BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > Regional Forums > Australia
 
rolloface
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-06-2012, 06:10 AM   #1
DaveDee
When there's no problem more power is the solution
 
DaveDee's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3 Edition M-DCT
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gold Coast Australia

Posts: 665
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Send a message via Skype™ to DaveDee
Does your engine ping?

Before doing an ESS tune I often had pinging which has since totally disappeared and economy has improved.

I tried all brands of premium unleaded and often found BP ultimate to give slightly better results than Shell 98 or Caltex 98.

Has anyone found the same problem or have a preferred fuel?
__________________
DaveDee is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      03-06-2012, 07:15 PM   #2
MFKN3
Colonel
 
MFKN3's Avatar
 
Drives: 4.5L stroker s/c E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Australia

Posts: 2,029
iTrader: (2)

I've never paid too much attention. Maybe the tune decreased the timing a bit?

I can't seem to get over 280km on a tank lately, using shell 98
MFKN3 is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      03-06-2012, 10:07 PM   #3
M_GmbH
Private First Class
 
M_GmbH's Avatar
 
Drives: M3 2012 e92 ZCP - Space Grey
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sydney

Posts: 132
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKN3 View Post
...

I can't seem to get over 280km on a tank lately, using shell 98
Wow that is horrible. I get about 360-400 to a tank and thats in Sydney traffic!
M_GmbH is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      03-06-2012, 10:54 PM   #4
MFKN3
Colonel
 
MFKN3's Avatar
 
Drives: 4.5L stroker s/c E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Australia

Posts: 2,029
iTrader: (2)

Sure is! I get about 500-550km entirely highway, so it's not the engine.

I think it's bad traffic, hot weather, driving hard & all the bolt ons sure don't help

My 335 used to pull timing when running under high boost on caltex fuel. Never had problems with shell or BP either DaveDee
MFKN3 is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      03-07-2012, 10:43 PM   #5
Damo11
New Member
 
Drives: Jerez Black E92 M3 6M
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Brisbane

Posts: 23
iTrader: (0)

I'm getting around 280-300 max out of a tank of shell 98. I haven't used BP ultimate yet. Maybe I bought too much into the marekting hype that shell put out but that's been my choice until now. Would be interested in hearing if anyone else has better fuel consumption without loss of performance from any other brand.
Damo11 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      03-07-2012, 11:22 PM   #6
DaveDee
When there's no problem more power is the solution
 
DaveDee's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3 Edition M-DCT
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gold Coast Australia

Posts: 665
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Send a message via Skype™ to DaveDee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damo11 View Post
I'm getting around 280-300 max out of a tank of shell 98. I haven't used BP ultimate yet. Maybe I bought too much into the marekting hype that shell put out but that's been my choice until now. Would be interested in hearing if anyone else has better fuel consumption without loss of performance from any other brand.
Iv'e run Shell 98, Vortex 98 and BP Ultimate 98. Average fuel economy around the Gold Coast (and we do have a lot of traffic now) is 11.5/100 or close to 480-500 Ks between fills. On a long run it does not really improve.
Before the ESS tune and Akra Evo average was around 13.5 litres per 100 KM.
The BP seems to have a slight edge, but not much.
__________________
DaveDee is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      03-08-2012, 02:26 AM   #7
whyw8
Lieutenant
 
Drives: E92 M3 ZCP Jerez Black DCT
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Melbourne

Posts: 508
iTrader: (0)

wow 11.5 - im around 13.8
whyw8 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      03-08-2012, 05:12 AM   #8
sarddenso
Private First Class
 
Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sydney

Posts: 114
iTrader: (0)

Hot weather isn't something we have had much of in Sydney these last few months!

I generally pump Caltex. There is not much routine to the way I use my car but usually get a bit over 400kms a tank.

On a trip to Canberra and back nearly did 600km to the tank.
sarddenso is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      03-08-2012, 08:26 AM   #9
BMJOE
Private First Class
 
BMJOE's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 335i
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne

Posts: 196
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKN3 View Post
Sure is! I get about 500-550km entirely highway, so it's not the engine.

I think it's bad traffic, hot weather, driving hard & all the bolt ons sure don't help

My 335 used to pull timing when running under high boost on caltex fuel. Never had problems with shell or BP either DaveDee
i have been using Vortex 98 98% of the time with my 335, what are issues with pulling timing?

cheers

Joe
__________________
E92 335i White Angel Eyes | BMW Black Gloss Grills | CF Mirror Covers
BMJOE is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      03-10-2012, 01:47 AM   #10
MFKN3
Colonel
 
MFKN3's Avatar
 
Drives: 4.5L stroker s/c E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Australia

Posts: 2,029
iTrader: (2)

It wouldn't produce as much power on caltex under 18psi boost. I wouldn't worry though, being in melbourne, it would be different refineries.
MFKN3 is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      03-10-2012, 01:52 AM   #11
BMJOE
Private First Class
 
BMJOE's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 335i
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne

Posts: 196
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKN3 View Post
It wouldn't produce as much power on caltex under 18psi boost. I wouldn't worry though, being in melbourne, it would be different refineries.
cheers mate....

joe
__________________
E92 335i White Angel Eyes | BMW Black Gloss Grills | CF Mirror Covers
BMJOE is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      03-10-2012, 05:25 PM   #12
aussiem3
Lieutenant Colonel
 
aussiem3's Avatar
 
Drives: Goggomobil
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kangaroo land

Posts: 1,615
iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2014 BMW X5 30d  [0.00]
2007 E92 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damo11 View Post
I'm getting around 280-300 max out of a tank of shell 98. I haven't used BP ultimate yet. Maybe I bought too much into the marekting hype that shell put out but that's been my choice until now. Would be interested in hearing if anyone else has better fuel consumption without loss of performance from any other brand.
I've always pumped BP Ultimate 98 from the time I bought the car until Shell Introduced their V-Power in WA. My consumption has gone up from 14.7l/100 to 15, now that's city only driving. I haven't changed my driving style.

Also I noticed the exhaust note from the /// Performance exhaust is a lot sportier and sounds mean - a true V8 - when using Shell. I don't know whether it's just me.

I don't know how the two compare in terms of quality, performance and economy.
__________________

2007 E92 6MT - Silverstone II with /// Performance Exhaust with ACM Test Pipes and BPM Sport Stage II Dev-Tune - Proper engine warm up, 12-monthly oil change, Castrol TWS 10w-60
2014 F15 X5 3.0d

Last edited by aussiem3; 03-10-2012 at 05:39 PM.
aussiem3 is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      07-30-2013, 07:06 AM   #13
MMMMM3
First Lieutenant
 
MMMMM3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Jerez Black e90 M3 DCT
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia

Posts: 335
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveDee View Post
Before doing an ESS tune I often had pinging which has since totally disappeared and economy has improved.

I tried all brands of premium unleaded and often found BP ultimate to give slightly better results than Shell 98 or Caltex 98.

Has anyone found the same problem or have a preferred fuel?
Pinging was driving me nuts after I filled up with Vortex98 recently. When it was down to a quarter tank, filled up with BP Ultimate, and the pinging is so much better.

I found the following info on another forum:
"Basically there are two types of 98 Octane fuels on the market, high aromatic and low aromatic. In high aromatic fuels the octane is raised by adding benzene derivatives such as Toluene. Low aromatic fuels are produced by refining the fuel to a higher degree so these types of octane boosters are not required. These fuels contain more aliphatic compounds.

Optimax is a high aromatic fuel and BP ultimate is a low aromatic fuel. These fuels behave very differently during the combustion process. Aromatic compounds take longer to burn and tend not to completely burn during the combustion process. This is why you can see soot on the rear of you car when using high aromatic fuels."

Can someone confirm if this is true?
MMMMM3 is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      07-30-2013, 09:01 PM   #14
EarthboundMisfit
Private First Class
 
EarthboundMisfit's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brisbane

Posts: 111
iTrader: (0)

Can't say that I've noticed pinging, and have only ever used BP Ultimate in the car. For what it's worth, I've averaged 16.7L/100km over the last 12 months.
Attached Images
 
EarthboundMisfit is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      07-30-2013, 09:28 PM   #15
jmo
Enlisted Member
 
Drives: BMW M3 E90
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia

Posts: 44
iTrader: (0)

I'm averaging 12.1 DCT 08' E90 stock tune
jmo is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      07-31-2013, 12:16 AM   #16
drjekl
Captain
 
Drives: E92 335i
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Oz

Posts: 788
iTrader: (0)

Hmm FWIW I'm using 12.5L 100 in my 335i which is pushing ~ 270kw atw on V Power in suburban/city driving (it was mid 10's when stock)

Sounds like the M's are slightly thirstier in comparison, but worthwhile with that noise
drjekl is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-31-2013, 05:27 AM   #17
MMMMM3
First Lieutenant
 
MMMMM3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Jerez Black e90 M3 DCT
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia

Posts: 335
iTrader: (0)

I'm around 14L/100km. Will be sticking with BP Ultimate from now on, car sounds so much better on it.
MMMMM3 is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      07-31-2013, 05:40 AM   #18
DaveDee
When there's no problem more power is the solution
 
DaveDee's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3 Edition M-DCT
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gold Coast Australia

Posts: 665
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Send a message via Skype™ to DaveDee
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMMMM3 View Post
Pinging was driving me nuts after I filled up with Vortex98 recently. When it was down to a quarter tank, filled up with BP Ultimate, and the pinging is so much better.

I found the following info on another forum:
"Basically there are two types of 98 Octane fuels on the market, high aromatic and low aromatic. In high aromatic fuels the octane is raised by adding benzene derivatives such as Toluene. Low aromatic fuels are produced by refining the fuel to a higher degree so these types of octane boosters are not required. These fuels contain more aliphatic compounds.

Optimax is a high aromatic fuel and BP ultimate is a low aromatic fuel. These fuels behave very differently during the combustion process. Aromatic compounds take longer to burn and tend not to completely burn during the combustion process. This is why you can see soot on the rear of you car when using high aromatic fuels."

Can someone confirm if this is true?
This is really interesting, would be good if anyone had some further info, the findings so far seem consistent. Shell seems to be the worst and the car seems not to run as well on it, Caltex is mid way but more attractive due to the supermarket discounting at the moment, but BP seems to run the best, and constantly.
Before supercharging I was getting in the mid 12 litres per 100, since supercharging I'm only up to a consistent 13.2 litres per 100, hasn't changed in 4 months. After changing (for trial purposes) from a Gintani X pipe to a OE xipe witth primary cat delete, fuel economy is the same but there is a substantial power loss. Can't believe what a difference a good X pipe makes (both sound and power)
__________________
DaveDee is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      10-12-2013, 07:11 PM   #19
Goombeh
Private First Class
 
Goombeh's Avatar
 
Drives: 1M, GTR, GSXR
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Aus

Posts: 144
iTrader: (0)

This is interesting, I was enquiring on the same thing for my 1M and was advised that the 1M has a very effective knock sensor, I would have thought the M3's V8 would also.
Goombeh is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      11-11-2013, 10:22 PM   #20
Stilly
Enlisted Member
 
Stilly's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 M3 Pure (comp pack)
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Townsville

Posts: 30
iTrader: (0)

Any thoughts on E10 in the M3?
Stilly is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      11-15-2013, 07:47 AM   #21
CON G
Private
 
CON G's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 E90 M3, 1995 E36 M3
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: PERTH WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Posts: 95
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
1994 E36 M3 COUPE  [0.00]
2010 E90 M3  [0.00]
I would think for any forced induction engine E85 if you can get it is a must. It means your mechanic can set a greater advance on the timing and result in substantial power gains. On 98 RON my old twin turbo LS2 produced 530rwhp on E85 I was told that 600 would be achievable. Mind you on a stock bottom end that woudnt be that smart. Still if your tracking a forced induction engine E85 would mean less detonation, less heat, less issues.
__________________


CON G is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
      11-18-2013, 09:56 PM   #22
MMMMM3
First Lieutenant
 
MMMMM3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Jerez Black e90 M3 DCT
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia

Posts: 335
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stilly View Post
Any thoughts on E10 in the M3?
I'd never do it, but the sticker inside the petrol flap says you can. If you switch from e10 to no ethanol fuel - water can precipitate out of the fuel apparently.
MMMMM3 is offline   Australia
0
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST