BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
European Auto Source
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      05-13-2012, 03:26 PM   #1
willpeoples
New Member
 
Drives: e92 m3 coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: asheville

Posts: 15
iTrader: (0)

Drop in filter?

So guys been doing a little reading and it seems like the drop in filter is the place to start. So which one is the best? Thanks in advance.
willpeoples is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 03:32 PM   #2
THE-FN-MAN
Captain
 
Drives: E92 M3 x2
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: the wood

Posts: 841
iTrader: (0)

I like my AFE oiled one. But all
Of em seem to be pretty similar. I've heard to stay away from the dry
THE-FN-MAN is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 03:50 PM   #3
willpeoples
New Member
 
Drives: e92 m3 coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: asheville

Posts: 15
iTrader: (0)

Yea I was thinking afe but wanted to see if that was the most common.
willpeoples is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 04:39 PM   #4
aus
Major General
 
Drives: Odysse
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seal Beach, CA

Posts: 7,323
iTrader: (5)

Don't want to go too OT, but when did the larger filter start being used?

My filter for my 2008 doesn't fit my 2011 car.

OP, the main difference is some are cotton filters (you can wash them), and some are are paper filters without the charcoal layer. Supposedly, the charcoal free ones are used in Europe.

.
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
aus is online now  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 04:40 PM   #5
C|3R1C
So Kewl Guy
 
C|3R1C's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 E93 M3 DCT
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Los Angeles

Posts: 503
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by THE-FN-MAN View Post
I like my AFE oiled one. But all
Of em seem to be pretty similar. I've heard to stay away from the dry
Why stay away from the dry?
__________________
2010 E93 M3 / AA Catless X-Pipe / AA Catback / AA Pulley / Vorsteiner Vented Hood and Bootlid E93 Trunk / ADV1 7.1 Wheels GB / LS3 LED Lights / AFE Stage 2 / Velos Designwerks Tune
C|3R1C is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 06:45 PM   #6
KJ
First Lieutenant
 
Drives: 2008 E92 M3 - Alpine White
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto

Posts: 377
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by aus View Post
Don't want to go too OT, but when did the larger filter start being used?

My filter for my 2008 doesn't fit my 2011 car.

OP, the main difference is some are cotton filters (you can wash them), and some are are paper filters without the charcoal layer. Supposedly, the charcoal free ones are used in Europe.

.
The filter is the same size, except for a nipple at the top on 2010+ filters.

The 2008-2009 filters have a charcoal filter which is really restrictive. That's why swapping these older filters is much more beneficial.

- KJ
KJ is offline   Canada
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 06:59 PM   #7
m3an
Banned
 
m3an's Avatar
 
Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Florida

Posts: 1,611
iTrader: (2)

K&N; can be found for 50$ on amazon
m3an is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 07:28 PM   #8
THE-FN-MAN
Captain
 
Drives: E92 M3 x2
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: the wood

Posts: 841
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by C|3R1C
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE-FN-MAN View Post
I like my AFE oiled one. But all
Of em seem to be pretty similar. I've heard to stay away from the dry
Why stay away from the dry?
I was told that the oil does about 90% of the "trapping" and that dry is more of a race thing when you need absolutely every last bit of power you can get. Not worth it in my opinion
THE-FN-MAN is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 08:39 PM   #9
pbonsalb
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Drives: 08 E90 M3, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Concord, NH

Posts: 1,612
iTrader: (3)

K&N has been making oiled filters longer than anyone else. They know how to do it. And they are priced reasonably for the E9x M3 application.
pbonsalb is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 10:02 PM   #10
m3an
Banned
 
m3an's Avatar
 
Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Florida

Posts: 1,611
iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by THE-FN-MAN View Post
I was told that the oil does about 90% of the "trapping" and that dry is more of a race thing when you need absolutely every last bit of power you can get. Not worth it in my opinion
yes oil does help w/ trapping. But oiled filters flow a little better, using the oil also to help filter. A dry filer does not flow the same, so in essence a oiled filter flows more cfm hence why I (at least) prefer oiled filters. there is no maf sensor to foul on these cars and IMO the people that do and then bad mouth the filter, don't know what they're doing
m3an is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 10:14 PM   #11
tibra1
Banned
 
Drives: 2011 ZCP M3 - 2007 335i crashd
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NYC

Posts: 6,777
iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by THE-FN-MAN View Post
I like my AFE oiled one. But all
Of em seem to be pretty similar. I've heard to stay away from the dry
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE-FN-MAN View Post
I was told that the oil does about 90% of the "trapping" and that dry is more of a race thing when you need absolutely every last bit of power you can get. Not worth it in my opinion
I have been running dry for over 3K miles now..You have it reversed...the oil flows slightly better than the dry..but the dry filters better..and no need to mess with oil coating the intake tract
tibra1 is offline   No_Country
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 11:07 PM   #12
mark896
Warrant Officer
 
mark896's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 E92 335is
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Alabama

Posts: 452
iTrader: (0)

I've got an Active Autowerke's filter (green) and it's a great fit. I think I paid $70 for it.
mark896 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      05-13-2012, 11:22 PM   #13
aus
Major General
 
Drives: Odysse
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seal Beach, CA

Posts: 7,323
iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ View Post
The filter is the same size, except for a nipple at the top on 2010+ filters.

The 2008-2009 filters have a charcoal filter which is really restrictive. That's why swapping these older filters is much more beneficial.

- KJ
Weird, because my filter for my 2008 M3 is about 1 inch too short for the 2011 car.
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
aus is online now  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-14-2012, 12:09 AM   #14
tibra1
Banned
 
Drives: 2011 ZCP M3 - 2007 335i crashd
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NYC

Posts: 6,777
iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by aus View Post
Weird, because my filter for my 2008 M3 is about 1 inch too short for the 2011 car.
The intake setup changed a bit from for model years 2010

AFE makes one for the 2008-09 without the rubber end piece

Name:  2008.jpg
Views: 805
Size:  56.2 KB

and one for 2010-11 with the rubber end piece

Name:  2010.jpg
Views: 800
Size:  25.5 KB
tibra1 is offline   No_Country
0
Reply With Quote
      05-14-2012, 03:23 AM   #15
THE-FN-MAN
Captain
 
Drives: E92 M3 x2
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: the wood

Posts: 841
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tibra1
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE-FN-MAN View Post
I like my AFE oiled one. But all
Of em seem to be pretty similar. I've heard to stay away from the dry
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE-FN-MAN View Post
I was told that the oil does about 90% of the "trapping" and that dry is more of a race thing when you need absolutely every last bit of power you can get. Not worth it in my opinion
I have been running dry for over 3K miles now..You have it reversed...the oil flows slightly better than the dry..but the dry filters better..and no need to mess with oil coating the intake tract
Right on. Now I've heard arguments for both hahaha. I'm no expert so I assume that since people rock em
On their cars with no issues, dry works quite well and is safe haha. I thought from a common since stand point that the oil would trap better just because of how sticky that crap is lol
THE-FN-MAN is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-14-2012, 05:15 AM   #16
crabman
Captain
 
Drives: M3
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: WA

Posts: 669
iTrader: (0)

Do a little searching and you will find that there are actual numbers on filtration. Whichever one you get makes little difference. I've seen nothing from an independent user who dynoed showing gains when it was done on a dyno that didn't belong to the people who sold it or the people who made it no matter what year. Unlike the older cars with the liner the newer ones don't get much of a savory sound improvement either. I could barely tell the difference between stock and the AA green filter.
__________________
2012 E92 Space Grey with fox red/black/black, comp, premium, DCT, premium sound, sirius, heated seats.
crabman is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-14-2012, 11:31 AM   #17
THE-FN-MAN
Captain
 
Drives: E92 M3 x2
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: the wood

Posts: 841
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by crabman
Do a little searching and you will find that there are actual numbers on filtration. Whichever one you get makes little difference. I've seen nothing from an independent user who dynoed showing gains when it was done on a dyno that didn't belong to the people who sold it or the people who made it no matter what year. Unlike the older cars with the liner the newer ones don't get much of a savory sound improvement either. I could barely tell the difference between stock and the AA green filter.
True true, I could hardly tell a difference as well and maybe im def but I couldn't really tell a difference in sound either. I suppose I need to freshen up my knowledge as well because I'm used to the older American cars (mustangs mostly) and I know there MAF's could easily get screwed up from to much oil on the filter but every tuner recommended an oiled one. Obviously the M3 is not a mustang
THE-FN-MAN is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-14-2012, 11:39 AM   #18
m3an
Banned
 
m3an's Avatar
 
Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Florida

Posts: 1,611
iTrader: (2)

the m3 (current gen) doesn't use a maf, it's a map sensor.. And do a little searching; don't believe all you read either. The problems people have with oiled filters fouling maf sensors don't know what they're doing. I have been using K&N oiled filters for 10 years in all my cars w/ no issues ever.
m3an is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-14-2012, 12:39 PM   #19
mark896
Warrant Officer
 
mark896's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 E92 335is
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Alabama

Posts: 452
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by THE-FN-MAN View Post
True true, I could hardly tell a difference as well and maybe im def but I couldn't really tell a difference in sound either. I suppose I need to freshen up my knowledge as well because I'm used to the older American cars (mustangs mostly) and I know there MAF's could easily get screwed up from to much oil on the filter but every tuner recommended an oiled one. Obviously the M3 is not a mustang
I could definitely tell a difference between the OEM paper and the AA--but only at wide open throttle. The engine sounded much throatier up front. Plus, in the long run, it's cheaper to have an oil immersion filter because they last forever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by talontid View Post
the m3 (current gen) doesn't use a maf, it's a map sensor.. And do a little searching; don't believe all you read either. The problems people have with oiled filters fouling maf sensors don't know what they're doing. I have been using K&N oiled filters for 10 years in all my cars w/ no issues ever.
I agree, been using oil immersion filters for 15 years, NEVER an issue on any of my MAF cars. You just can't oversoak it.
mark896 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      05-14-2012, 01:21 PM   #20
THE-FN-MAN
Captain
 
Drives: E92 M3 x2
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: the wood

Posts: 841
iTrader: (0)

I was always worried I wasn't using enough oil back in the day lol. I would just give the filter a light "spritz" and it seemed to work find. Good to hear that I apparently don't need any oil
THE-FN-MAN is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-14-2012, 09:35 PM   #21
ClyderGerman
New Member
 
Drives: bmw
Join Date: May 2012
Location: good

Posts: 7
iTrader: (0)

I've heard to stay away from the dry
__________________
ClyderGerman is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-14-2012, 10:28 PM   #22
BreakPoint
Banned
 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: North NJ

Posts: 577
iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClyderGerman
I've heard to stay away from the dry
But why? Was there a reason behind the madness?
BreakPoint is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST