BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > Off-Topic Discussions Board > Photography/Videography
 
European Auto Source
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      06-08-2011, 11:18 PM   #67
1sikbmr
Brigadier General
1sikbmr's Avatar
46
Rep
3,283
Posts

 
Drives: E90 M3 6MT
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New York

iTrader: (14)

Ok guys this is my entry. Hope you like it

I call it "Crazy Lucky"



Uploaded with ImageShack.us
__________________

E90 ///M3 6MT Atlantis Blue - Fox red #TEAMMODE
ESS VT1-550|Volk TE37|Recaro|STOPTECH|Ohlins R/T|Mode Carbon GT4 Lip|Umnitza V4 |Agency Power/Sosi/ACM Test Pipes|BMW PSW V1|
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 09:11 AM   #68
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
165
Rep
6,792
Posts

 
Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN

iTrader: (15)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M_Six View Post
You could rename the contest Bokeh Birds.
__________________

Currently for sale: N/A
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 11:47 AM   #69
signes
Brigadier General
signes's Avatar
United_States
63
Rep
4,213
Posts

 
Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Spinnin at 8k

iTrader: (3)

Not a bird...

...but it still flies

__________________
08 E90 | Jet Black / Black | 6MT
Mods: RAC RG63 w/ Pirelli Corsa 255F/285R | Akrapovic Evo Exhaust | OEM Blacklines
Winter Setup: OEM 18s w/ Nokian Hakkapeliita R 245/40-18
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 12:40 PM   #70
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
165
Rep
6,792
Posts

 
Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN

iTrader: (15)

haha, nice.
__________________

Currently for sale: N/A
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 01:04 PM   #71
signes
Brigadier General
signes's Avatar
United_States
63
Rep
4,213
Posts

 
Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Spinnin at 8k

iTrader: (3)

BTW, struggling with the whole "bokeh" v straight shallow DOF. I think a lot of submissions are more the latter, with few hitting the mark on the former. Also results are pretty dependent on gear.

If the theme will be more liberally interpreted as really just a shallow DOF contest, I might want to resubmit. Thoughts?
__________________
08 E90 | Jet Black / Black | 6MT
Mods: RAC RG63 w/ Pirelli Corsa 255F/285R | Akrapovic Evo Exhaust | OEM Blacklines
Winter Setup: OEM 18s w/ Nokian Hakkapeliita R 245/40-18
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 01:12 PM   #72
M_Six
Free Thinker
M_Six's Avatar
United_States
125
Rep
5,070
Posts

 
Drives: 2012 MB C300 4matic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Foothills of Mt Level

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by signes View Post
BTW, struggling with the whole "bokeh" v straight shallow DOF. I think a lot of submissions are more the latter, with few hitting the mark on the former. Also results are pretty dependent on gear.

If the theme will be more liberally interpreted as really just a shallow DOF contest, I might want to resubmit. Thoughts?
Was thinking the same thing. Not a pure bokeh competition here. Although bokeh is not purely defined either. Seems wide open to interpretation.
__________________
Mark
Flickr

"I know rocks. Rocks are hard."
-T. Walter
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 01:42 PM   #73
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
165
Rep
6,792
Posts

 
Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN

iTrader: (15)

I'm confused... what makes you think that you can have good bokeh without a depth of field (preferably a shallow one)?

Doesn't bokeh only occur in the part of the scene that's outside the DoF? Having a shallow DoF helps increase the amount of bokeh.
__________________

Currently for sale: N/A

Last edited by Chewy734; 06-09-2011 at 01:50 PM.
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 02:20 PM   #74
M_Six
Free Thinker
M_Six's Avatar
United_States
125
Rep
5,070
Posts

 
Drives: 2012 MB C300 4matic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Foothills of Mt Level

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Depending which site you visit, bokeh can have many different interpretations. Some sites define it as the round, blurred light highlights in the background. Other sites define it as "any pleasing blur" or some such thing. Some sites I've seen consider any visible straight lines, blurred or not, to be "bad bokeh."

TL, khaye1, and 1sikbmr have the rounded points of light that some consider real bokeh, whereas dcstep's, paul's, and signes's bird images have the "pleasing blur" that completely removes any background definition. All you see is a greenish blur. That is also considered great bokeh by many sites. But many of the other shots simply have OOF areas with still discernible backgrounds (or foregrounds).

skinrock's guitar image, which is awesome, btw, would be a huge point of argument on many "bokeh" forums. Some would claim it has great bokeh, while others would say it has bad bokeh. Depends on what your personal definition is.

So bokeh is very much in the eye of the beholder. But if any blur or OOF is going to qualify as bokeh, then what's the point of having the term in the first place?
__________________
Mark
Flickr

"I know rocks. Rocks are hard."
-T. Walter
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 02:25 PM   #75
dcstep
Major General
United_States
65
Rep
5,023
Posts

 
Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [4.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by signes View Post
BTW, struggling with the whole "bokeh" v straight shallow DOF. I think a lot of submissions are more the latter, with few hitting the mark on the former. Also results are pretty dependent on gear.

If the theme will be more liberally interpreted as really just a shallow DOF contest, I might want to resubmit. Thoughts?
I think that we should let the voters decide.

I think that mere OOF starts becoming bokeh when the BG objects start becoming unidentifiable. There have been some entrants where the BG is OOF, but everything there is easily identified.

Your entry clearly and undisputably has bokeh, IMHO.

Better gear does make better bokeh, but by getting close enough with the lens wide open, even a nifty-fifty can produce some nice bokeh.

Dave
__________________
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 02:31 PM   #76
dcstep
Major General
United_States
65
Rep
5,023
Posts

 
Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [4.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by M_Six View Post
skinrock's guitar image, which is awesome, btw, would be a huge point of argument on many "bokeh" forums. Some would claim it has great bokeh, while others would say it has bad bokeh. Depends on what your personal definition is.
That's a very interesting example. I'd vote for calling that bokeh because the tuners and peghead are so obscured that, without the context of the guitar itself, you might not be able to identify what they are. The subject is part of the bokeh in this instance, causing confusion.


However, I agree that it's on the cusp of not being bokeh. The demarcation point between OOF and bokeh is hard to define.

Dave
__________________
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 02:41 PM   #77
rodi
. . .
51
Rep
2,400
Posts

 
Drives: your FACE!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta proper

iTrader: (-1)

OOF:

Bokakeh:
__________________
2009 135i | space grey | sport | navi | hifi | heated
dinan stage 2 software | bmw performance exhaust
kw v2 | hotchkis front sway | vmr v710

Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 02:43 PM   #78
- Paul -
Major General
- Paul -'s Avatar
England
179
Rep
7,274
Posts

 
Drives: see above.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Yorkshire, UK

iTrader: (5)

Garage List
2005 320D SE  [5.00]
2005 645  [4.50]
Wiki

In photography, bokeh (play /ˈboʊkə/ boh-kə,[1] Japanese: [boke]) is the blur,[2][3] or the aesthetic quality of the blur,[4][5][6] in out-of-focus areas of an image, or "the way the lens renders out-of-focus points of light."[7] Differences in lens aberrations and aperture shape cause some lens designs to blur the image in a way that is pleasing to the eye, while others produce blurring that is unpleasant or distracting—"good" and "bad" bokeh, respectively.[2] Bokeh occurs for parts of the scene that lie outside the depth of field. Photographers sometimes deliberately use a shallow focus technique to create images with prominent out-of-focus regions.

Bokeh is often most visible around small background highlights, such as specular reflections and light sources, which is why it is often associated with such areas.[2] However, bokeh is not limited to highlights; blur occurs in all out-of-focus regions of the image.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 02:44 PM   #79
ShopVac
Not willing to take advice
ShopVac's Avatar
8
Rep
409
Posts

 
Drives: '08 335xi cpe - aero kit, 6MT
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2008 335xi  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by M_Six View Post
Was thinking the same thing. Not a pure bokeh competition here. Although bokeh is not purely defined either. Seems wide open to interpretation.
I refuse to submit until I fully understand what it is, and the submissions so far have me confused. I'm really struggling with this one.

Rodi's and Paul's examples above should help some...but I'm glad I'm not the only one that doesn't get it.
__________________

- Joey
| 2008 BMW 335xi | 2006 MINI Cooper S Vert | 2011 Ford Edge Limited | 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland Diesel |
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 02:51 PM   #80
M_Six
Free Thinker
M_Six's Avatar
United_States
125
Rep
5,070
Posts

 
Drives: 2012 MB C300 4matic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Foothills of Mt Level

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Very nice, rodi. Good examples and the second pic is way cool.
__________________
Mark
Flickr

"I know rocks. Rocks are hard."
-T. Walter
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 04:09 PM   #81
khaye1
Colonel
khaye1's Avatar
Philippines
37
Rep
2,690
Posts

 
Drives: '12 MW 335i
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (7)

rodi: that second pic is money!
__________________
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 04:17 PM   #82
rodi
. . .
51
Rep
2,400
Posts

 
Drives: your FACE!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta proper

iTrader: (-1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by khaye1 View Post
rodi: that second pic is money!
that 200/2 is money!

and thanks, Mark!
__________________
2009 135i | space grey | sport | navi | hifi | heated
dinan stage 2 software | bmw performance exhaust
kw v2 | hotchkis front sway | vmr v710

Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 04:19 PM   #83
Activ
First Lieutenant
Activ's Avatar
8
Rep
309
Posts

 
Drives: Black e92 335i
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sacramento

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShopVac View Post
I refuse to submit until I fully understand what it is, and the submissions so far have me confused. I'm really struggling with this one.

Rodi's and Paul's examples above should help some...but I'm glad I'm not the only one that doesn't get it.
It was confusing for me too when I first fount out about it, but it was because I was over thinking it
Here lemme grab some bokeh for you
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3175/...08816a23_z.jpg

The hexagon/circle figures is the bokeh. Put simply. It's basically the background/foreground being out of focus... But a little more complicated than that obviously.

Rodi that second shot is really nice, actually all of them are really good, can't wait for the voting
__________________
Trevor Thompson :: Activ Films
Facebook Youtube Flickr
EuroSunday :: Contributing Photographer/Videographer
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 08:32 PM   #84
- Paul -
Major General
- Paul -'s Avatar
England
179
Rep
7,274
Posts

 
Drives: see above.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Yorkshire, UK

iTrader: (5)

Garage List
2005 320D SE  [5.00]
2005 645  [4.50]
Changed my submission as suits the bokeh theme better - consensus of opinion seems to be that there has to be the shape of "bokeh" for it to be bokeh and not just oof. There are quite a few photos on here that do not fit into this. Mine was one of them (until I changed it)
__________________
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 08:55 PM   #85
dcstep
Major General
United_States
65
Rep
5,023
Posts

 
Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [4.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Activ View Post
...

The hexagon/circle figures is the bokeh. Put simply. It's basically the background/foreground being out of focus... But a little more complicated than that obviously....
Yes, that's one example of bokeh. Aperture shaped distortion is something that many of would try to avoid. Still, it's bokeh.

Dave
__________________
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 09:09 PM   #86
skinrock
Agent Smith
skinrock's Avatar
46
Rep
2,860
Posts

 
Drives: 2013 Fusion AWD
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The Matrix

iTrader: (9)

Garage List
2007 335i  [3.45]
Quote:
Originally Posted by M_Six View Post
skinrock's guitar image, which is awesome, btw, would be a huge point of argument on many "bokeh" forums. Some would claim it has great bokeh, while others would say it has bad bokeh. Depends on what your personal definition is.
Glad you liked it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcstep View Post
That's a very interesting example. I'd vote for calling that bokeh because the tuners and peghead are so obscured that, without the context of the guitar itself, you might not be able to identify what they are. The subject is part of the bokeh in this instance, causing confusion.


However, I agree that it's on the cusp of not being bokeh. The demarcation point between OOF and bokeh is hard to define.

Dave
I don't agree that you can separate them, though. Bokeh just describes how the out of focus areas are rendered. In my opinion, pleasing bokeh should act as a backdrop for your subject. When the subject is on a flat plane, like most of the bird shots, the background should have minimal details and draw your attention to the subject. It should almost stick out from the background. When you have bad bokeh, you have a lot of distracting, hard edges, and you begin to focus on all the rough out of focus areas instead of your subject. Just a quick example, I took this shot with my Nikon 105mm macro: http://www.rlsmithphotography.com/An...2_rPTbp-XL.jpg (same as my guitar submission). The green looks solid, but those were actually leaves from a tree in the background. And it wasn't a particularly lush tree either, I mean you could see through it. Also, it was about 7 feet away from the grasshopper, so it's not like it was just a single leaf blurring out the background.

Mine was a risky shot because, as mentioned, the subject as a whole trails off into the distance. That was my goal though. The actual subject is the bridge, which is in focus. The neck becomes very blurry and loses detail, but maintains it's shape which allows the mind to easily process this as a guitar, but directs your attention to the bridge. That's the idea, anyways.
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 09:18 PM   #87
BoomerE30
Enlisted Member
BoomerE30's Avatar
3
Rep
45
Posts

 
Drives: e36 325
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central NJ

iTrader: (0)


Guru Boissson Energie by Renatus Photography, on Flickr

Thanks for looking!

Last edited by BoomerE30; 06-09-2011 at 10:11 PM.
Appreciate 0
      06-09-2011, 09:21 PM   #88
rodi
. . .
51
Rep
2,400
Posts

 
Drives: your FACE!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta proper

iTrader: (-1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by - Paul - View Post
Changed my submission as suits the bokeh theme better - consensus of opinion seems to be that there has to be the shape of "bokeh" for it to be bokeh and not just oof. There are quite a few photos on here that do not fit into this. Mine was one of them (until I changed it)
i personally don't think it has to have any particular shapes. i actually hate the word bokeh. i feel like my mouth is taking a shit every time i say it. i prefer "out of focus renditions."
__________________
2009 135i | space grey | sport | navi | hifi | heated
dinan stage 2 software | bmw performance exhaust
kw v2 | hotchkis front sway | vmr v710

Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST