BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > M3 vs....
 
GetBMWParts
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      06-21-2012, 03:11 AM   #23
KKM3
Lieutenant
United_States
12
Rep
504
Posts

 
Drives: E92 m3 + r8 v10
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by erm324 View Post
The new M5 is nowhere near Z06 quick. Bottom line.
Your in denial bro
Appreciate 0
      06-21-2012, 03:48 AM   #24
48Laws
Captain
10
Rep
607
Posts

 
Drives: '11 M3
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: East Coast

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine View Post
Sorry, it's just a variable that makes these comparisons difficult. Who knows how well or at which rpm the z06 driver is shifting at. I'm sure I could look up trap speeds for both cars, if they are close, yes it is impressive, but then again is it really that impressive. I would have to imagine that for performance luxury the panamera is the bench mark, I'm sure the M5 is good, it just needs to be raced against it's peers.
You can always compare horsepower.
Appreciate 0
      06-21-2012, 05:58 AM   #25
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
215
Rep
10,201
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (1)

The Z06 has a clearly superior power to weight but the DCT does add quite some real effective hp to the M5 from a performance perspective. We have seen the exact same effect in the M3 DCT vs. MT. In a stock M3 the DCT is probably good for 20-50 effective hp depending on the contest (much discussion and validation on this if you do not believe it right here on this forum). Also the German Sport Auto magazine found the two cars nearly neck to neck in a drag race. I think the video is reasonable.
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2012, 09:17 PM   #26
Beemw335
Colonel
29
Rep
2,016
Posts

 
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: My car is my home

iTrader: (2)

A good driver in the z06 and it will stomp the m5.
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2012, 11:36 PM   #27
DiavelM3
4 Star General -Twilight Zone
DiavelM3's Avatar
United_States
17
Rep
1,025
Posts

 
Drives: '11 E92 M3 ZCP
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 5280

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemw335 View Post
A good driver in the z06 and it will stomp the m5.
And a good driver in the M5 and it will stomp the Z06!
Thats not much of an argument dude, try again
__________________
'12 Ducati Diavel
'06 E46 M3 (sold) | '97 325is - Dinan (sold)
'02 Z3 3.0 coupe (sold)
Past - '84 Ferrari 308 GTSI | '88 Ferrari 328 GTS | '05 Dodge Viper Copperhead Edition #180/300 | Audi S4
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2012, 11:57 PM   #28
DARK_M3
Banned
33
Rep
1,294
Posts

 
Drives: 08 E90, 89 Grand Wagoneer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: So Cal

iTrader: (3)

Appreciate 0
      06-24-2012, 12:03 AM   #29
DARK_M3
Banned
33
Rep
1,294
Posts

 
Drives: 08 E90, 89 Grand Wagoneer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: So Cal

iTrader: (3)

It's funny. I see some of you impressed with the Z06 (as was I) and a bunch of others simply making excuses for it. You would all make great lawyers because apparently video lies. lol

Pumping the sound of a V8 through the speakers is still lame though.
Appreciate 0
      06-24-2012, 01:01 AM   #30
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
215
Rep
10,201
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DARK_M3 View Post
Pumping the sound of a V8 through the speakers is still lame though.
Absolutely. BMW blew it pretty bad on this point. It does not matter if it is real engine sounds, synthesized ones, intake sound or not. Whatever they've done is completely lame...
Appreciate 0
      06-25-2012, 10:45 PM   #31
nick3753
Lieutenant
8
Rep
574
Posts

 
Drives: 2012 e92 M3 DCT ZCP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fresno,CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiavelM3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemw335 View Post
A good driver in the z06 and it will stomp the m5.
And a good driver in the M5 and it will stomp the Z06!
Thats not much of an argument dude, try again
Maybe I'm missing something, but how hard is it to push the pedal to the floor and drive in a straight line from a rolling start with a DCT car?
Appreciate 0
      06-25-2012, 11:04 PM   #32
clar
Major
clar's Avatar
Singapore
26
Rep
1,035
Posts

 
Drives: M5
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Singapore

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by nick3753 View Post
Maybe I'm missing something, but how hard is it to push the pedal to the floor and drive in a straight line from a rolling start with a DCT car?
I am not sure if the F10 M5 had the DSC disabled. That is an absolute must. If you simply put pedal to the metal with DSC On, the sheer amount of torque would render the power useless and light up the dash with the DSC light. Even with MDM, u still can't deploy the full power. DSC Off is a must in any drag race for the new M5.
__________________

- Frozen Grey F10 M5 DCT
- Rosso Corsa 458 Speciale
- Frozen Grey E92 M3 Sold
Appreciate 0
      06-26-2012, 12:08 AM   #33
boostedM
First Lieutenant
boostedM's Avatar
United_States
8
Rep
331
Posts

 
Drives: Active Stage II E92 M3
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Daytona Beach, FL

iTrader: (1)

The Z06 driver could definitely have shifted better, but it wouldn't have made too much of a difference. Remember, the Z06 only makes 505 crank, while the F10 is supposed to make (at least) 560. From a 50kph roll, torque and power-to-weight make a substantially smaller difference.
__________________


Instagram: @mitchellbanks
Appreciate 0
      06-26-2012, 12:15 AM   #34
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
215
Rep
10,201
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by boostedM View Post
From a 50kph roll, torque and power-to-weight make a substantially smaller difference.
That is incorrect. At any given speed (all speeds...) power to weight determines acceleration. The car that makes more power to weight will accelerate harder. There are some minor corrections to this for losses, gear inertia, etc. but power to weight it all that matters. As stated prior in a battle involving a wide range of speeds and shifts shift time is also a very significant factor. Torque is mostly meaningless. This topic has been discussed and debated time and time again here on the forum and the conclusion is always the same.
Appreciate 0
      06-26-2012, 12:26 AM   #35
boostedM
First Lieutenant
boostedM's Avatar
United_States
8
Rep
331
Posts

 
Drives: Active Stage II E92 M3
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Daytona Beach, FL

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
That is incorrect. At any given speed (all speeds...) power to weight determines acceleration. The car that makes more power to weight will accelerate harder. There are some minor corrections to this for losses, gear inertia, etc. but power to weight it all that matters. As stated prior in a battle involving a wide range of speeds and shifts shift time is also a very significant factor. Torque is mostly meaningless. This topic has been discussed and debated time and time again here on the forum and the conclusion is always the same.
I just meant that power-to-weight makes less of a difference at a higher speed than it does from a lower speed or a dig. And the lower speeds and digs are also where torque becomes a factor. I may have worded it poorly
__________________


Instagram: @mitchellbanks
Appreciate 0
      06-26-2012, 01:31 AM   #36
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
215
Rep
10,201
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by boostedM View Post
I just meant that power-to-weight makes less of a difference at a higher speed than it does from a lower speed or a dig. And the lower speeds and digs are also where torque becomes a factor. I may have worded it poorly
Gotcha. Keep in mind that power to weight still matters when accelerating at high speeds, it is just that ultimate top speed is purely limited by power and drag but not weight. Torque at the crank is also a meaningless quantity. Gear ratio must be involved to make a physically meaningful quantity. I think part of the reason folks believe torque matters at low speeds is sort of an artifact. The power can be higher at lower rpms at and right after launch in a typical high torque low power engine (say Vette vs. M3). Either way its still actually about power to weight . Cheers.
Appreciate 0
      06-26-2012, 03:19 PM   #37
boostedM
First Lieutenant
boostedM's Avatar
United_States
8
Rep
331
Posts

 
Drives: Active Stage II E92 M3
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Daytona Beach, FL

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Either way its still actually about power to weight
True that!
__________________


Instagram: @mitchellbanks
Appreciate 0
      06-26-2012, 04:24 PM   #38
M3PO
Colonel
M3PO's Avatar
34
Rep
2,777
Posts

 
Drives: '08 IB E92
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: OC

iTrader: (7)

Dat V10.

I will ALWAYS prefer the E60 because of the glorious S85. Don't care how fast the F10 is.
__________________
2008 IB E92 M3| BBS | KW | Arkym | Platte Forme A.G. | Active Autowerke | K&N | Fabspeed | Dinan | Evolve-R
Appreciate 0
      06-26-2012, 05:40 PM   #39
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
91
Rep
3,498
Posts

 
Drives: 08 E92 DCT M3
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Send a message via AIM to DLSJ5
Quote:
Originally Posted by erm324 View Post
The new M5 is nowhere near Z06 quick. Bottom line.
Agreed, a properly driven C6 Z06, should outrun a stock F10 M5.
__________________
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.44s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690Whp/463Wtq
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2012, 07:37 AM   #40
erm324
Major
No_Country
29
Rep
1,055
Posts

 
Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Onurleft View Post
It's trapped 123 on the factor tires, it's in the same damn neighborhood actually.

However, this guy in the video cannot shift better than average
Quote:
Originally Posted by KKM3 View Post
Your in denial bro
Really? Well your delusional for thinking so. Its nowhere in the same neighborhood because I've seen stock Z06's trap 129-130 at atco, there is a huge disparity between the performance of both cars ESPECIALLY in a straight line. The performance of a Z06 is heavily driver dependant - find a guy who can bang through the gears on that car the right way and not granny shift and the M5 will be lagging far far behind.
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2012, 07:41 AM   #41
erm324
Major
No_Country
29
Rep
1,055
Posts

 
Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3PO View Post
Dat V10.

I will ALWAYS prefer the E60 because of the glorious S85. Don't care how fast the F10 is.
+1
Not a fan of the new M5 either, just the sound of the V10 in the E60 was enough to make that car the obvious choice for me, rather have a high revving V10 that screams than a muted V8TT.
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2012, 08:24 AM   #42
48Laws
Captain
10
Rep
607
Posts

 
Drives: '11 M3
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: East Coast

iTrader: (0)

Power-to-weight isn't always an advantage. It's the tune. What about high-performance boats like the Cayenne Turbo S or Panamera Turbos?
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2012, 03:00 PM   #43
bruce.augenstein@comcast.
Lieutenant Colonel
21
Rep
1,908
Posts

 
Drives: Legacy GT - 13.704@99.39
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manheim, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 48Laws View Post
Power-to-weight isn't always an advantage. It's the tune. What about high-performance boats like the Cayenne Turbo S or Panamera Turbos?
Power to weight actually is always an advantage. On the other hand, torque is pretty much always good too, so if two cars have similar power to weight, but one of them has a significant torque advantage, that car will likely win a drag race. Think average C63 vs average M3.

Otherwise, as it said in a "Murphy's Law" poster on my office wall:

"The battle may not always go to the strong, nor the race to the swift -

- but that's the way to bet."


Horsepower wins races.

Bruce

Edit: PS - In this case the lightning shifts in the M5 are contrasted with what seems to be painfully slow shifting by the Z06 pilot, allowing the M5 to hold its own or even pull on the Vette.

Last edited by bruce.augenstein@comcast.; 06-27-2012 at 03:31 PM.
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2012, 03:46 PM   #44
Sauce
Lieutenant
Sauce's Avatar
10
Rep
528
Posts

 
Drives: Montego 135
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Studio City

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 48Laws View Post
Power-to-weight isn't always an advantage. It's the tune. What about high-performance boats like the Cayenne Turbo S or Panamera Turbos?
I don't understand this? It's the tune? Meaning if they're tuned or not? Well either way, those cars you mentioned weigh a ton, but also have a ton of power. Their power to weights are similar to many high performance cars.

And for the rest of the conversation, horsepower and torque are the SAME THING. They are just different words for force. HP= torque x rpm/5250. You can have horsepower by having more torque ie: c63's or by rpm's ie: Honda motors, but at the end of the day it's all just force.
__________________
KW V3's, Sparco Pro2000's, Vorshlag CP's, JB4, Heat Wrapped Raceland DP's, aFe stg. 2 Sealed Intake, Miro 111's, Hankook RS3's 225/245 (for now), Seibon M3 CF Hood, Turner Motorsports Alum. Radiator, Big Tom IC, BMW Performance bumper.

Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST