BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Suspension | Brakes | Chassis
 
INDustry distribution
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-01-2012, 10:31 AM   #1
grussell
Private First Class
grussell's Avatar
United_States
2
Rep
124
Posts

 
Drives: 2012 SG E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Valencia, CA

iTrader: (3)

max camber -1.6?

I am a bit puzzled. I had Dinan springs and camber plates installed and was hoping to get -2.0 to -2.4 in the front and -1.8 to -2.0 in the rear.

The shop told me the max they could get was -1.6 front and rear. This seems inconsistent with so many others.

My car is a 2012 E92 M3 ZCP. I would appreciate any feedback.

Last edited by grussell; 08-01-2012 at 11:25 AM.
Appreciate 0
      08-01-2012, 10:53 AM   #2
smmmurf
Colonel
32
Rep
2,113
Posts

 
Drives: 2009 M3 Sedan 6MT
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pleasanton, CA

iTrader: (7)

It's possible but not normal. You should be able to get 1.6 with pins pulled and stock springs. With the Dinan camber plates installed you should be getting at least -2 degrees.

ZCP doesn't matter once you change the springs (only suspension geometry difference between regular and ZCP suspension)
__________________
M3 Sedan - AW/Black - 6MT - no moonroof - no folding seats - RAC RG63 - clear bra by Omega Werks
Appreciate 0
      08-01-2012, 11:24 AM   #3
pbonsalb
Lieutenant Colonel
21
Rep
1,790
Posts

 
Drives: 08 E90 M3, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Concord, NH

iTrader: (3)

You can probably further slot the slotted holes for more inward (negative) range.
Appreciate 0
      08-01-2012, 12:03 PM   #4
radiantm3
Apex Everything!
radiantm3's Avatar
United_States
159
Rep
3,876
Posts

 
Drives: >1000 HP in my garage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Danville, CA

iTrader: (6)

Garage List
2011 E92 M3  [4.80]
2013 BMW X5M  [4.33]
2014 BMW i3  [0.00]
Hmm. I have 1.8 stock with the pins pulled. Definitely should get more with Dinan.
Appreciate 0
      08-01-2012, 02:39 PM   #5
smmmurf
Colonel
32
Rep
2,113
Posts

 
Drives: 2009 M3 Sedan 6MT
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pleasanton, CA

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by radiantm3 View Post
Hmm. I have 1.8 stock with the pins pulled. Definitely should get more with Dinan.
Dinan plates yes, but Dinan springs are barely lower than ZCP.
__________________
M3 Sedan - AW/Black - 6MT - no moonroof - no folding seats - RAC RG63 - clear bra by Omega Werks
Appreciate 0
      08-01-2012, 03:16 PM   #6
Porschefile
Major
Porschefile's Avatar
16
Rep
1,233
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tennessee

iTrader: (6)

Definitely not normal. I got -1.6 front stock with pins pulled and stock non-zcp springs. The stock setup can get over -2.0 rear (or at least mine did). Just the springs without the plates should get you over 1.6 front. I'd go to a different shop.
Appreciate 0
      08-02-2012, 01:26 AM   #7
Autobahn335i
Lieutenant Colonel
Autobahn335i's Avatar
Luxembourg
28
Rep
1,600
Posts

 
Drives: E92 335i
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Luxembourg

iTrader: (5)

Springs don't influence camber in the front. But with M3 suspension arms and Dinan camber plates I have -2 degrees. So -1.6 is definitely not right.
__________________
Performance Seats, Exhaust, Splitters, Pedals, Steering Wheel / RB Turbos / M3 CF Roof / Brembo GT BBK 355/345 / Rollcage / Forge FMIC / Quaife LSD / Íhlins Road & Track / M3 Suspension Parts / Powerflex Bushings / Vorshlag Camberplates / Megan Racing Toe Links / LeatherZ Gauges / Extended M3 DCT Paddles / ER Sports OC / AR OC / Aux Radiator / AR DPs / Alpina TCU / COBB Pro-Tune
Appreciate 0
      08-02-2012, 06:34 AM   #8
pbonsalb
Lieutenant Colonel
21
Rep
1,790
Posts

 
Drives: 08 E90 M3, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Concord, NH

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autobahn335i View Post
Springs don't influence camber in the front. But with M3 suspension arms and Dinan camber plates I have -2 degrees. So -1.6 is definitely not right.
In the old days, lowering springs increased negative camber slightly and moved the toe out slightly. Has the front suspension design changed so this is no longer the case?
Appreciate 0
      08-02-2012, 10:06 AM   #9
smmmurf
Colonel
32
Rep
2,113
Posts

 
Drives: 2009 M3 Sedan 6MT
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pleasanton, CA

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
In the old days, lowering springs increased negative camber slightly and moved the toe out slightly. Has the front suspension design changed so this is no longer the case?
No, you are right

ZCP is lower than non ZCP and based on anecdotes from the forum generally can get ~.3 more negative camber than non ZCP at stock height. The only difference in geometry= ride height

Mine did -1.6 in the front, ZCP cars are generally able to get -1.9 or -2.0
__________________
M3 Sedan - AW/Black - 6MT - no moonroof - no folding seats - RAC RG63 - clear bra by Omega Werks
Appreciate 0
      08-02-2012, 10:26 AM   #10
grussell
Private First Class
grussell's Avatar
United_States
2
Rep
124
Posts

 
Drives: 2012 SG E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Valencia, CA

iTrader: (3)

The shop did another alignment and the settings are now

-2.1 front
0 toe

-1.8 rear

Thanks for all of your feedback!
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 0
      08-02-2012, 10:36 AM   #11
smmmurf
Colonel
32
Rep
2,113
Posts

 
Drives: 2009 M3 Sedan 6MT
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pleasanton, CA

iTrader: (7)

That's not bad. enjoy
__________________
M3 Sedan - AW/Black - 6MT - no moonroof - no folding seats - RAC RG63 - clear bra by Omega Werks
Appreciate 0
      08-02-2012, 10:43 AM   #12
Malek@MRF
Brigadier General
Malek@MRF's Avatar
United_States
62
Rep
3,404
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3, E46 M3, F30, E30
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Irvine, California

iTrader: (5)

Send a message via AIM to Malek@MRF
Quote:
Originally Posted by grussell View Post
I am a bit puzzled. I had Dinan springs and camber plates installed and was hoping to get -2.0 to -2.4 in the front and -1.8 to -2.0 in the rear.

The shop told me the max they could get was -1.6 front and rear. This seems inconsistent with so many others.

My car is a 2012 E92 M3 ZCP. I would appreciate any feedback.
You should be able to obtain at least -1.8 on the front with the Dinan Plates. It is possible to get -2.0 on the stock setup.

Only -1.6* in the rear is incorrect. The car can go down to -2.4 to -2.6 degrees negative in the rear without an issue.
Appreciate 0
      08-02-2012, 05:31 PM   #13
grussell
Private First Class
grussell's Avatar
United_States
2
Rep
124
Posts

 
Drives: 2012 SG E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Valencia, CA

iTrader: (3)

This was the final maximum camber we could get
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 0
      08-02-2012, 07:36 PM   #14
pbonsalb
Lieutenant Colonel
21
Rep
1,790
Posts

 
Drives: 08 E90 M3, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Concord, NH

iTrader: (3)

What do you want in the rear for handling? On the E36M3 with which I am more familiar, the goal is about 1 degree less negative in the rear relative to the front. Is the ideal gap less in the E9xM3 for certain reasons? Or are people trying to minimize tire wear?
Appreciate 0
      08-02-2012, 08:56 PM   #15
Porschefile
Major
Porschefile's Avatar
16
Rep
1,233
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tennessee

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autobahn335i View Post
Springs don't influence camber in the front.
Yes they do. Lowering the car by any means influences camber, both front and rear. Lowering the car increases negative camber and increases toe out in front. Raising it does the opposite obviously.
Appreciate 0
      08-03-2012, 02:35 AM   #16
Autobahn335i
Lieutenant Colonel
Autobahn335i's Avatar
Luxembourg
28
Rep
1,600
Posts

 
Drives: E92 335i
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Luxembourg

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Porschefile View Post
Yes they do. Lowering the car by any means influences camber, both front and rear. Lowering the car increases negative camber and increases toe out in front. Raising it does the opposite obviously.
I respectfully disagree. You're right for the rear, but the front suspension design is different. My car is very low with the Bilstein PSS10 suspension but the only camber I have in the front is due to the M3 control arms and the camber plates. Camber stayed 0 when it was lowered only.
__________________
Performance Seats, Exhaust, Splitters, Pedals, Steering Wheel / RB Turbos / M3 CF Roof / Brembo GT BBK 355/345 / Rollcage / Forge FMIC / Quaife LSD / Íhlins Road & Track / M3 Suspension Parts / Powerflex Bushings / Vorshlag Camberplates / Megan Racing Toe Links / LeatherZ Gauges / Extended M3 DCT Paddles / ER Sports OC / AR OC / Aux Radiator / AR DPs / Alpina TCU / COBB Pro-Tune
Appreciate 0
      08-05-2012, 10:22 AM   #17
edwinm3
Colonel
edwinm3's Avatar
United_States
38
Rep
2,100
Posts

 
Drives: E92 MELBOURNE RED M3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Doral

iTrader: (10)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
What do you want in the rear for handling? On the E36M3 with which I am more familiar, the goal is about 1 degree less negative in the rear relative to the front. Is the ideal gap less in the E9xM3 for certain reasons? Or are people trying to minimize tire wear?
I was thinking the same. I'm getting mine aligned tomorrow. I'm gonna go as much neg camber I can get in the front with pins pulled on stock suspension.

Getting mine done at the dealer, they use sand bags to put weight on the car when doing alignments. Problem aligning the car without adding weight is that as soon as you sit on the car the balance wont be the same and the alignment is gonna be a bit off. I know some of you guys hate the dealers but for alignments its either that or ask your indy shop if you can sit in the car while they align it. It's like installing a set of coilovers and not corner balancing the car, what's the advantage?
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-05-2012, 04:16 PM   #18
pbonsalb
Lieutenant Colonel
21
Rep
1,790
Posts

 
Drives: 08 E90 M3, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Concord, NH

iTrader: (3)

I have seen the official instructions for aligning, but why align the car for 500 lbs or whatever if you normally drive with just 200 lbs in it? And why can't alignment specs be produced for an empty car -- for example, if you did the weight method and the took the weight out and took new alignment measurements?
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2012, 03:05 AM   #19
sleepless
Private First Class
sleepless's Avatar
United_States
2
Rep
116
Posts

 
Drives: 11 E90 M3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Redmond, WA

iTrader: (0)

A good alignment shop also uses weights, so no need to rely on the dealer...
__________________
'11 E90, Cantrell brake ducts, Apex 18x10 ARC-8, 265/35 PSS, RS19 pads, -2.2 camber, CMS Lap Timer Pro
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2012, 05:55 AM   #20
pbonsalb
Lieutenant Colonel
21
Rep
1,790
Posts

 
Drives: 08 E90 M3, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Concord, NH

iTrader: (3)

Play sand is maybe $5 per bag at lowes or home depot. Return it when you are done. You will get a good workout.
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2012, 06:39 AM   #21
edwinm3
Colonel
edwinm3's Avatar
United_States
38
Rep
2,100
Posts

 
Drives: E92 MELBOURNE RED M3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Doral

iTrader: (10)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb
Play sand is maybe $5 per bag at lowes or home depot. Return it when you are done. You will get a good workout.
Lol
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2012, 08:50 AM   #22
leo95se
Lieutenant
United_States
7
Rep
494
Posts

 
Drives: 09 JB e92, Q5 and passat
Join Date: May 2009
Location: CT

iTrader: (1)

whats the ideal camber for track? my oem setup is ~1.6 to 1.7 and tire wear is killing me. its really bad, down to a few days per with the hot weather.

if i throw plates on, what camber should i look to target? thanks..
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST