FORUMS
- 5
![]() |
|
![]() |
| 03-02-2011, 04:38 AM | #1 |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() |
2010/2011 Camaro SS
What are they rated at? Oh man I just ran one on the freeway, first run I was pulling away slowly and shut it off @ 140ish and second run he took the jump but I stayed with him head to head. It was yellow camaro SS with some black stripes along the side and had square looking exhaust. I thought camaro ss has oval tips. Oh and I was boosting 13.7psi according to my boost gauge. It was fun! I gave him thumbs up but he probably didn't see through his tinted window. Camaro SS is faster than I thought
can't wait to have perfect working meth injection with proper boost setting ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
|
| 03-02-2011, 07:10 AM | #2 |
|
Colonel
![]() Drives: '09 335i, '11 GTI DSG Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Raventown!
|
The SS has an LS3 Corvette motor. In the 6 speed it is rated at 426HP. In the auto it is rated at 400HP.
I have tussled with a couple and had no problem but, like any LS3 equipped car, the SS is quite easy to tune to over 500HP for a couple of thousand dollars. If you were running a Procede and it was close, he probably had something aftermarket. Out of all the muscle cars, the 11 Mustang GT is the one to worry about.
__________________
![]() 2009 E90 335i One mod: JB4 - Best 1/4: 12.782@108.54mph 2011 VW GTI/DSG See me for Industrial Electronic Repair. |
![]() |
|
| 03-02-2011, 08:18 AM | #3 | |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() |
Quote:
I have driven a 6mt 5.0 gt and that thing is fast as he'll. Not as much low end tq as our cars, even wihout a tune, but much Stronger on the top end. My tuned 335i with fmic doesn't feel quite as fast as the gt I drove. But again, my car definitely has much more useable torque |
|
|
|
|
| 03-02-2011, 11:35 AM | #5 |
|
Agent Smith
|
The RS package (which you can add to SS) gives you the "square" exhaust. I think it's more of a chrome trim piece built into the diffuser, but I could be wrong.
|
|
|
|
| 03-02-2011, 12:02 PM | #6 | |
|
Forced Induction FTW!
|
Quote:
Either way, while the new 5.0 Mustang is potent for sure, some publications have been pulling higher trap speeds in the LS3 powered Camaro: http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...07775a541f.pdf http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...mparison_tests I've driven both, and while they have similar peak power numbers (426hp vs 412hp, with the Stang having a lower curb weight to help offset differences in peak power), with the LS3 having a bit more of an advantage in the torque department, the big 6.2L really feels stronger all around IMO. Granted, it's a larger displacement pushrod motor, so low end torque is expected to be stronger (it is), that motor just gives the impression of having a larger overall usable powerband. Whereas in comparison the 5.0 feels more like a high revver (32V DOHC motor with VVT on both sides, it's to be expected). With that said, I prefer the chassis of the 'Stang as well as the visibility (no joke, the Camaro's visibility really is horrid all around), but with publications and private owners trapping at 111+mph in stock form with the new SS (at sea level of course), it's no joke. Just my $.02 ![]()
__________________
E90 BMW 335xi 6MT N54 - SOLD
Kawasaki Ninja 650R - Play Toy Former cars: 2009 Infiniti G37x, 2006 Subaru STI, 2006 Mazdaspeed 6, 2003 Nissan 350Z, 2004 Subaru WRX, 1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 2nd Gen DSM & 1990 Mazda Miata |
|
![]() |
|
| 03-02-2011, 12:17 PM | #8 |
|
Colonel
![]() |
Can't wait to race a Boss 302
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
| 03-02-2011, 12:58 PM | #10 | |
|
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 10,448
iTrader: (1)
|
Quote:
I would expect more?
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
| 03-02-2011, 01:19 PM | #11 |
|
Vengeance is mine, I shall repay
|
wait until the ZL1 rears its ugly head.....LSA motor and less weight than the cts-v with the same magnetic ride suspension.....you will have ALOT on your hands then...
__________________
Project: Vengeance[ACM's King of domestics, STOCK:501whp 489wtq | 2.9L whipple stock bottom end: 706whp 688wtq] Callies Compstar motor build:NEXT
|
![]() |
|
| 03-02-2011, 01:50 PM | #13 |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() |
ye that camaro ss was deifnitely fast, faster than my brothers C63. Second run I couldn't gain on him since even before I stage with him he took off! but it was fun, no cars, clear freeway, no cops
It looked insanely mean too, looks like new camaro's have angel eyes too? but they are gigantic angel eyes sick car
__________________
|
![]() |
|
| 03-02-2011, 01:53 PM | #14 |
|
Private First Class
![]() Drives: 2011 E92 335xi 6mt M-Sport Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 192
iTrader: (0)
|
I have a 2002 Z28 Camaro. You guys are talking apples and oranges here. Cliche but true "there is no replacement for displacement". Your comparing a drag race between a 3.0T and a 6.2NA. Of course there are ways to mod the hell out of your 3.0T and pull some sick numbers, but that same idea can be said for the camaro at a much cheaper cost.
Don't get me wrong but i absolutely love my new 335i xdrive coupe, but its not a pure Dragster. It's everything the Camaro isnt. |
![]() |
|
| 03-02-2011, 02:10 PM | #15 | |
|
Colonel
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
| 03-02-2011, 02:19 PM | #16 | |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() Drives: 2008 BMW 335i E90 6MT v5 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,543
iTrader: (7)
|
Quote:
For a SS to reach this... i don't know... but I would guess cam and heads at least. labor alone would put you at >2K... unless everyone's doing their own work... doubt it. Or supercharger at >5K Plus BMW has a great advantage with Meth. for a SS to reach good traps it needs low DA |
|
|
|
|
| 03-02-2011, 02:24 PM | #17 | |
|
Private First Class
![]() Drives: 2011 E92 335xi 6mt M-Sport Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 192
iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
yes you are right about the labor. LAbor alone would skyrocket the price of tuning a NA camaro. Gains of a good 100whp can be easily seen with any of the LS engines with bolt ons, cam, and tune. To be closer to the original statement i made, you would have to put a SLP 575 or the not yet released ZL1 up against a 335i 3.0T. |
|
![]() |
|
| 03-02-2011, 02:27 PM | #18 | |
|
Vengeance is mine, I shall repay
|
Quote:
1. it will be faster right out the dealer.... 2. pulley + tune >2k will walk over any n54 upgraded turbo or not 3. 7-8k you can change the blower to a bigger one and be in a HPF m3 league... not very costly for the sheer amount of power that powerplant can put out.... ask me how i know.....lol.....going from my upgraded turbo n54 to a CTS-V now ![]()
__________________
Project: Vengeance[ACM's King of domestics, STOCK:501whp 489wtq | 2.9L whipple stock bottom end: 706whp 688wtq] Callies Compstar motor build:NEXT
|
|
![]() |
|
| 03-02-2011, 02:29 PM | #19 | |
|
Forced Induction FTW!
|
Quote:
We also don't know the specs on said car; could be a very mild street cam, relatively small blower pushing <5psi boost, with very rich AFR's and conservative timing tables. Although typically the GM LS-motors take pretty damn well to making big power. Either way though, I'm sure it's probably a hoot to drive!
__________________
E90 BMW 335xi 6MT N54 - SOLD
Kawasaki Ninja 650R - Play Toy Former cars: 2009 Infiniti G37x, 2006 Subaru STI, 2006 Mazdaspeed 6, 2003 Nissan 350Z, 2004 Subaru WRX, 1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 2nd Gen DSM & 1990 Mazda Miata |
|
![]() |
|
| 03-02-2011, 02:30 PM | #20 |
|
Vengeance is mine, I shall repay
|
already spoke with D3 cadillac....this is going in my CTS-V after 10k....
![]()
__________________
Project: Vengeance[ACM's King of domestics, STOCK:501whp 489wtq | 2.9L whipple stock bottom end: 706whp 688wtq] Callies Compstar motor build:NEXT
|
![]() |
|
| 03-02-2011, 02:59 PM | #21 |
|
General
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2-325 330 2-335 2-Z4 2-135 X5d Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
|
^
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|