BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > Off-Topic Discussions Board > Politics/Religion
 
E92-lighting
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-17-2006, 01:46 PM   #23
MrSilver
Judge Advocate General
 
MrSilver's Avatar
 
Drives: e92 335i
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Buffalo, New York

Posts: 1,131
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2007 e92 335i  [0.00]
Send a message via AIM to MrSilver
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadBob
You might want to try reading them for yourself sometime instead of letting a lefty faculty member from Whittier interpert them for you.
I love when people resort to personal attacks.
__________________

'07 E92 335i "Over-Heating" and "Blowing Up" since 9-5-06
6MT, Space Gray, Gray w/ Dakota Leather, Dark Burl, ZSP, ZPP, ZCW
Comfort Access, Sirius Satellite (Howard is not optional)

'07 X3 3.0si - Black on Black, ZPP, ZCW, Step. - Wife's car
MrSilver is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 02:07 PM   #24
pawarrant
SECDEF
 
pawarrant's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Melbourne Red 328xi Sport
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Posts: 759
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2013 328xi  [0.00]
Send a message via AIM to pawarrant
Mr. Silver, can you show us where in the Constitution does it grant protection to non-citizens who made calls from a foreign nation? The plaintiff in the case in question were foreign nationals who could not even prove that their call was monitored. They should not have even had standing to file the suit.
__________________
2013 328xi Melbourne Red Metallic/Black Dakota Leather/Red Highlights Anthracite Wood Trim
Retired:2009 328ixi Sedan Montego Blue Metallic/Saddle Brown Dakota Leather Aluminum Trim
Retired: 2006 325xi Monaco Blue Metallic/Gray Dakota Leather Dark Burl Walnut Wood Trim
Retired: 2003 325xi Steel Grey Metallic/Black Leather Wood Trim

pawarrant is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 02:19 PM   #25
MrSilver
Judge Advocate General
 
MrSilver's Avatar
 
Drives: e92 335i
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Buffalo, New York

Posts: 1,131
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2007 e92 335i  [0.00]
Send a message via AIM to MrSilver
Quote:
Originally Posted by pawarrant
Mr. Silver, can you show us where in the Constitution does it grant protection to non-citizens who made calls from a foreign nation? The plaintiff in the case in question were foreign nationals who could not even prove that their call was monitored. They should not have even had standing to file the suit.
See pages 15-24 of 44.
__________________

'07 E92 335i "Over-Heating" and "Blowing Up" since 9-5-06
6MT, Space Gray, Gray w/ Dakota Leather, Dark Burl, ZSP, ZPP, ZCW
Comfort Access, Sirius Satellite (Howard is not optional)

'07 X3 3.0si - Black on Black, ZPP, ZCW, Step. - Wife's car
MrSilver is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 02:46 PM   #26
pawarrant
SECDEF
 
pawarrant's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Melbourne Red 328xi Sport
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Posts: 759
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2013 328xi  [0.00]
Send a message via AIM to pawarrant
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSilver
That's the judges opinion, not what I asked.
__________________
2013 328xi Melbourne Red Metallic/Black Dakota Leather/Red Highlights Anthracite Wood Trim
Retired:2009 328ixi Sedan Montego Blue Metallic/Saddle Brown Dakota Leather Aluminum Trim
Retired: 2006 325xi Monaco Blue Metallic/Gray Dakota Leather Dark Burl Walnut Wood Trim
Retired: 2003 325xi Steel Grey Metallic/Black Leather Wood Trim

pawarrant is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 03:53 PM   #27
MrSilver
Judge Advocate General
 
MrSilver's Avatar
 
Drives: e92 335i
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Buffalo, New York

Posts: 1,131
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2007 e92 335i  [0.00]
Send a message via AIM to MrSilver
Question: Where does the Constitution grant protection to non-citizens who made calls from a foreign nation?

Short Answer:

In the United States people have a reasonable expectation to privacy that is protected by the 4th Amendment. The 4th explicitly provides for:

"the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

So if the Government wants to tap phones, there is a legal mechanism for them to do so... it is called a warrant.

Otherwise any information they derive from an unlawful search and seizure will be fruit of the poisonous tree and will be inadmissible at trial as per the Exclusionary Rule.

I don't have a problem with the U.S. government wiretapping calls that are taking place outside of our borders. It is called spying.

But if they want to tap calls originating from inside the United States, they had better damn well have a warrant to do so.

>.<
__________________

'07 E92 335i "Over-Heating" and "Blowing Up" since 9-5-06
6MT, Space Gray, Gray w/ Dakota Leather, Dark Burl, ZSP, ZPP, ZCW
Comfort Access, Sirius Satellite (Howard is not optional)

'07 X3 3.0si - Black on Black, ZPP, ZCW, Step. - Wife's car
MrSilver is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 05:41 PM   #28
NFS
Major General
 
NFS's Avatar
 
Drives: 335i m-sport LCI
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK

Posts: 9,214
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pawarrant
To all of you who think the judge made the correct ruling...do you think if the U.S. obtained information using this method about an impending terrorist attack against lets say your kids school that it should not be used and the attack should go ahead as planned? wtf
You've missed the point.

The question in the US is the same as the one in the UK - should secret recordings be admissible in a court of law.

The UK security forces actually wish this NOT to be the case, because they don't want their methods to be controlled or revealed in any way.

Don't have any doubt, phone calls, emails and letters are being intercepted and read in both of our countries. If they warn about terrorist attacks those warnings will be heeded. It's just that the illegally obtained evidence will not be admissible in court.
__________________
NFS is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 07:42 PM   #29
CMD
Guest
 
Drives:

Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSilver
The Judge made the correct ruling.
This so called "correct ruling" will be thrown out on it's face in the U.S. Supreme Court. Mark my words.
 
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 08:16 PM   #30
pawarrant
SECDEF
 
pawarrant's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Melbourne Red 328xi Sport
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Posts: 759
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2013 328xi  [0.00]
Send a message via AIM to pawarrant
Quote:
Originally Posted by needforspeed
You've missed the point.

The question in the US is the same as the one in the UK - should secret recordings be admissible in a court of law.

The UK security forces actually wish this NOT to be the case, because they don't want their methods to be controlled or revealed in any way.

Don't have any doubt, phone calls, emails and letters are being intercepted and read in both of our countries. If they warn about terrorist attacks those warnings will be heeded. It's just that the illegally obtained evidence will not be admissible in court.
Actually YOU missed the point of this case. The case in question has put an immediate stop to our terrorist surveillance program. The lawsuit filed by the ACLU was not filed on the behalf of anyone in custody or facing criminal charges. It was filed on the behalf of a foreign national who isn't even sure if their calls were ever monitored. So you are wrong, the ACLU got a ruling to have the program stopped, not to have evidence suppressed in a criminal prosecution. I agree, any evidence not obtained pursuant to the U.S. Constitution should not be admissible in a U.S. criminal court. That's why these terrorists should be killed on the battlefield or rot in a military prison, not be tried as a criminal.
__________________
2013 328xi Melbourne Red Metallic/Black Dakota Leather/Red Highlights Anthracite Wood Trim
Retired:2009 328ixi Sedan Montego Blue Metallic/Saddle Brown Dakota Leather Aluminum Trim
Retired: 2006 325xi Monaco Blue Metallic/Gray Dakota Leather Dark Burl Walnut Wood Trim
Retired: 2003 325xi Steel Grey Metallic/Black Leather Wood Trim

pawarrant is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 08:17 PM   #31
pawarrant
SECDEF
 
pawarrant's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Melbourne Red 328xi Sport
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Posts: 759
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2013 328xi  [0.00]
Send a message via AIM to pawarrant
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMD
This so called "correct ruling" will be thrown out on it's face in the U.S. Supreme Court. Mark my words.
Agreed, lets just hope it gets ruled upon quickly.
__________________
2013 328xi Melbourne Red Metallic/Black Dakota Leather/Red Highlights Anthracite Wood Trim
Retired:2009 328ixi Sedan Montego Blue Metallic/Saddle Brown Dakota Leather Aluminum Trim
Retired: 2006 325xi Monaco Blue Metallic/Gray Dakota Leather Dark Burl Walnut Wood Trim
Retired: 2003 325xi Steel Grey Metallic/Black Leather Wood Trim

pawarrant is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 08:23 PM   #32
pawarrant
SECDEF
 
pawarrant's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Melbourne Red 328xi Sport
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Posts: 759
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2013 328xi  [0.00]
Send a message via AIM to pawarrant
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSilver
Question: Where does the Constitution grant protection to non-citizens who made calls from a foreign nation?

Short Answer:

In the United States people have a reasonable expectation to privacy that is protected by the 4th Amendment. The 4th explicitly provides for:

"the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

So if the Government wants to tap phones, there is a legal mechanism for them to do so... it is called a warrant.

Otherwise any information they derive from an unlawful search and seizure will be fruit of the poisonous tree and will be inadmissible at trial as per the Exclusionary Rule.

I don't have a problem with the U.S. government wiretapping calls that are taking place outside of our borders. It is called spying.

But if they want to tap calls originating from inside the United States, they had better damn well have a warrant to do so.

>.<
So what, the NSA and CIA do not file criminal prosecutions against anyone! We don't care about evidence being admissible in criminal court. We care about our intelligence agencies monitoring foreign nationals. Why do we need a warrant if we have no intention on filing criminal charges against someone. Its a war, not a criminal matter.
__________________
2013 328xi Melbourne Red Metallic/Black Dakota Leather/Red Highlights Anthracite Wood Trim
Retired:2009 328ixi Sedan Montego Blue Metallic/Saddle Brown Dakota Leather Aluminum Trim
Retired: 2006 325xi Monaco Blue Metallic/Gray Dakota Leather Dark Burl Walnut Wood Trim
Retired: 2003 325xi Steel Grey Metallic/Black Leather Wood Trim

pawarrant is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 08:23 PM   #33
RBBMWE46M3
blaupunkt
 
RBBMWE46M3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 335xi 6spman montego
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: THE REGION

Posts: 525
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 x5  [0.00]
1972 R75/5  [0.00]
2008 335xi  [0.00]
tastes great....
__________________
BMW ENGINEERS
RBBMWE46M3 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 08:23 PM   #34
RBBMWE46M3
blaupunkt
 
RBBMWE46M3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 335xi 6spman montego
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: THE REGION

Posts: 525
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 x5  [0.00]
1972 R75/5  [0.00]
2008 335xi  [0.00]
less filling....
__________________
BMW ENGINEERS
RBBMWE46M3 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 08:29 PM   #35
CMD
Guest
 
Drives:

Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadBob
Here is a picture of the judge.
She a bleeder.
 
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 10:17 PM   #36
Hunter399
Major General
 
Hunter399's Avatar
 
Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston, TX

Posts: 7,757
iTrader: (30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tl_boy
Good news. Again, there are other ways to know about terrorist attacks without invading the privacy of our homes. Again, we were warned about specific threats from Phillipine intelligence prior to 9/11 but failed to act. Again, the hijackers were on student visas, but never showed upto classes... these are red flags that should have been considered, and were not. What good would wire tappings do? My sister is liberal, I'm moderate. We argue about terrorism and other world events on the phone all the time. I'd hate for the government to arrest me, or one of us if they were tapping our lines and thinking wer'e up to something. Its a waste of tax payer dollars. Send moles into Mosques, milita groups, etc. that's what we should be doing.
If we have nothing to hide, why do you care of someone listens in?
Hunter399 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 11:07 PM   #37
tl_boy
Major
 
tl_boy's Avatar
 
Drives: tl
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: houston

Posts: 1,329
iTrader: (0)

What if I'm talkin to one of my hoe's, and its personal? Then?



j/k

I just dont like the idea of anyone listening to my conversations, no matter what they are about. Its just uncomfortable and an invasion of my privacy. I'm kind of a private person man, maybe not with you guys, but I am otherwise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hunter399
If we have nothing to hide, why do you care of someone listens in?
__________________

E90 Mods (work in progress): Euro Xenon Headlamps, 19" ASA AR-1's with Toyo T1R 235 fronts and 275 rears, Breyton style front spoiler, Breyton style rear spoiler, Huper Optik 40% Tint, TiAG with Black 'ette and Aluminum trim, Chrome grills, chrome exhaust, Hartge lowering springs, PMB Hyperwhites.
tl_boy is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 11:30 PM   #38
ages944
Captain
 
ages944's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 325i
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago 'burbs

Posts: 990
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pawarrant
Thank you p.o.s. ACLU and Democrats for helping the terrorists again.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060817/D8JI9A281.html
yeah, sure, who needs civil liberties? Overrated anyway... oh wait! That stupid Constitution thing's still around, ain't it? Damn, and I thought Ashcroft had managed to tear it to shreds already...
__________________
BMW : Sine qua non

Mods: Blacklines | Rear Seat Power Outlets | Rear Fog Lights | Ashtray Garage Door Opener
ages944 is offline   Poland
0
Reply With Quote
      08-17-2006, 11:40 PM   #39
dmitri
Private First Class
 
dmitri's Avatar
 
Drives: 330xi
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Morristown, NJ

Posts: 109
iTrader: (0)

Send a message via AIM to dmitri
I think alot of democrats are putting our lives as Americans in danger. Democracy is power of the majority, so why not work in our best interest, instead of questioning it????

If you go to Europe, there are guards with assault rifles at airports. Fuck all this "racism" nonsense. Every Muslim is not a terrorist, but why is every terrorist a Muslim??
:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
dmitri is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-18-2006, 12:35 AM   #40
a_moux
fuck around and get owned!
 
Drives: Jet Blk 325i
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago

Posts: 87
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2006 325i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSilver
Do you know anything about Constitutional law?
When Constitution was written, America didn't face terrorism. As this world changes day by day we might wanna think what is the best way to protect the citizens of this nation and if that means altering some parts of the Constitution, then let it be.
__________________
H&R Sport, 20% tint, chrome exhaust tips, 18x8.5/18x9.5 ASA JH8 w/ 225/40/18 and 255/35/18 Pirelli Nero Zeros
a_moux is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-18-2006, 01:18 AM   #41
shragon
Moderator
 
shragon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 325i SG Sedan
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA

Posts: 27,450
iTrader: (7)

__________________
shragon is offline   No_Country
0
Reply With Quote
      08-18-2006, 01:38 AM   #42
ages944
Captain
 
ages944's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 325i
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago 'burbs

Posts: 990
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by a_moux
When Constitution was written, America didn't face terrorism. As this world changes day by day we might wanna think what is the best way to protect the citizens of this nation and if that means altering some parts of the Constitution, then let it be.
The Romans probably considered the Huns 'terrorists'
__________________
BMW : Sine qua non

Mods: Blacklines | Rear Seat Power Outlets | Rear Fog Lights | Ashtray Garage Door Opener
ages944 is offline   Poland
0
Reply With Quote
      08-18-2006, 03:13 AM   #43
NFS
Major General
 
NFS's Avatar
 
Drives: 335i m-sport LCI
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK

Posts: 9,214
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pawarrant
Actually YOU missed the point of this case. The case in question has put an immediate stop to our terrorist surveillance program. The lawsuit filed by the ACLU was not filed on the behalf of anyone in custody or facing criminal charges. It was filed on the behalf of a foreign national who isn't even sure if their calls were ever monitored. So you are wrong, the ACLU got a ruling to have the program stopped, not to have evidence suppressed in a criminal prosecution. I agree, any evidence not obtained pursuant to the U.S. Constitution should not be admissible in a U.S. criminal court. That's why these terrorists should be killed on the battlefield or rot in a military prison, not be tried as a criminal.
No court ruling will stop terrorist surveilance.

I am quite sure that security agencies in the US and the UK operate outside the law on a frequent basis. The question is if it should be legal for police and other agencies to intercept individuals phone calls and use them in evidence without a 'warrant' - the judge in this case has ruled no which I kind of agree with.

As I said in my post the security agencies in the UK prefer it this way, because if wiretaps were a routine part of a police investigation, phone calls would be more guarded and if they were admissible in court, then their methods would become more widely known.

The recent terrorist arrests were brought forward because an uncoded message triggering the attacks was intercepted.
__________________
NFS is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      08-18-2006, 04:26 AM   #44
darter1979
Registered
 
Drives: 2002 325i
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MD, USA

Posts: 1
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSilver
I'm a Federal Litigator.

I would hope so.
I highly doubt that. If you really know the Constitution, you will see that there are no guarentees written to protect a person's privacy. The closest clause you can infer is the 4th Amend, which protects against "unreasonable searches and seizures". Wiretapping is hardly a search or seizure activity, rather it's a survaillance activity and the Constitution does not prohibits that.

It is via Common Law, not Constutional Law that the privacy laws in this country are based, and are used to prevent evidence obtained from unwarrented survaillance from being used in prosecutions. Since Common Law rulings are largely derive from past precedences as well as unique circumstances of each case, privacy laws are no where near as indispensable as real Consitutional laws. Since in this case, the federal government is using wiretapping for crime prevention, rather than prosecution, and the target of survaillance are foreign nationals, I see no legal basis for this ruling. I expect the higher courts to quickly overturn this left-wing activist judge's decision.
darter1979 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST