BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > General M3 Forum (E90 + E92 + E93)
 
ESS Tuning
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-23-2007, 03:11 PM   #23
alpineweissM3
I love my beautiful wife!
 
Drives: e90 ///M
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pittsburgh

Posts: 630
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucid View Post
I don't need pricing to know that I dislike the look of the navigation hump, and that I will never ever use navigation in Boston.
Agreed; the hump does look terrible. Not to mention the fact that I simply do not need all the extra stuff that comes with the NAV / I / M Drive package. I'm glad I'm not paying for it with the "standard" package.
alpineweissM3 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 03:21 PM   #24
lucid
Major General
 
lucid's Avatar
 
Drives: E30 M3; Expedition
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA

Posts: 8,034
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lvwirelessguy View Post
You guys pay ALOT more because you get a smaller percentage of the M3s that are produced, and that also affords you the right to personalize your car more to your liking than we can here. We dont have nearly as many options available to us in The USA, and we will never be able to take advantage of BMW Individual either
I live in Boston, so I am a part of the "we" in your post. M3 sales will be split 50/50 US vs. the rest of the world, so not sure what you mean with regards to volume. Since they can do it for Germans, the M3 manufacturing line must be able handle the customized production variables. It is true that there would be an incremental cost associated with allowing US customers to customize as well, but it would be small, and I'd be willing to pay for it, and I suspect so would many others. The option packages have to do with how the majority of the US consumers purchase cars--what kind of a decision process they go though.
lucid is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 03:26 PM   #25
alpineweissM3
I love my beautiful wife!
 
Drives: e90 ///M
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pittsburgh

Posts: 630
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davo2003 View Post
I'm an enthusiast, but also a realist. For 2009 or 2010 MY the M3 will get more ponies by way of turbocharging or a V10 (if it fits).
Turbocharging - doubtful. The M division has made it clear that they do not believe in FI. Although, that was BMW's corporate stance for quite some time.

V10 - Will NEVER happen.
alpineweissM3 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 03:28 PM   #26
lvwirelessguy
Captain
 
Drives: 2011 E92 M3, 2012 Golf TDI
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 702

Posts: 947
iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2005 M3  [0.00]
Send a message via Yahoo to lvwirelessguy
The USA gets alot more M3's than Germany.
lvwirelessguy is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 03:31 PM   #27
lucid
Major General
 
lucid's Avatar
 
Drives: E30 M3; Expedition
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA

Posts: 8,034
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lvwirelessguy View Post
The USA gets alot more M3's than Germany.
Germany is not the only country with many options choices. I don't know the exact distribution, but we know for a fact that other European countries have access to a long list of options as well. This would be interesting to find out...If I remember correctly ~25% of the production will be sold in Germany. South, is that correct?
lucid is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 04:24 PM   #28
kishg
Private First Class
 
Drives: 2003 540i/6
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northern NJ

Posts: 187
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lvwirelessguy View Post
Get over it, BMW is not FORCING you to do anything. If you want the M3 thats how it comes, take it or leave it.
we all know it's take it or leave it but that doesn't mean we can't complain about it. I think the way they bundled these options doesnt make much sense. Looks like if i order this car with the options i want, then it's pretty much going to have to be ZPP, ZTP, Sat radio, Ipod adapter, and maybe premium sound (might as well since to get premium sound you either need to order standalone nav or ztp which comes with nav). So now we have an ordering guide, how about some price info? Spoke to my dealer today and she said orders would be placed in jan and cars would roll off lots in feb/march.
__________________
'05 X5/3.0 Sport (E53)
'03 540i/6 M-Sport (E39)
'91 325i/5 Sport Package (E30)
BMWCCA #360858 SCCA# 374179 NASA # 128290
kishg is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 04:35 PM   #29
swamp2
Lieutenant General
 
swamp2's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Posts: 10,201
iTrader: (1)

Production

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucid View Post
Germany is not the only country with many options choices. I don't know the exact distribution, but we know for a fact that other European countries have access to a long list of options as well. This would be interesting to find out...If I remember correctly ~25% of the production will be sold in Germany. South, is that correct?
For the E46 M3 total production coupe+conv. was:

EU LHD: 20860
EU RHD: 19744
NA: 43779
Total :84383 (CSL not included)

Since most NA cars went to the US but EU except UK is almost exclusively RHD I would say it is a good estimate that the E92 M3 volume in Germany will be about 25% of the US volume but more like 10% of the total volume. In other words assume Germany got a bit over 50% of the total EU volume. This is probably a reasonable to upper limit.
swamp2 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 05:45 PM   #30
remmib
General
 
remmib's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 F10 520d M-Sport
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Norway

Posts: 26,159
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ilron View Post
Just my .02 kr.
LOL @ kr. HEHE når eg såg kr lo eg godt
__________________

F10 520d M-Sport Alpine White | HRE P43SC 20x9+20x11 | Michelin PSS 255/35+295/30 | KW V3 Coilover | M5 Front Sway Bar + M550d Rear Sway Bar | 3D Design Front Lip | BMW M Performance CF Spoiler | BMW M Performance Diffuser | BMW M Performance Black Grills | BMW M Performance Pedals |
remmib is offline   Norway
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 07:32 PM   #31
aequitas330
Montego Blue FTW
 
aequitas330's Avatar
 
Drives: Montego Blue e90 328xi
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northeast

Posts: 1,110
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lvwirelessguy View Post
Gotta love how they spin things
__________________
Sig designed by Nikki:

aequitas330 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 08:14 PM   #32
GregMM
Private
 
Drives: 2005 E46 M3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada

Posts: 54
iTrader: (0)

[quote=Davo2003;1581287]I'm an enthusiast, but also a realist. For 2009 or 2010 MY the M3 will get more ponies by way of turbocharging or a V10 (if it fits). QUOTE]

A realist and prophet: BMW has never up-rated an engine in an M car in the middle of a MY before. What makes you think they would do it with the E92?
GregMM is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 09:19 PM   #33
lucid
Major General
 
lucid's Avatar
 
Drives: E30 M3; Expedition
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA

Posts: 8,034
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregMM View Post
A realist and prophet: BMW has never up-rated an engine in an M car in the middle of a MY before. What makes you think they would do it with the E92?
Hmmmm...BMW has increased displacement twice before for the M3 within the same model/platform.
lucid is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 10:12 PM   #34
GregMM
Private
 
Drives: 2005 E46 M3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada

Posts: 54
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucid View Post
Hmmmm...BMW has increased displacement twice before for the M3 within the same model/platform.
well...if you're talking about the E36 and the euro spec difference that's not quite the same. Which model and platform are you thinking of?
GregMM is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 10:14 PM   #35
danielbreese
Private First Class
 
Drives: 11 1M, 02 M3, 67 Ferrari
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia

Posts: 157
iTrader: (0)

Guys,

Thanks for the replies and thank you

ilron and mkoesel for going into the specifics of the feeling of the different settings.

Just thinking out loud: In order to buy an M3 without ZTP, the car should have:

1 the steering set at the heaviest setting-- an unknown right now
2 The non EDC set at sport (or maybe normal)-- an unknown right now
3 The DSC when ON should be NO more intrusive than the E46 M3 DSC-- ILRON- Is that your impression?
4 The "sport" setting on the throttle should be at least as quick as the E46. I really like the hair trigger response of my E46 and I wonder if I will be missing something without the Sport plus-- ILRON?

I really dont to buy the "stripper" M3 only to find out later that I didnt go the extra yard to get the sportiest version. So unless all the above are true, I may have to suck it up and get ZTP.

Thanks,

Dan
danielbreese is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 10:28 PM   #36
GregMM
Private
 
Drives: 2005 E46 M3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada

Posts: 54
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucid View Post
Hmmmm...BMW has increased displacement twice before for the M3 within the same model/platform.
Ok...should not have said "never" They did it with the E36 but they added some new tech and increased displacement a little to get the E36 to 321hp. Not quite like adding 2 more cylinders though, or a turbo or many of the other things hoped for.

I stand corrected though
GregMM is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-23-2007, 10:36 PM   #37
Smoltz
Lieutenant
 
Drives: 04 Challenge Stradale + 02 M3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Live Free or Die

Posts: 464
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucid View Post
What are you talking about exactly? That's not how it comes in Germany. Why should it come that way in the US? Have you seen the German options list? Because of people like you who are willing to take anything BMW decides to push our way, the US market has become what it is, and we are forced to make choices that don't make sense. I guess it is not BMW's fault actually; US consumers do not seem to have the patience or whatever it takes to go through an options list and decide for themselves, or they have the tendency to puchase cars off the lot or something like that...
If I read correctly, you are implying that MDrive is available without iDrive in Germany. That is not the case.

Go to the bmw.de configurator and try it for yourself. You will see that selecting M Drive Requires Addition of "Business Navigation System"

-Adam
Smoltz is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-24-2007, 12:20 AM   #38
swamp2
Lieutenant General
 
swamp2's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Posts: 10,201
iTrader: (1)

Confused on EDC

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielbreese View Post
Guys,

Thanks for the replies and thank you

ilron and mkoesel for going into the specifics of the feeling of the different settings.

Just thinking out loud: In order to buy an M3 without ZTP, the car should have:

1 the steering set at the heaviest setting-- an unknown right now
2 The non EDC set at sport (or maybe normal)-- an unknown right now
3 The DSC when ON should be NO more intrusive than the E46 M3 DSC-- ILRON- Is that your impression?
4 The "sport" setting on the throttle should be at least as quick as the E46. I really like the hair trigger response of my E46 and I wonder if I will be missing something without the Sport plus-- ILRON?

I really dont to buy the "stripper" M3 only to find out later that I didnt go the extra yard to get the sportiest version. So unless all the above are true, I may have to suck it up and get ZTP.

Thanks,

Dan
1&4: TBD only in a comparison directly between two differently equipped cars will we have an answer.
2. Non EDC cars have no equivalent to EDC (active vs. passive systems) except that EDC in sport mode should be able to be duplicated with a non EDC system because it's normal active control (in comfort and normal modes) is entirely disabled (i.e. changed from active to passive) when set in sport mode. I think we have heard that the suspension in non EDC equipped cars is not nearly as harsh as is it in sport mode in EDC equipped cars.
3. DSC on but not in M Dynamic Mode will probably be quite similar to "DSC on" in the E46 M3. But MDM will have little similarity to "DSC on" in the E46 M3. This has been discussed in video reviews. MDM really lets you drive hard, accelerate hard and drift a small bit in corners - all allowing significant wheel slip. The E46 M3 with DSC on was much more restrictive and intrusive.
swamp2 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      10-24-2007, 03:03 AM   #39
enigma
Captain
 
Drives: E92 M3 and Elise
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Land of the Microchip

Posts: 689
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielbreese View Post
4 The "sport" setting on the throttle should be at least as quick as the E46. I really like the hair trigger response of my E46 and I wonder if I will be missing something without the Sport plus-- ILRON?
Well I for one hate, hate, hate sport mode on my E46. When you are trying to drive fast the last thing you want is a throttle thats practically an on/off switch.

Sure, I guess if you only drive on the street and want to think your car is faster than it is it might makes some sense. But if you actually want to go fast, its useless.
enigma is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-24-2007, 03:11 AM   #40
Sedan_Clan
Banned
 
Drives: '14 335i(prev.IB,AW M3's & X5)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: On 2 wheels clipping an apex!

Posts: 10,920
iTrader: (25)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregMM View Post
Ok...should not have said "never" They did it with the E36 but they added some new tech and increased displacement a little to get the E36 to 321hp. Not quite like adding 2 more cylinders though, or a turbo or many of the other things hoped for.

I stand corrected though
I don't recall if that E36 was available in the U.S.
Sedan_Clan is offline   Brazil
0
Reply With Quote
      10-24-2007, 03:12 AM   #41
enigma
Captain
 
Drives: E92 M3 and Elise
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Land of the Microchip

Posts: 689
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
For example why pay thousands for Nav when PocketPC Nav systems are better than in dash systems? I really enjoy the same Nav interface when traveling and renting cars as when in my own car. What a waste I will be forced into...
Its probably as simple as the systems are manufactured as one unit. Its really not worth getting upset over. Is it seperate in other countries?

I have the built in nav in my old car and happen to like the integration. To each is own. However, BMW is in business to make money. They are not out to hurt customers any more than Porsche, or any other car company. They want to produce a product and then sell it for as much as they can. That simple.
enigma is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-24-2007, 03:13 AM   #42
enigma
Captain
 
Drives: E92 M3 and Elise
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Land of the Microchip

Posts: 689
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan View Post
I don't recall if that E36 was available in the U.S.
It was not. The US did not get a mid life HP upgrade.
enigma is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      10-24-2007, 03:24 AM   #43
Sedan_Clan
Banned
 
Drives: '14 335i(prev.IB,AW M3's & X5)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: On 2 wheels clipping an apex!

Posts: 10,920
iTrader: (25)

Quote:
Originally Posted by enigma View Post
Its probably as simple as the systems are manufactured as one unit. Its really not worth getting upset over. Is it seperate in other countries?

I have the built in nav in my old car and happen to like the integration. To each is own. However, BMW is in business to make money. They are not out to hurt customers any more than Porsche, or any other car company. They want to produce a product and then sell it for as much as they can. That simple.
Agreed! I like the integration as well.


Quote:
Originally Posted by enigma View Post
It was not. The US did not get a mid life HP upgrade.
I didn't think so.
Sedan_Clan is offline   Brazil
0
Reply With Quote
      10-24-2007, 04:58 AM   #44
mkoesel
Moderator
 
Drives: 2015 SO/CSAT F80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canton, MI

Posts: 13,750
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan View Post
I don't recall if that E36 was available in the U.S.
It wasn't.

Edit: didn't see this was already answered.
__________________
A gen-u-ine BMW eff-eight-zero with them tandem clutches in the transmission and that dad gum sun roof on the top-a da cawr.
mkoesel is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST