G35 unsafe!!!

ward · 10-28-2005, 05:37 PM

The list of unsafe cars points to two trends. First, the least-safe cars are cheap. However, some luxury cars have subpar crash-test scores. The Jaguar X-Type sedan from Ford Motor and the Infiniti G35 and M model lines from Nissan Motor received one "poor" rating each, which was alarming but not enough to merit placement on our list

taken from
http://biz.yahoo.com/weekend/leastsafe_1.html

wow, watch out for that unsafe japanese car!

deutschmann59 · 10-28-2005, 06:38 PM

It's a shame about how car companies build cars around features rather than safety. Safety should be number one, and I think that's what these reviews are trying to tell car companies. If you're on a budget looking for a new $10,000-19,000 car, that car should be as safe as a safe $90,000 luxury car.

But I guess having more featuers (like with Kia) or larger production output (like with Ford) is more important than safety.

There's really no excuse for an unsafe $40,000 car, though

romeo26 · 11-04-2005, 11:10 PM

thats what makes the e90 worth buying then the g35. for me its better to be safe then sorry, sure your car might be faster then mine, but iam safer!!

JamieA · 11-06-2005, 09:28 AM

I am not surprised at the Jag X-Type's performance seeming as it is built off the humble Ford Mondeo platform.

Broken1 · 11-06-2005, 09:49 AM

The E90 got 5 stars in the Euro NCAP? Right?

Anyone know what it got in the US NCAP?

10-28-2005, 05:37 PM	#1
ward Major General Drives: F Join Date: May 2005 Location: T Posts: 6,162 iTrader: (0)	G35 unsafe!!! The list of unsafe cars points to two trends. First, the least-safe cars are cheap. However, some luxury cars have subpar crash-test scores. The Jaguar X-Type sedan from Ford Motor and the Infiniti G35 and M model lines from Nissan Motor received one "poor" rating each, which was alarming but not enough to merit placement on our list taken from http://biz.yahoo.com/weekend/leastsafe_1.html wow, watch out for that unsafe japanese car!
	0 Tweet

11-06-2005, 09:28 AM	#4
JamieA Colonel Drives: E90 325i SG Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Adelaide, Australia Posts: 2,147 iTrader: (0)	I am not surprised at the Jag X-Type's performance seeming as it is built off the humble Ford Mondeo platform. __________________ '05 E90 325i 6sp Man SG 118,032km on the odo (retired) '06 E90 325i Step SG 121,021km on the odo (retired) '08 E90 325i LCI Step \| Space Grey \| Black/Burr Walnut \| Adaptive Xenons with HBA \| CA \| Navi Pro \| 17in mixed tyres \| 105,437 on the odo
	0

11-06-2005, 09:49 AM	#5
Broken1 E90 Addict Drives: E90 325i Sparking Graphite Join Date: May 2005 Location: Johannesburg Posts: 2,040 iTrader: (0) Garage List 2007 Mazda MX-5 [0.00] 2005 (MY2006) BMW 320d [0.00]	The E90 got 5 stars in the Euro NCAP? Right? Anyone know what it got in the US NCAP? __________________ Broken1.e90post.com / First Meet 11 June Photo's
	0

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

10-28-2005, 06:38 PM	#2
deutschmann59 Captain Drives: 2006 325i Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: e90post.com Posts: 735 iTrader: (0)	It's a shame about how car companies build cars around features rather than safety. Safety should be number one, and I think that's what these reviews are trying to tell car companies. If you're on a budget looking for a new $10,000-19,000 car, that car should be as safe as a safe $90,000 luxury car. But I guess having more featuers (like with Kia) or larger production output (like with Ford) is more important than safety. There's really no excuse for an unsafe $40,000 car, though
	0

11-04-2005, 11:10 PM	#3
romeo26 First Lieutenant Drives: e30 325 (no lette) Join Date: May 2005 Location: anaheim, cali Posts: 348 iTrader: (0)	thats what makes the e90 worth buying then the g35. for me its better to be safe then sorry, sure your car might be faster then mine, but iam safer!!
	0