BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > Off-Topic Discussions Board > Photography/Videography
 
ESS Tuning
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-22-2011, 11:34 AM   #1
ChrisK
Brigadier General
United_States
85

 
ChrisK's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: IL


Posts: 4,864
iTrader: (4)

Anyone using a D90 + Nikon 18-200vrII

I have had a D90 for while now, and I use the Nikon 18-105mm with great results. Pictures are sharp, etc.

I now have the 18-200mm lens, and I find my pictures not as sharp and with much more noise in low light. I want to love this lens for the zoom, but find myself going back to the 18-105.

Anyone in the same boat?
__________________

2011 E92 M3: AW/BLK • DCT
Europäische Lieferung am 6. August 2010
Appreciate 0
      01-22-2011, 03:09 PM   #2
TL
Brigadier General
United_States
59

 
TL's Avatar
 
Drives: Happy on H&R coil overs
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Hub


Posts: 3,100
iTrader: (3)

Garage List
2008 335xi  [0.50]
Hmm, I never had that problem when I had my D90 with the 18-200mm VR I lens. Check out my flickr.
Appreciate 0
      01-22-2011, 08:04 PM   #3
hipnotic
Major General
United_States
76

 
hipnotic's Avatar
 
Drives: e92 335i
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Cal


Posts: 6,559
iTrader: (6)

Garage List
2008 335i coupe  [3.50]
no problem whatsoever
Appreciate 0
      01-23-2011, 09:26 AM   #4
ChrisK
Brigadier General
United_States
85

 
ChrisK's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: IL


Posts: 4,864
iTrader: (4)

I think I have the problem licked. I turned up the camera sharpening +2
__________________

2011 E92 M3: AW/BLK • DCT
Europäische Lieferung am 6. August 2010
Appreciate 0
      01-24-2011, 08:16 PM   #5
cooh23
Private First Class
1

 
cooh23's Avatar
 
Drives: e90
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: LA


Posts: 102
iTrader: (0)

they should be the same. Their aperture are the same but i'm sure it will make a difference if you're comparing 105mm to 200mm at f/5.6 with VR. Try using a tripod for the test.
Do you have ISO Sensitivity ON?
__________________
Appreciate 0
      01-24-2011, 11:16 PM   #6
Garduna
Brigadier General
Canada
51

 
Garduna's Avatar
 
Drives: 128i Sedona Red
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Toronto


Posts: 4,009
iTrader: (3)

I've had that setup for over a year now and no problems whatsoever
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2011, 08:16 AM   #7
ChrisK
Brigadier General
United_States
85

 
ChrisK's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: IL


Posts: 4,864
iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cooh23 View Post
they should be the same. Their aperture are the same but i'm sure it will make a difference if you're comparing 105mm to 200mm at f/5.6 with VR. Try using a tripod for the test.
Do you have ISO Sensitivity ON?
I have ISO set to Auto
__________________

2011 E92 M3: AW/BLK • DCT
Europäische Lieferung am 6. August 2010
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2011, 08:17 AM   #8
ChrisK
Brigadier General
United_States
85

 
ChrisK's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: IL


Posts: 4,864
iTrader: (4)

Everyone on the dpreview.com forums seem to agree that the 18-105 is a tad sharper then the 18-200..from approx 70mm+

18-70 they are the same.
__________________

2011 E92 M3: AW/BLK • DCT
Europäische Lieferung am 6. August 2010
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2011, 08:28 PM   #9
cooh23
Private First Class
1

 
cooh23's Avatar
 
Drives: e90
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: LA


Posts: 102
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisK View Post
I have ISO set to Auto
Try setting it yourself in order to have a true comparison. But if I were to have 1 lens to choose from between the two, I'd go with 18-200.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2011, 04:04 PM   #10
Jon D
Colonel
Scotland
47

 
Jon D's Avatar
 
Drives: F12 640i
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Scotland


Posts: 2,575
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisK View Post
Everyone on the dpreview.com forums seem to agree that the 18-105 is a tad sharper then the 18-200..from approx 70mm+

18-70 they are the same.
I tried the 18-200 on my D200 - great zoom range, but to me the trade-off was weird vertical distortion around 100mm. Not noticeable with landscapes, but a very odd mix of both pincushion and barrelling evident in architectural photography.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2011, 05:30 PM   #11
Litos
Banned
United_States
56

 
Drives: 2012 Challenger RT Junk
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston/Pearland


Posts: 2,900
iTrader: (1)

my 18-200 VR saw my D200, my D300 and my D40.

out of all of my camera equipment, i will NEVER sell my D40 or my 18-200.

they just get the freakin job done with little to no effort.
Appreciate 0
      03-01-2011, 05:34 AM   #12
Jon D
Colonel
Scotland
47

 
Jon D's Avatar
 
Drives: F12 640i
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Scotland


Posts: 2,575
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Litos View Post
my 18-200 VR saw my D200, my D300 and my D40.

out of all of my camera equipment, i will NEVER sell my D40 or my 18-200.

they just get the freakin job done with little to no effort.
I'm very pleased for you, but also a little curious as to exactly what a "freakin" job is.
Appreciate 0
      03-01-2011, 10:40 AM   #13
Litos
Banned
United_States
56

 
Drives: 2012 Challenger RT Junk
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston/Pearland


Posts: 2,900
iTrader: (1)

HAHAHA !!!!

it's the american way of saying the lens works beautifully

example: i freakin love this lens

it's a less aggressive adjective than saying "i fucking love this lens !!!!"
Appreciate 0
      03-02-2011, 01:10 AM   #14
geneatals
Ninja
Philippines
43

 
geneatals's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011.5 E90 M3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: So Cal (SFV)


Posts: 3,206
iTrader: (2)

d5000+18-200 vr for almost 18 months now, no problems whatsoever with noise...love this lens...
__________________
2011.5 E90 M3 AW l Black Novillo Leather | Carbon Fiber Leather Trim | ZCP | ZP2 | M-DCT | Navigation | Moonroof | 6FL l Pics/Mods
Retired: 2008 535i l AW l Black Dakota Leather l Bamboo Anthracite l ZPP l ZSP l 6FL
Appreciate 0
      03-02-2011, 03:04 AM   #15
Jon D
Colonel
Scotland
47

 
Jon D's Avatar
 
Drives: F12 640i
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Scotland


Posts: 2,575
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by geneatals View Post
d5000+18-200 vr for almost 18 months now, no problems whatsoever with noise...love this lens...
Noise is sensor and processor generated - nothing to do with the lens.
Appreciate 0
      03-02-2011, 05:27 PM   #16
Litos
Banned
United_States
56

 
Drives: 2012 Challenger RT Junk
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston/Pearland


Posts: 2,900
iTrader: (1)

D5000's aren't the best when it comes to noiseless shots.

go shoot at 1100-1600 ISO with the D5000 and it will look like you sprinkled pepper all over your pictures HAHA !!!!
Appreciate 0
      03-04-2011, 12:57 AM   #17
tolkino
Captain
10

 
tolkino's Avatar
 
Drives: '09 BSM E92 328i xDrive
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Toronto, ON


Posts: 821
iTrader: (1)

^^ True, but it is an entry level camera and it does what it needs to do
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST