BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > General M3 Forum (E90 + E92 + E93)
 
European Auto Source
View Poll Results: What is the M3 to you?
Sports Car 56 36.60%
Sporty GT 97 63.40%
Voters: 153. You may not vote on this poll

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-27-2011, 02:32 PM   #23
Pointerman
Second Lieutenant
Pointerman's Avatar
United_States
4
Rep
211
Posts

 
Drives: 2011 BMW M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Manteca, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkoesel View Post
Because a 911 S is not a sports car whereas a Cayman S is?

Maybe you would say "yes" to that, but the question is whether classifying them like that is even remotely useful and sensible. And then there's the fact that things end up being confusing as hell when you start talking about the GT3, which does not have a backseat.
Pretty sure the back seat is an option on the GT3. My brother has one and is installing a rear seat any day now. It just pops right in (well, almost).
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2011, 02:54 PM   #24
mkoesel
Moderator
United_States
183
Rep
13,840
Posts

 
Drives: 2015 SO/CSAT F80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canton, MI

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pointerman View Post
Pretty sure the back seat is an option on the GT3.
I don't think it is an option (I could be wrong), but yes it can be retrofitted. I know it is not an option for a GT3 RS, so it doesn't really matter either way. The point remains that there are cars out there whose seat count varies depending on the trim level. Another one is a TT - the roadster seats two but the coupe seats four.
__________________
A gen-u-ine BMW eff-eight-zero with them tandem clutches in the transmission and that dad gum sun roof on the top-a da cawr.
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2011, 03:00 PM   #25
sensi09
Lieutenant Colonel
18
Rep
1,767
Posts

 
Drives: .
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: socal

iTrader: (1)

I wouldn't call the M3 a sports car, but it's definitely faster than some so-called sports cars.
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2011, 03:03 PM   #26
duk
///M
United_States
42
Rep
2,967
Posts

 
Drives: 2011 AW/FR 6MT E92
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Jose, CA

iTrader: (0)

/sports coupe
__________________
2011 AW/FR 6MT E92 | Powered by Premier | Alekshop | ESS |
Rok n Peace Clothing: www.roknpeace.com

Appreciate 0
      07-27-2011, 03:05 PM   #27
Eau Rouge
Captain
Eau Rouge's Avatar
United_States
14
Rep
991
Posts

 
Drives: 2012 E92 M3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida's Emerald Coast

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2012 BMW E92 M3  [4.50]
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkoesel View Post
I would say this: a sports must be designed on a purpose-built chassis. An M3 does not fit this category - it is built on a "family car" chassis.

__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2011, 03:35 PM   #28
Erhan
Colonel
Erhan's Avatar
United_States
37
Rep
2,466
Posts

 
Drives: Cooper S
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Seattle

iTrader: (0)

Sorry, but who ever thinks M3 is a sports car, doesn't know much about cars.
__________________
2011 MINI Cooper S
previous cars: E92 M3, Z4MC, Z4 Roadster, E36 328 Sedan
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2011, 04:17 PM   #29
FVM3
Major General
FVM3's Avatar
113
Rep
5,739
Posts

 
Drives: e92 m3, f30 328i
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (2)

In Hong Kong, some say M3 is in the same category as Ferrari, Lambo as supercar
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2011, 04:24 PM   #30
cawest19
Livin' the M life
United_States
5
Rep
151
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 E90 M3
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Princeton, NJ

iTrader: (0)

I'd like to change my vote to sporty gt, thanks
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2011, 06:49 PM   #31
captainaudio
World's Foremost Authority
United_States
36
Rep
3,216
Posts

 
Drives: 335i E93 750Li
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper East Side Manhattan - Boca Raton Florida

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by christopherchenm View Post
In Hong Kong, some say M3 is in the same category as Ferrari, Lambo as supercar
The same people probably also think that Eminem is a musician.

CA
__________________

Drivers Club at Lime Rock - International Motorsports Research Center
Madison Avenue Sports Car Driving and Chowder Society (Only a Vice President)
Polish Racing Drivers of America (PRDA)
The Glen Club - Sports Car Club of America
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2011, 10:21 PM   #32
crackberry
Major
crackberry's Avatar
United_States
12
Rep
1,003
Posts

 
Drives: Porsche Carrera GTS (997.2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: southern california

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by christopherchenm View Post
In Hong Kong, some say M3 is in the same category as Ferrari, Lambo as supercar
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2011, 11:32 PM   #33
nirvanayoda
Second Lieutenant
United_States
11
Rep
245
Posts

 
Drives: 2011 e92 M3
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Houston

iTrader: (0)

I despise the word "sporty".

"Sporty" is a word used to describe a normal car that has small details sometimes associated with a sports car. A civic with a spoiler is "sporty". A cavalier with the z51 package or whatever is "sporty". A corolla with aluminum dash trim is "sporty".

An M3 is not sporty. It's a sports car. Or a sports coupe. It's not a "sporty" anything. An M3 is built for performance with a special emphasis on handling, and it's extremely fast compared to most cars (and is faster than some supercars from less than a decade ago). That qualifies as a sports car. Or coupe. Or whatever noun you want to place behind "sports". In fact, I guess you could even call it a sports GT. But it's not a freaking "sporty" anything.
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2011, 11:49 PM   #34
-=Hot|Ice=-
Been There, Done That.
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
United_States
184
Rep
4,727
Posts

 
Drives: 2013 BMW M3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by nirvanayoda View Post
I despise the word "sporty".

"Sporty" is a word used to describe a normal car that has small details sometimes associated with a sports car. A civic with a spoiler is "sporty". A cavalier with the z51 package or whatever is "sporty". A corolla with aluminum dash trim is "sporty".

An M3 is not sporty. It's a sports car. Or a sports coupe. It's not a "sporty" anything. An M3 is built for performance with a special emphasis on handling, and it's extremely fast compared to most cars (and is faster than some supercars from less than a decade ago). That qualifies as a sports car. Or coupe. Or whatever noun you want to place behind "sports". In fact, I guess you could even call it a sports GT. But it's not a freaking "sporty" anything.

If it's a "sports coupe" then why do the brakes suck for track use? Why is the cooling not sufficient enough?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaypod View Post
You sound like my buddies who have AMG's - Slam the gas, slam the brakes...
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2011, 12:15 AM   #35
captainaudio
World's Foremost Authority
United_States
36
Rep
3,216
Posts

 
Drives: 335i E93 750Li
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper East Side Manhattan - Boca Raton Florida

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by nirvanayoda View Post
I despise the word "sporty".

"Sporty" is a word used to describe a normal car that has small details sometimes associated with a sports car. A civic with a spoiler is "sporty". A cavalier with the z51 package or whatever is "sporty". A corolla with aluminum dash trim is "sporty".

An M3 is not sporty. It's a sports car. Or a sports coupe. It's not a "sporty" anything. An M3 is built for performance with a special emphasis on handling, and it's extremely fast compared to most cars (and is faster than some supercars from less than a decade ago). That qualifies as a sports car. Or coupe. Or whatever noun you want to place behind "sports". In fact, I guess you could even call it a sports GT. But it's not a freaking "sporty" anything.
After World War II when "Sports Cars" started to become popular in the US it was very clear what a sports car was. They were two seaters, usually open cars, had manual transmission, did not have power windows or brakes, and were two passenger cars, They were much smaller than and looked nothing like the full size American cars of the era and they were not higher performance versions of four door sedans. These sports cars were dual purpose. They were road cars and they were race cars,

Today that definition is not so clear when there are cars like the M3 Sedan that are based upon and are for all practical purposes visually indistinguishable to most people from a car that is marketed as a family sedan. Although these cars offer a very high level of performance and are taken to the track by thier owners the days of the dual purpose road/race car are long gone.



So is an M3 a sports car? Not in the classic definition but many owners use it as a sports car and it certainly performs like a sports car. I personally would categorize the M3 as a GT car. IMO the term GT car does not need to be prefaced with "Sport" or "Sporty" because that attribute is included in the definition of a GT car.




1954 4 Door Sedan



1954 Sports Car

CA
__________________

Drivers Club at Lime Rock - International Motorsports Research Center
Madison Avenue Sports Car Driving and Chowder Society (Only a Vice President)
Polish Racing Drivers of America (PRDA)
The Glen Club - Sports Car Club of America
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2011, 12:44 AM   #36
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
214
Rep
10,201
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pman10 View Post
Leather electric seats, Nav, 'comfort' suspension settings, back seats, large trunk, relatively heavy, poor brakes and brake pads, climate control/cruise control, heavy interior insulation, tire/suspension set up leaning towards understeer...

All of these add up to a grand tourer (or more accurately, a 'sports sedan'), not a sports car. That being said, I'm very happy with it.
I don't agree with this entirely. There are many sports cars that have all or most of these items. Come on a sports car cannot have climate control, does that mean heating and AC or just those with an automatic setting?

Also what production car does not lean slightly or even heavily toward understeer.

Now that being said I also think you are on the right track to distinguish one car type from another. You just have not hit the nail on the head.
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2011, 12:51 AM   #37
OC3
Havin' a blast!
OC3's Avatar
United_States
53
Rep
4,819
Posts

 
Drives: 2013 M3 E92 Jerez Blk DCT ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by captainaudio View Post
The same people probably also think that Eminem is a musician.

CA
__________________

BRP CW13 1:56 | CVR CW 2:01 | CVR CCW 2:02 | ACS 1:53 | WSIR 1:34
2013 E92 M3 Jerez Black DCT ZCP | JRZ RS Pro | Brembo | Endless | Volk TE37 18x10.5 squared | NT01/TD/ContiGrandAm | no other mods, nor weight shavings
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2011, 12:56 AM   #38
nirvanayoda
Second Lieutenant
United_States
11
Rep
245
Posts

 
Drives: 2011 e92 M3
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Houston

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by -=Hot|Ice=- View Post
If it's a "sports coupe" then why do the brakes suck for track use? Why is the cooling not sufficient enough?
Since when is a sports car or sports coupe defined by its trackability? And what is our basis of comparison? Do the brakes suck compared to Porsche ceramic brakes? Probably. Do they suck compared to 99% of other production cars? Doubtful.

I should note that we aren't talking about a "race car", which would likely be defined by trackability.
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2011, 12:58 AM   #39
crackberry
Major
crackberry's Avatar
United_States
12
Rep
1,003
Posts

 
Drives: Porsche Carrera GTS (997.2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: southern california

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by nirvanayoda View Post
I despise the word "sporty".

"Sporty" is a word used to describe a normal car that has small details sometimes associated with a sports car. A civic with a spoiler is "sporty". A cavalier with the z51 package or whatever is "sporty". A corolla with aluminum dash trim is "sporty".

An M3 is not sporty. It's a sports car. Or a sports coupe. It's not a "sporty" anything. An M3 is built for performance with a special emphasis on handling, and it's extremely fast compared to most cars (and is faster than some supercars from less than a decade ago). That qualifies as a sports car. Or coupe. Or whatever noun you want to place behind "sports". In fact, I guess you could even call it a sports GT. But it's not a freaking "sporty" anything.
I strongly disagree with what you wrote. The m3 is a compromise. It is designed to haul four people and emphasizes comfort. Although it may perform well, because ///m built the m3 with that in mind, it makes the m3 a sporty gt, and not a sports car.
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2011, 01:02 AM   #40
nirvanayoda
Second Lieutenant
United_States
11
Rep
245
Posts

 
Drives: 2011 e92 M3
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Houston

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by captainaudio View Post
After World War II when "Sports Cars" started to become popular in the US it was very clear what a sports car was. They were two seaters, usually open cars, had manual transmission, did not have power windows or brakes, and were two passenger cars, They were much smaller than and looked nothing like the full size American cars of the era and they were not higher performance versions of four door sedans. These sports cars were dual purpose. They were road cars and they were race cars,

Today that definition is not so clear when there are cars like the M3 Sedan that are based upon and are for all practical purposes visually indistinguishable to most people from a car that is marketed as a family sedan. Although these cars offer a very high level of performance and are taken to the track by thier owners the days of the dual purpose road/race car are long gone.



So is an M3 a sports car? Not in the classic definition but many owners use it as a sports car and it certainly performs like a sports car. I personally would categorize the M3 as a GT car. IMO the term GT car does not need to be prefaced with "Sport" or "Sporty" because that attribute is included in the definition of a GT car.




1954 4 Door Sedan



1954 Sports Car

CA
I appreciate your well written and thoughtful reply. With that being said, I do disagree with you on a point -- I'm not sure I agree that GT would necessarily encompass "sports" without the adjective preceding it. I'll provide a counterexample. Many people might consider a 550i a GT car, but it's by no means a "sports sedan", so "sports" isn't necessarily encompassed in GT.

I think one can define "sports car" by looking at the car's purpose. I'd propose this:

328i sedan/coupe -- compact luxury sedan / compact luxury coupe
335i sedan/coupe -- sports sedan / sports coupe
M3 sedan/coupe -- sports car

I do understand why people may disagree with me, but I don't think the answer is to call something "sporty". The answer is more or less to coin a new term, for instance "performance coupe", if no other term works.
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2011, 01:05 AM   #41
crackberry
Major
crackberry's Avatar
United_States
12
Rep
1,003
Posts

 
Drives: Porsche Carrera GTS (997.2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: southern california

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by nirvanayoda View Post
Since when is a sports car or sports coupe defined by its trackability? And what is our basis of comparison? Do the brakes suck compared to Porsche ceramic brakes? Probably. Do they suck compared to 99% of other production cars? Doubtful.

I should note that we aren't talking about a "race car", which would likely be defined by trackability.
No, you missed hot ice's concept.

The m3 is not built as an all out sports car, and he uses the brakes as an example why. If it was built for serious performance (a word that you used) and not everyday street use (which a sporty gt would be used for), then ///m would have thrown in better brakes on the m3.

If a sports car is not defined by its trackability, then the m3 gts and cls are not sport cars either, which is something I disagree with.
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2011, 01:09 AM   #42
crackberry
Major
crackberry's Avatar
United_States
12
Rep
1,003
Posts

 
Drives: Porsche Carrera GTS (997.2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: southern california

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by nirvanayoda View Post
I appreciate your well written and thoughtful reply. With that being said, I do disagree with you on a point -- I'm not sure I agree that GT would necessarily encompass "sports" without the adjective preceding it. I'll provide a counterexample. Many people might consider a 550i a GT car, but it's by no means a "sports sedan", so "sports" isn't necessarily encompassed in GT.

I think one can define "sports car" by looking at the car's purpose. I'd propose this:

328i sedan/coupe -- compact luxury sedan / compact luxury coupe
335i sedan/coupe -- sports sedan / sports coupe
M3 sedan/coupe -- sports car

I do understand why people may disagree with me, but I don't think the answer is to call something "sporty". The answer is more or less to coin a new term, for instance "performance coupe", if no other term works.
Because you are using a different vernacular or assigning different meanings to "standards" that everyone is accustomed to.
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2011, 01:42 AM   #43
stuka
Private First Class
2
Rep
140
Posts

 
Drives: 13 STI, 06 M3 ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkoesel View Post
Because a 911 S is not a sports car whereas a Cayman S is?

Maybe you would say "yes" to that, but the question is whether classifying them like that is even remotely useful and sensible. And then there's the fact that things end up being confusing as hell when you start talking about the GT3, which does not have a backseat.
I would take the M3 over a non GT 911 any day, speaking as someone who had a GT2 and a Turbo.

The GT cars are the only sports cars that Porsche makes today.

All other 911 variants don't even have the dry sump block that Porsche races with.

The GT cars are also the only ones that come only in manual so the pretender enthusiasts can't drive them, and before 997, no traction control for the hamfisted.
__________________
06 M3 6 speed CB/black ZCP
13 STI sedan WRB/alcantara
14 Evo GSR White/black
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2011, 01:46 AM   #44
stuka
Private First Class
2
Rep
140
Posts

 
Drives: 13 STI, 06 M3 ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
I don't agree with this entirely. There are many sports cars that have all or most of these items. Come on a sports car cannot have climate control, does that mean heating and AC or just those with an automatic setting?

Also what production car does not lean slightly or even heavily toward understeer.
996 GT3's has AC delete option.

Porsche GT cars do not understeer. They put in traction control in 997 because people kept stuffing the 996 GT2/3 into the walls or wrapping them around telephone poles.

M3's are GT's, no if's and but's.
__________________
06 M3 6 speed CB/black ZCP
13 STI sedan WRB/alcantara
14 Evo GSR White/black
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST