BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Suspension | Brakes | Chassis
EXXEL Distributions
Post Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-23-2009, 08:55 PM   #1
Private First Class

Drives: 2008 M3 Sedan
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Jose, CA

iTrader: (0)

Interesting feedback on Dinan's alignment settings

I'll start out by saying: No WAY am I trying to start a flamewar, diss Dinan, or in any other way besmirch the name of any company out there. I'm just relaying some feedback I got and wanted to know what M3posters here have to say, because I admit ignorance on this subject.

I have the Dinan stage 1 suspension kit installed in me '08 E90 M3 (fancy name for springs & bump stops) + camber plates, and was getting my first alignment since the installation. I brought it to a local shop that came highly recommended (don't want to give the name so as to avoid sounding like I'm shilling) and when dropping off the car brought them the Dinan suggested settings.

When I came to pick up the car, the tech (and I'm guessing owner) basically said he did it how I wanted based on Dinan's specs, but they're not what he would have used. He offered me a deal if I wanted to bring it back to have them do it their way, but lest you think he's just trying to drum up business he said if I don't like the new (their) settings, he'll put it back to the Dinan recommended specs free of charge. That suggests to me he's not just blowing smoke somewhere dark and sunless but actually does believe Dinan's settings are sub-optimal.

He said he also thought Dinan's note, that all alignment settings should be done with no weight in the car and a full tank of gas, was a little odd given that the car would be driven with a person in it (one would hope) and likely with light fuel at the track.

Anyway, I'm reprinting the Dinan specs here and would like to know what folks think. I didn't get his suggested numbers but I didn't ask, I figured that'd be rude ('Hey, thanks for the suggestions, I'll just bring these along to El Cheapo Car Haus...').

Finally, I assume I'm not violating any copyrights and such by reprinting this - it has no warning not to reprint the numbers and I have to assume they're not a secret anyway.

Dinan's recommended specs for stage 1/2 suspension kits:

Camber: -1.2 +/- 0.3
Caster: 6.5 +/- 0.5
Total Toe: 0.07 +/- 0.07

Camber: -1.5 +/- 0.2
Total Toe: 0.17 +/- 0.08
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2009, 09:39 PM   #2
RickyBobby's Avatar

Drives: M3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NorCal

iTrader: (2)

The only thing funny about those numbers is that they're pretty close to the stock recommended alignment settings from BMW. You would think that since you purchased the camber plates, they would recommend running more camber.
Was the shop under the impression that you were looking for a performance alignment? If so, maybe they were thinking to add more camber -and maybe 0 toe up front (which is actually within the range from Dinan).
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2009, 09:47 PM   #3
Major General
lucid's Avatar

Drives: E30 M3; Expedition
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

I'm pretty sure there is something in there saying that you can go up to -1.9 camber up front for "track use only". I have mine at -1.95 and that works out great. I went for ~0 toe front and a little in the rear. "Recommended" front camber is lower than -1.9 probably because they don't want to be responsible for uneven tire wear on the street...
Appreciate 0
      08-03-2009, 11:12 AM   #4

Drives: 06 M5
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

Originally Posted by wolftrouble View Post
I brought it to a local shop that came highly recommended
did you take to Custom Alignment by chance? If so Just trying to gauge the quality of the shop...

Appreciate 0
      08-03-2009, 12:30 PM   #5
TLud's Avatar

Drives: '12 Golf R
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas

iTrader: (3)

My guess is that Dinan includes the note to perform the allignment with no weight and full tank of gas to create consistent, repeatable results from car to car. I would further surmise that their numbers seem a little closer to stock because of this. Performing the allignment with a lighter car will result in slightly more negative camber back on the road. Still, I'd want a more aggressive setup than Dinan recommends.
'09 Interlagos Blue E92 M3 (sold to a good home)

Last edited by TLud; 08-03-2009 at 02:14 PM.
Appreciate 0
      08-03-2009, 01:25 PM   #6
First Lieutenant

Drives: 2009 E90 Space Gray M3
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

Originally Posted by Fuzzz View Post
did you take to Custom Alignment by chance? If so Just trying to gauge the quality of the shop...

One of the best bay area shops around. Have always had them do my alignments and mount wheels and tires with no scratches or issues whatsoever. These guys are pros!
Appreciate 0
      08-03-2009, 04:11 PM   #7

Drives: 2014 Shelby GT500
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC

iTrader: (4)

BMW's published alignment settings and ride height are all measured with about 400 pounds of weight in the car spread between the front seats, the rear seats and the trunk. If your dealer has the latest equipment, they put the car on the rack, load it down and the computer spits out a report that compares the actual settings with the factory specs.

Because of the preloading, you can't compare OEM alignment specs with unloaded settings.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,,,,,,,,, logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST