FORUMS
- 5
![]() |
|
![]() |
| 02-20-2012, 05:03 PM | #1 |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
E92 dyno results!
Hello guys, well after a much needed dyno i finally cruised to AA to get a dyno for my M, the mods are listed in my signature and the dyno sheet will be posted asap, waiting for the shop to email it to me. What do you guys think, i know mustang dynos read somewhat lower. I was told the power being made was just about right and pretty good. The car made 354whp, cant remember the torque but i'll post the dyno sheet soon.
__________________
///E92 M3 AA filter/pulley/catless xpipe/tune, AE exhaust
|
|
|
|
| 02-20-2012, 07:15 PM | #3 |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 08 e92 M3 6MT, 08 e90 328xi Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 688
iTrader: (2)
|
Seems low even for a mustang dyno. My car with oem exhaust mod, Turner Test pipes, OETune and drop in filter made 375whp on a mustang.
__________________
2008 Alpine White E92 ///M3
|
![]() |
|
| 02-20-2012, 07:33 PM | #4 |
|
Second Lieutenant
![]() |
This seems to be more in line. The tune/exhaust mod alone should give you at least 30 whp from what I've seen and read. 330-350 seems to be the baseline run for these cars ..weak or strong. Am i wrong in this?
__________________
///M3 E92
Alpine White, Carbon Fiber Roof, Fox Red |
|
|
|
| 02-20-2012, 08:02 PM | #5 |
|
Second Lieutenant
![]() |
What's the conversion from the mustang dyno to a dynojet?
I got 354 WHP with Akra axleback and drop in filter on a dyno jet. So curious to see the comparison with equivalent dyno readings.
__________________
2011 e92 JzB 6MT
Akrapovic Evolution, ESS Tune, UUC SSK w/ DSSR, Stoptech SS brake lines, Eibach springs, OEM gloss black kidney grills, keyhole delete, LUX H8 3.0, full front clear bra, 20% tint, Macht Schenll Stud Conversion, Apex ARC-8 18x9.5/10 w/ 265/35 & 285/30 AD08's |
|
|
|
| 02-20-2012, 09:08 PM | #6 | |
|
Major
![]() Drives: '11 M3 MW/FR - '12 M3 FO/SC Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
|
Quote:
Really all that matters is what it made before and after the mods on the same dyno in similar conditions...preferably even on the same tank of gas.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
|
| 02-20-2012, 09:24 PM | #8 |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
Im told these results would be equivalent to 375 on a dynojet, i was expecting more whp but it seems these cars like to run rich. I'll post the dyno sheet as soon as i get it from AA. The car didn't seem to pick up any whp running leaner. The xpipe seems to make a big difference, i was told they dynoed another m3 with their axle back exhaust, intake and pulley with a whp of 321.
__________________
///E92 M3 AA filter/pulley/catless xpipe/tune, AE exhaust
|
|
|
|
| 02-21-2012, 10:38 AM | #10 |
|
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
![]() |
Yomny,
Stock m3's get around 325-330 on our dyno. The only thing that matters is the difference between your stock number and the post dyno number. A +25 Whp gain is excellent compared to the best stock m3 run we have ever had.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
| 02-21-2012, 11:05 AM | #11 |
|
All I do is Win... Eat Race Sleep
Drives: F10 M5 Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jersey
|
nice delta man...Guys its nots always about peak Hp it's the "area under the curve" that matters and detla.
__________________
F10 M5 : ??? E90 M3 11.2 126.7 with a 1.8 60ft Street Tires |
![]() |
|
| 02-21-2012, 11:39 AM | #12 |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
The car feels really strong and that's what matters. The curve is very smooth and consistent, the torque is very linear which yields a good track car. Very happy with the work done at AA , they always keep the cars making peak Hp with safety as a priority.
__________________
///E92 M3 AA filter/pulley/catless xpipe/tune, AE exhaust
Last edited by yomny; 02-21-2012 at 12:19 PM. |
|
|
|
| 02-21-2012, 02:39 PM | #13 | |
|
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
![]() |
Quote:
It was great to see this beast on the Dyno and hear this motor rumble our building. This M3 makes great power and you can clearly see the difference throughout the entire RPM Band and Especially in the Mid-Range versus Stock. Enjoy the new power safely and in good health my friend. Can't wait to see this monster on the track. ![]() Last edited by Viral@ActiveAutowerke; 02-21-2012 at 03:09 PM. |
|
![]() |
|
| 02-21-2012, 03:37 PM | #14 |
|
Second Lieutenant
![]() |
I think they look strong, how does your car feel versus stock??
__________________
![]() 08' DCT CF Roof, nothing to fancy custom magnaflow exhaust amd drop in filter |
![]() |
|
| 02-21-2012, 06:01 PM | #15 |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
Appreciate your comments viral, like always, left happy from your shop, wanting more though lol. The car feels really crisp and powerful, punch in any gear and it just pulls hard all the way.
__________________
///E92 M3 AA filter/pulley/catless xpipe/tune, AE exhaust
|
|
|
|
| 03-02-2012, 12:08 PM | #16 |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
I decided to go ahead and do a couple of dynojet runs, for the sake of comparison and to help future discussions about the whole mustang dyno vs dynojet dilemma. The car made 396whp with 286 tq on the dynojet and 355whp with 254 tq on mustang.
__________________
///E92 M3 AA filter/pulley/catless xpipe/tune, AE exhaust
|
|
|
|
| 03-02-2012, 12:38 PM | #18 |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
That would be STD , can you elaborate on these terms a bit. I'm not sure what these corrections mean. Thanks.
__________________
///E92 M3 AA filter/pulley/catless xpipe/tune, AE exhaust
|
|
|
|
| 03-02-2012, 01:41 PM | #19 |
|
Major
![]() Drives: 08 E90 M3, 99 E36 M3 Turbo Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Concord, NH
Posts: 1,171
iTrader: (3)
|
STD and SAE increase or decrease the UNCORRECTED dyno output that your car is actually making under the current weather conditions to a uniform weather condition so results are more comparable to results from across the country or world. This is necessary because a car makes more power at 30 degrees than at 100 degrees F and vice versa.
SAE is just over 2% less than STD. SAE is the more common method of reporting. Both are just mathematical calculations applied based on air density and other weather factors. If you know one, you can determine the other. Your 396 rwhp STD works out to about 387 rwhp SAE, which is about right for tune, catless x-pipe, pulley and filter. Some cars do a little better, some a little worse. The octane gas you use can make a difference. You can compare in the Dyno Database. |
|
|
|
| 03-02-2012, 03:10 PM | #21 |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() |
My car stock on the Active Autowerke Mustang Dyno made 334 whp which(back when we did this in early 2010), Omar told me was the highest number they had ever seen on a stock M3.
|
![]() |
|
| 03-02-2012, 03:53 PM | #22 |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
I'll be done with the mods once the meth injection is ready and tuned, aiming to get about 400wph. The car was very consistent, all three runs yielded exactly the same 396whp. The only problem seemed to be on the low-end, the air fuel ratio was crazy and it's definitely felt, the car hiccups. I'll probably end up getting PROcede to fine tune these small areas and also to tune for the meth injection.
__________________
///E92 M3 AA filter/pulley/catless xpipe/tune, AE exhaust
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|