BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Wheels + Tires Sponsored by The Tire Rack
  TireRack

KEEP M3POST ALIVE BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER LINK!
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-25-2009, 09:22 PM   #1
BMW M Power Mexico
First Lieutenant
BMW M Power Mexico's Avatar
Mexico
455
Rep
377
Posts

Drives: E60M5,E821M,F15X5V8
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South

iTrader: (0)

Thumbs up 4 18x10 TR Motorsports + BFG R1s 275/35 Track Report

Just got back from the track. In a nutshell, this is THE TRACK SETUP for those of you who have limited budgets like me.

No rubbing AT ALL while driving on the track. Tremendous grip. My lap times went from 2:04 to 2:01. Car feels completely balanced.

I used no spacers for the front, 5mm spacers on the rears.

Regarding braking, had Hawk HT-10s in front and stock pads on the rear + ecs tuning steel lines + Motul RBF 600 fluid. No fade, no brake balance issues, nothing. Simply great.

Drove all day with MDM on + EDC on sport + Power Normal + Steering Sport, didn't go all the way to DSC OFF saw no need + afraid to trash an expensive car.

Only rubbing is at full lock when parking which can be easily avoided by limiting lock a bit with an extra parking maneuver. So - great setup and inexpensive - total cost for wheels & tires was about $2,300 from the tire rack + shipping - excellent service. Total brake cost was less than $350.

Had the car aligned for maximum stock camber which is about 1.4 negative up front. Wear seemed quite even, much much better than stock PS2s. Will post pics tomorrow as I am exhausted from today.

I only do tracks, no autocross. For autocross maybe, just maybe 265/18s would do a bit better.

Started with tire pressures at 34 and then had to bleed a couple of times to keep them between 39 & 40 which seems to be their sweet spot. Above 41 they start sliding a bit.

My car is a loaded E90 with sunroof (had no choice in that). With this setup I feel I am now on the top 20% of people at this track. Gave hell to 911TTs even on the twisties + kept up easily with a very well driven R8 and basically walked every other BMW in sight including quite a few M3 coupes, 135s, 335s, etc.

Car felt so good I am getting cocky!

Now the magic of the M3 is also in driving back from the track with all the settings on soft and feeling like you are comfortable in your mini 5 series. I just love this car so much. No other car in the world does so many things so well.

UPDATED BELOW WITH PICS.
__________________
BMW Car Club de México
¡Estás Invitado!
http://bmwclub.org.mx

Last edited by BMW M Power Mexico; 04-27-2009 at 08:06 PM..
Appreciate 0
      04-25-2009, 09:34 PM   #2
aus
Major General
United_States
887
Rep
9,031
Posts

Drives: Odysse
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seal Beach, CA

iTrader: (10)

Thanks for the report.

This sounds like a great track set-up.
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."

Last edited by aus; 04-26-2009 at 12:14 AM..
Appreciate 0
      04-25-2009, 10:24 PM   #3
schnell325
Bored at work....
schnell325's Avatar
Canada
887
Rep
5,376
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 GTS//2022 M235iGC
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Comox Valley

iTrader: (8)

Ok, back from the fitment test:

To review, this is the setup:

4 18x10 TR Motorsports ET 25 Wheels
4 BF-Goodrich R-1 Tires (275/35-18)


^^^^ a quote I found, just to help out!
__________________
Grey Matter:2008 E92 M3:608/425. SG/PS SOLD!
Dark Matter:2015 F80 M3:495/505. SOLD!
Anti Matter :2016 F82 M4 GTS
What next?!? A 2022 M235i GC- I must be getting old
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2009, 06:40 AM   #4
dawgdog
Colonel
148
Rep
2,278
Posts

Drives: 2015 M3, 2016 GT3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seattle, Wa.

iTrader: (0)

Are the spacers needed in the rear? I was thinking of this setup with 265 width tires. If you could post pictures that would be great.
__________________
2015 f80 M3, 2016 GT3
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2009, 09:23 AM   #5
bigjae1976
Major General
bigjae1976's Avatar
1564
Rep
8,074
Posts

Drives: 11 E90 M3 Individual
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (22)

Garage List
2004 BMW M3  [4.50]
2011 BMW E90 M3  [5.25]
2013 BMW 328i  [5.00]
Good info. I was looking at doing the 18x10 D-Force LT5s with 275s on all 4 corners.

I also like those TR Motorsport wheels. NEED SOME PICS!
__________________
2018 F30 320iX Melbourne Red
2011 E90 M3 Monte Carlo Blue
2004 E46 M3 Imola Red
2000 E36/7 Z3 Steel Blue
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2009, 08:33 PM   #6
m3larson
First Lieutenant
United_States
27
Rep
309
Posts

Drives: 2014 M6 Gran C 1997 M3 Track C
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ

iTrader: (0)

Thanks for the update!! How far are you from the track? I have to drive about 120 miles to the track so I wonder how these tires hold up.
__________________
The Verdict: Every other manufacturer should give up on building their own cars and just make M3s instead. -Car and Driver June 2008
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2009, 07:08 PM   #7
BMW M Power Mexico
First Lieutenant
BMW M Power Mexico's Avatar
Mexico
455
Rep
377
Posts

Drives: E60M5,E821M,F15X5V8
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South

iTrader: (0)

Thumbs up

Pics are attached.

I'll try to answer your questions:

1. The spacers are not needed in the rear. I put them on because the stock offsets make the rear track about 1 cm wider than the front and I wanted to preserve that.
2. This setup would definitely work with 265 tires too.
3. I wouldn't drive on these tires to the track - wear for nothing and you are screwed if it rains. I changed at the track when I arrived and before I left. About 25 minutes each time, no big deal. I think if you go by yourself everything would fit on the E90. I had a friend bring the E46 as a "support car" with all the stuff.
Attached Images
   
__________________
BMW Car Club de México
¡Estás Invitado!
http://bmwclub.org.mx
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2009, 07:31 PM   #8
Gladius
Two Wheels or Four?
Gladius's Avatar
United_States
92
Rep
655
Posts

Drives: '18 Perf Edition m240i
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (1)

What do you think about running 9.5"s all around?
__________________

Current: '18 AW Performance Edition m240i
Gone: '15 Mineral Grey m235i || '07 Silver Grey M Coupe || '11 Space Grey 328i XDrive || '08 SparkG M3 || '01 LSB M3 || '01 TiAg 330ci
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2009, 07:32 PM   #9
Dascamel
Lieutenant Colonel
Dascamel's Avatar
48
Rep
1,664
Posts

Drives: 2008 e92 M3, 2010 e91 328i
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bakersfield, CA

iTrader: (0)

Sounds perfect, I'm probably going to do the exact same thing!
__________________
2008 E92 M3 Jerez Black,DCT,Fox Red ext,Prem,Tech,19", ipod/usb, CF roof and trim
2010 E91 328i Space Gray,Black int, M sport, most options
2007 Montego Blue 335i (retired)
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2009, 07:47 PM   #10
BMW M Power Mexico
First Lieutenant
BMW M Power Mexico's Avatar
Mexico
455
Rep
377
Posts

Drives: E60M5,E821M,F15X5V8
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gladius View Post
What do you think about running 9.5"s all around?
Those would most likely work too. The 9.5s are ET35 and the 10" are ET25. With my setup the fronts barely clear the strut so I think spacers would be required in the front with the 9.5s.

You would also need spacers in the rear. I´d guess you would need 10mm in front and 15mm in the rear. With the 9.5s you would save a pound per corner.

However, the 9.5s are not available from the Tire Rack until June while the 10s are in stock. This was the deciding factor for me.
__________________
BMW Car Club de México
¡Estás Invitado!
http://bmwclub.org.mx
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2009, 10:40 PM   #11
M3V8Driver
Captain
M3V8Driver's Avatar
United_States
73
Rep
725
Posts

Drives: E92 M3 - DCT
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

iTrader: (0)

Did you get the TR Motorsports wheels in 18x10 from the Tire Rack? Did they give you a hard tome about fitting them ont he front? I'm thinking about going with the 18x9.5 up front, but the offset is 35mm, which, correct me if I'm wrong, tucks the wheel inward a bit compared to a 25mm offset (wheel width not withstanding). So, given the same wheel diameter and width, a smaller offset = more outward and a larger offset = more inward when mounted. Just need to confirm. I'd like to run 255/35/18 tires up front and 275/35/18 in the back.
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2009, 10:48 PM   #12
GregW / Oregon
Commander-In-Chief
2036
Rep
8,891
Posts

Drives: 2023 M2 Coupe, 2020 GLE 450
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lake Oswego, OR

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMW M Power Mexico View Post
Those would most likely work too. The 9.5s are ET35 and the 10" are ET25. With my setup the fronts barely clear the strut so I think spacers would be required in the front with the 9.5s.

You would also need spacers in the rear. I´d guess you would need 10mm in front and 15mm in the rear. With the 9.5s you would save a pound per corner.
Are you figuring spacers and longer lug weight in that calc? Those will weigh a pound.
__________________

Greg Lake Oswego, Oregon, USA
2023 M2 Coupe - Brooklyn Grey/Cognac/CF, 6MT; 2020 MB GLE 450
Appreciate 0
      04-29-2009, 12:57 AM   #13
BMW M Power Mexico
First Lieutenant
BMW M Power Mexico's Avatar
Mexico
455
Rep
377
Posts

Drives: E60M5,E821M,F15X5V8
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3V8Driver View Post
Did you get the TR Motorsports wheels in 18x10 from the Tire Rack? Did they give you a hard tome about fitting them ont he front? I'm thinking about going with the 18x9.5 up front, but the offset is 35mm, which, correct me if I'm wrong, tucks the wheel inward a bit compared to a 25mm offset (wheel width not withstanding). So, given the same wheel diameter and width, a smaller offset = more outward and a larger offset = more inward when mounted. Just need to confirm. I'd like to run 255/35/18 tires up front and 275/35/18 in the back.
I did get them from the Tire Rack and yes, they mentioned they couldn't guarantee front fitment but I went ahead anyway.

Your reasoning about offsets is correct.

If you are not going square and want to run staggered I think the 9.5s are better for the front because a 255 on a 10" wheel is at the limit of its fitment range. Since the 255 is smaller it probably will fit in the front without spacers but it will look more tucked in than my setup.
__________________
BMW Car Club de México
¡Estás Invitado!
http://bmwclub.org.mx
Appreciate 0
      04-29-2009, 12:58 AM   #14
BMW M Power Mexico
First Lieutenant
BMW M Power Mexico's Avatar
Mexico
455
Rep
377
Posts

Drives: E60M5,E821M,F15X5V8
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW / Oregon View Post
Are you figuring spacers and longer lug weight in that calc? Those will weigh a pound.
You make a good point. I didn't consider the spacers. Since you definitely would need them at four corners with the 9.5s that would offset the extra weight of the 10" wheels in the front.
__________________
BMW Car Club de México
¡Estás Invitado!
http://bmwclub.org.mx
Appreciate 0
      04-29-2009, 10:45 PM   #15
M3V8Driver
Captain
M3V8Driver's Avatar
United_States
73
Rep
725
Posts

Drives: E92 M3 - DCT
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMW M Power Mexico View Post
If you are not going square and want to run staggered I think the 9.5s are better for the front because a 255 on a 10" wheel is at the limit of its fitment range. Since the 255 is smaller it probably will fit in the front without spacers but it will look more tucked in than my setup.
Since the 9.5" wheel is an inch wider than the stock 8.5", wheel, I figure the 6mm difference in offset is such that the wheel track is still a tad outward if anything, compared to stock (there are 25.4mm in an inch).

So what do you think about the following setup:
FRONT
TR Motorsports MT1 18"x9.5", 35mm offset
255/35/18 Hoosier R6
Optional tire: 265/35/18 BFG G-Force R1

BACK
TR Motorsports MT1 18"x10", 25mm offset
275/35/18 Hoosier R6
Optional tire: 275/35/18 BFG G-Force R1

Both front and rear track should be wider than stock and rear should be a little more outward than front, so no spacers.
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2009, 12:52 AM   #16
BMW M Power Mexico
First Lieutenant
BMW M Power Mexico's Avatar
Mexico
455
Rep
377
Posts

Drives: E60M5,E821M,F15X5V8
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3V8Driver View Post
Since the 9.5" wheel is an inch wider than the stock 8.5", wheel, I figure the 6mm difference in offset is such that the wheel track is still a tad outward if anything, compared to stock (there are 25.4mm in an inch).

So what do you think about the following setup:
FRONT
TR Motorsports MT1 18"x9.5", 35mm offset
255/35/18 Hoosier R6
Optional tire: 265/35/18 BFG G-Force R1

BACK
TR Motorsports MT1 18"x10", 25mm offset
275/35/18 Hoosier R6
Optional tire: 275/35/18 BFG G-Force R1

Both front and rear track should be wider than stock and rear should be a little more outward than front, so no spacers.
I think that would be a good setup. You would be saving a little unsprung weight over my square setup above.

With the square setup I have I was expecting the car to be a little tail happy but it wasn't the case, the car feels very well balanced with amazing turn-in. Oversteer is not an issue and you can rotate tires as you please.

Of your choices I'd probably go with the 265/275 BFG-R1s over the Hoosiers to save some money and minimize understeer.
__________________
BMW Car Club de México
¡Estás Invitado!
http://bmwclub.org.mx
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2009, 01:13 AM   #17
Hellride
Private
Hellride's Avatar
United_States
2
Rep
90
Posts

Drives: 2008 E92 M3 Jet Black
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3V8Driver View Post
Since the 9.5" wheel is an inch wider than the stock 8.5", wheel, I figure the 6mm difference in offset is such that the wheel track is still a tad outward if anything, compared to stock (there are 25.4mm in an inch).

So what do you think about the following setup:
FRONT
TR Motorsports MT1 18"x9.5", 35mm offset
255/35/18 Hoosier R6
Optional tire: 265/35/18 BFG G-Force R1

BACK
TR Motorsports MT1 18"x10", 25mm offset
275/35/18 Hoosier R6
Optional tire: 275/35/18 BFG G-Force R1

Both front and rear track should be wider than stock and rear should be a little more outward than front, so no spacers.
I just placed my order for your option two. Only difference I put the front tire on a 9" wheel. I feel the track will be wider yet still close to stock ratio, the wheel/tire height will be smaller for both axles, but still close to stock ratio (they are closer together in size - but the rear is still larger). The speedo will be more off, but hey - reduced rotational inertia, right? And no spacers.

In any case, super excited. Have a track event - first this year - in a week and a half, then another at the end of the month. Can't wait, can't wait!
__________________
08 E92 DCT31.1 | JTBLK/BLK/CARBON LEATHER | CF ROOF | TP | PP | 18 | MEDIUM CERAMIC TINT | HARDWIRE V1
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2009, 02:38 AM   #18
m3larson
First Lieutenant
United_States
27
Rep
309
Posts

Drives: 2014 M6 Gran C 1997 M3 Track C
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ

iTrader: (0)

I am wondering since I wont do a square tire set up right now if I should still do 18x10 all around with the Cups sports or another tire or the 10 in back and 9 in front. suggestions?
__________________
The Verdict: Every other manufacturer should give up on building their own cars and just make M3s instead. -Car and Driver June 2008
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2009, 10:37 AM   #19
Hellride
Private
Hellride's Avatar
United_States
2
Rep
90
Posts

Drives: 2008 E92 M3 Jet Black
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California

iTrader: (0)

Can't say for sure - depends on how wide a tire you want fr/bk then put on the best size wheel for the tire and our offsets.

I don't get the understeer on this car that others refer to, and would only go square for the cost savings, but considering what I ordered was probably the best value it negated the square advantage IMO.

YMMV, but start with the tire size/width you want first and hope there's a wheel you can use in the correct offset. I didn't want the extra hassle of spacers but it may not bother you. GL.
__________________
08 E92 DCT31.1 | JTBLK/BLK/CARBON LEATHER | CF ROOF | TP | PP | 18 | MEDIUM CERAMIC TINT | HARDWIRE V1
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2009, 01:10 PM   #20
M3V8Driver
Captain
M3V8Driver's Avatar
United_States
73
Rep
725
Posts

Drives: E92 M3 - DCT
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellride View Post
I just placed my order for your option two. Only difference I put the front tire on a 9" wheel. I feel the track will be wider yet still close to stock ratio, the wheel/tire height will be smaller for both axles, but still close to stock ratio (they are closer together in size - but the rear is still larger). The speedo will be more off, but hey - reduced rotational inertia, right? And no spacers.
In any case, super excited. Have a track event - first this year - in a week and a half, then another at the end of the month. Can't wait, can't wait!
They come in 9"?
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2009, 03:19 PM   #21
BMW M Power Mexico
First Lieutenant
BMW M Power Mexico's Avatar
Mexico
455
Rep
377
Posts

Drives: E60M5,E821M,F15X5V8
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3V8Driver View Post
They come in 9"?
Maybe he used a different wheel. TR Motorsports on the tire rack are 8.5, 9.5 & 10.
__________________
BMW Car Club de México
¡Estás Invitado!
http://bmwclub.org.mx
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2009, 03:20 PM   #22
BMW M Power Mexico
First Lieutenant
BMW M Power Mexico's Avatar
Mexico
455
Rep
377
Posts

Drives: E60M5,E821M,F15X5V8
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellride View Post
The speedo will be more off, but hey - reduced rotational inertia, right?
Speedo error is a non-issue at the track.
__________________
BMW Car Club de México
¡Estás Invitado!
http://bmwclub.org.mx
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST