
      05-11-2014, 03:56 PM   #65
In33anity
Private
2
Rep
99
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bridgehampton NY

iTrader: (1)

Fuel cell in for mock-up. Need to get a rubber gasket for under the flange.





Also managed to get the oil block finished and mounted to remote the filter and, but for spacers, which is waiting on pulley arrival, alternator bracket finished too.

Appreciate 0
      05-11-2014, 04:39 PM   #66
regular guy
Lieutenant Colonel
regular guy's Avatar
77
Rep
1,629
Posts

Drives: Sprint car
Join Date: May 2013
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by In33anity View Post
Fuel cell in for mock-up. Need to get a rubber gasket for under the flange.





Also managed to get the oil block finished and mounted to remote the filter and, but for spacers, which is waiting on pulley arrival, alternator bracket finished too.

You do very nice work. Keep the pictures coming.

Got any more info about the fuel cell? How many pumps? What pump(s)? What pressure? With or without return? With or without fuel pressure regulator?
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 PM.




m3post
m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST