BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > General M3 Forum (E90 + E92 + E93)
 
ESS Tuning
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-03-2009, 03:49 PM   #463
FStop7
I like cars
FStop7's Avatar
Vatican City State
96
Rep
5,059
Posts

 
Drives: M6
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Newbury Park, CA

iTrader: (3)

Also, if you think all it takes is weight reduction and an adjustable suspension to make an M3 drive anything like a GT3, you are high. As high as a kite. The 997 GT3 is the most brilliant car I've ever driven. My M3 feels like a wallowing, soft boat in comparison. No amount of suspension stiffening or weight reduction can change that. It runs much deeper, and you can only understand it once you've driven the car.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 03:50 PM   #464
ChinoOrtega
Captain
ChinoOrtega's Avatar
Guatemala
15
Rep
604
Posts

 
Drives: 991 C2S
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Guatemala

iTrader: (0)

guys, you're already going to put it along the gt3, and so much speculation going on about weight, price, everything, we should wait until BMW announces the final product with the right specs
__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 03:51 PM   #465
330CIZHP
Major
Canada
31
Rep
1,211
Posts

 
Drives: BMW 330 CI ZHP
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta

iTrader: (0)

Agreed. BMW has the ambitious plans to bring torquey, low-revving, two-ton plus M cars to America. BMW realizes how to have the best success in America, which is why M division is revolutionizing. It has already begun with the X5 M and X6 M tanks. The next M5 would be "super light" at only 4500 lbs. I think it might be a way for M division to combat obesity in US.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levi View Post
We can't say BMW hasn't the balls. They did have the balls to build 2 4WD, FI SUV/SAV's, the X5 and X6 M.
__________________
""A great sounding, responsive, high-revving, naturally aspirated engine is part of the DNA of a thoroughbred sports car. No two ways about it."

- Lamborghini on turbocharging
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 03:55 PM   #466
footie
Major General
footie's Avatar
No_Country
155
Rep
7,507
Posts

 
Drives: ????????????
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: BMW M3 will get a V6TT

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 E92 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by 330CIZHP View Post
Where did you get the 997.1 GT3 weight figure of 3000 on the dot??? That is completely incorrect.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...w/specs_page_2

It actually was well over 3200 lbs in a track test so the M3 GT4 will have both a better power-to-weight and torque-to-weight than the 997.1 GT3.

GT3 997.1 pwr: 3250/415 = 7.8 lbs/HP
M3 GT4 pwr: 3200 - 3300 lbs (estimate)/450 = 7.1 - 7.3 lbs/HP

The M3 GT4 will most likely be capable of running ~7:35 around Nurburgring. The E46 CSL ran a 7:50 with only 355 HP so I highly doubt the GT4 with 100 more HP will only be 10 seconds quicker.
The Mk2 GT3RS weighs only 3014lbs and has 450hp (i.e. even better PTW and superior traction) and laps in 7:33 and that time was achieved by none other than Walter himself, lets wait and see what Horst achieves in Sportauto's supertest. And you reckon that BMW's own estimates are wrong and it will actually go even quicker and this is based on the old CSL with 100hp less doing the same lap 10 seconds slower.

I bow to your better judgement.

But seriously, there is a world of difference than just throwing more power at something and expecting huge improvement in lap time, and truth me 10 seconds is a really big deal. If a GT4 does the 7:40 time that BMW estimates in the hands of Horst then I reckon BMW have done a wonderful job.
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 03:55 PM   #467
Levi
Brigadier General
Levi's Avatar
Czech_Republic
124
Rep
3,452
Posts

 
Drives: Alfa Romeo
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Prague

iTrader: (0)

For sure its a good sportcar, or better trackcar.
I'd just prefer yellow instead of red.
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 04:07 PM   #468
330CIZHP
Major
Canada
31
Rep
1,211
Posts

 
Drives: BMW 330 CI ZHP
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta

iTrader: (0)

My comparison was with 997.1 GT3 and not 997.2 GT3 since I only know the official lap times of 997.1 GT3 and RS. 997.1 GT3 was 3250 lbs with 415 HP and 7:40 lap time.


Quote:
Originally Posted by footie View Post
The Mk2 GT3RS weighs only 3014lbs and has 450hp (i.e. even better PTW and superior traction) and laps in 7:33 and that time was achieved by none other than Walter himself, lets wait and see what Horst achieves in Sportauto's supertest. And you reckon that BMW's own estimates are wrong and it will actually go even quicker and this is based on the old CSL with 100hp less doing the same lap 10 seconds slower.

I bow to your better judgement.

But seriously, there is a world of difference than just throwing more power at something and expecting huge improvement in lap time, and truth me 10 seconds is a really big deal. If a GT4 does the 7:40 time that BMW estimates in the hands of Horst then I reckon BMW have done a wonderful job.
__________________
""A great sounding, responsive, high-revving, naturally aspirated engine is part of the DNA of a thoroughbred sports car. No two ways about it."

- Lamborghini on turbocharging
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 04:26 PM   #469
spicoli024
Lieutenant
spicoli024's Avatar
United_States
5
Rep
405
Posts

 
Drives: '06 ZCP M3
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (0)

I feel like a kid at Christmas.
Savage, if we guess will you tell? LOL
Are you referring to the M3 Wagon?
Manhart Racing, built a V10 version, check it out here
__________________
///M3
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 04:34 PM   #470
HBspeed
Lieutenant
HBspeed's Avatar
13
Rep
583
Posts

 
Drives: 05 M3, 00 Z3MC, Boxster Spyder
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
People need to realize that many companies such as Porsche, Ferrari, Lamborghini and Audi represent their curb weights in a different way than most companies such as BMW, which is quite deceptive and probably intentional. For instance I'm sure most of you have come across the official numbers stating that the RS4 weights the same or less than the M3, something that is obviously not correct if you use common sense knowing there is no way it weighs even close with its AWD system. No matter how much you want to believe the "official numbers" you often have to find independent sources for curb weight.

Here is the weight for the US spec GT3 RS: http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/d..._RT911_GT3.pdf
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 04:37 PM   #471
Garissimo
Captain
Garissimo's Avatar
7
Rep
645
Posts

 
Drives: 4 doors, 6 gears, 8 cylinders
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hippie Town, USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levi View Post
Remember the M3 is a 3 series and not a real sportcar with two seats as the 911 or F430/458I are.
911 has rear seats.

Also, 911 GT3 997.2 does the ring in 7:40. GT3RS is reported to accomplish the feat in 7:33.

Finally, a lowered, stiffened, stripped out M3 that has the same HP as the standard model yet costs more than the standard model absolutely WILL NOT SELL in the U.S. I've talked with several senior BMW sales guys about this. Nor is it likely to do the green hell 25 seconds faster than the standard model. Look at the above GT3 times for general power-to-weight benchmarks.

I think an M3 with more power (more importantly, more low end torque), somewhat lightened but with most of the luxury items as options could actually sell here but I don't know if BMW would make enough money off it for it to make sense for them.
__________________
2013 Audi S6, Ibis White
2008 E90 M3, Jerez Black, Black Nappa, Brushed Aluminium, 6-speed, Premium, Tech, Cold Weather *sold*
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 04:55 PM   #472
330CIZHP
Major
Canada
31
Rep
1,211
Posts

 
Drives: BMW 330 CI ZHP
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta

iTrader: (0)

The 997.1 GT3 did it in 7:40 so I highly doubt the 997.2 will do it in the same time as it has been improved in just about every single area. It is lighter as well. 7:35 - 7:38 looks more realistic for 997.2 GT3. I have even heard that 997.2 GT3 RS is capable of going under 7:30.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garissimo View Post
911 has rear seats.

Also, 911 GT3 997.2 does the ring in 7:40. GT3RS is reported to accomplish the feat in 7:33.

.
__________________
""A great sounding, responsive, high-revving, naturally aspirated engine is part of the DNA of a thoroughbred sports car. No two ways about it."

- Lamborghini on turbocharging
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 05:12 PM   #473
FStop7
I like cars
FStop7's Avatar
Vatican City State
96
Rep
5,059
Posts

 
Drives: M6
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Newbury Park, CA

iTrader: (3)

Sometimes I wish the Nurburgring didn't exist, because using it as a comparison tool is so wrong. It's a great place for manufacturers to test cars, but it's so varied that comparing times from one day to the next (or even one hour to the next) is useless. And laptimes are only a small part of the story when it comes to what a car is like to drive.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 05:17 PM   #474
Jaypod
Brigadier General
Jaypod's Avatar
No_Country
64
Rep
4,962
Posts

 
Drives: Frozen M3, AM V8V, 991 GT3
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FStop7 View Post
Sometimes I wish the Nurburgring didn't exist, because using it as a comparison tool is so wrong. It's a great place for manufacturers to test cars, but it's so varied that comparing times from one day to the next (or even one hour to the next) is useless. And laptimes are only a small part of the story when it comes to what a car is like to drive.
+1
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 05:18 PM   #475
foosh
Major
foosh's Avatar
United_States
13
Rep
1,314
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 M3 E93
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Annapolis, MD

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FStop7 View Post
Sometimes I wish the Nurburgring didn't exist, because using it as a comparison tool is so wrong. It's a great place for manufacturers to test cars, but it's so varied that comparing times from one day to the next (or even one hour to the next) is useless. And laptimes are only a small part of the story when it comes to what a car is like to drive.
Yep, the variables are endless, and on a track that long they are magnified. Actually, I'm not sure 10 seconds means that much.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 05:35 PM   #476
Gearhead999s
Major General
Gearhead999s's Avatar
93
Rep
6,814
Posts

 
Drives: F25 2.8d(wifes)F82 M4
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FStop7 View Post
Sometimes I wish the Nurburgring didn't exist, because using it as a comparison tool is so wrong. It's a great place for manufacturers to test cars, but it's so varied that comparing times from one day to the next (or even one hour to the next) is useless. And laptimes are only a small part of the story when it comes to what a car is like to drive.

+2
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 05:45 PM   #477
vladberca
Brigadier General
vladberca's Avatar
Romania
40
Rep
3,797
Posts

 
Drives: '09 jetta tsi 6mt
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Craiova

iTrader: (0)

just waitin' to see the product released! after that and some good tests we can speak about the fact of being better or not vs a porsche gt3!
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 05:56 PM   #478
footie
Major General
footie's Avatar
No_Country
155
Rep
7,507
Posts

 
Drives: ????????????
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: BMW M3 will get a V6TT

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 E92 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by FStop7 View Post
Sometimes I wish the Nurburgring didn't exist, because using it as a comparison tool is so wrong. It's a great place for manufacturers to test cars, but it's so varied that comparing times from one day to the next (or even one hour to the next) is useless. And laptimes are only a small part of the story when it comes to what a car is like to drive.
I keep saying the same thing, for as long as I have posted on here yet people still consider the times achieved on the ring as gospel and proof that one car is quicker than another. The N-ring is a tool for developing suspension setting and little else, sure it's the ultimate track but it varies so much for minute to minute that no two laps are the same.

I hope it actually gets built and finally gets compared to the GT3RS to see how well BMW have done. I reckon the GT4 will be a brilliant product for semi-professional drivers that regularly track their cars either in club events or simply for fun, but I doubt it will be a product I would want to drive regularly on the road in the same way as I would want the drive a GT3RS daily.
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 06:06 PM   #479
spicoli024
Lieutenant
spicoli024's Avatar
United_States
5
Rep
405
Posts

 
Drives: '06 ZCP M3
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by spicoli024 View Post
I feel like a kid at Christmas.
Savage, if we guess will you tell? LOL
Are you referring to the M3 Wagon?
Manhart Racing, built a V10 version, check it out here
Next guess would be a competition version of the M like the e46 of yesteryear but not a CSL, at least in America. My guess is it would be slightly lighter with beefier brakes, tuned suspension and maybe some minor cosmetic details. GOD, this is killing me. I have gotten no work done since I came across this thread. Thanks Savage.
__________________
///M3
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 06:44 PM   #480
meevo
Private First Class
4
Rep
107
Posts

 
Drives: Cars
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Illinois

iTrader: (0)

uh it was already announced?
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 07:12 PM   #481
Mvez
New Member
0
Rep
11
Posts

 
Drives: 2005 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Louisville, KY

iTrader: (0)

this car isn't for us, it's for BMW motorsport. It's called homologation.
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 07:27 PM   #482
foosh
Major
foosh's Avatar
United_States
13
Rep
1,314
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 M3 E93
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Annapolis, MD

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by foosh View Post
QUESTION: With only 25 units/year, would this car even qualify as a "production vehicle" for the purposes of competition sanctioning? I confess that I am not up to date, but in previous times, there were homologation rules that required at least a 100 or more cars to be produced to qualify as a production vehicle.
Regarding homologation, I asked the question above several pages ago, and no one answered. It used to require many more units to meet various sanctioning body homologation rules.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 07:35 PM   #483
Lemans_Blue_M
Automotive Industry Insider
Lemans_Blue_M's Avatar
United_States
19
Rep
1,948
Posts

 
Drives: Lemans Blue M3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mvez View Post
this car isn't for us, it's for BMW motorsport. It's called homologation.


__________________
The best is yet to come...
Appreciate 0
      11-03-2009, 08:02 PM   #484
foosh
Major
foosh's Avatar
United_States
13
Rep
1,314
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 M3 E93
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Annapolis, MD

iTrader: (0)

PG, that's exactly what I remember, but people around here seem pretty sure about their 25/year production prediction, and if true, that seems like a cheap trick to pass off something as a production car.

However, LMB is now being his usual coy self regarding the Koni GS class, which is intended for primarily stock cars, but I have no clue what their homologation rules are. I guess it was embarrassing for BMW to lose to Ford (Mustang) in the season just ended.
__________________
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST