BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > General M3 Forum (E90 + E92 + E93)
 
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-20-2009, 04:35 PM   #1
AlpenWhite25
Private
 
Drives: Alpen White BMW M3
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thessaloniki,Greece

Posts: 59
iTrader: (0)

Why are all M3s rated at 414 Bhp ,when they actually produce 320 Whp at the Dyno...?

After my last post...when i have discovered that my M3 is making 326 whp i started a little research and found out that the average car is actually producing...that much.I would expect a 414 bhp car to make around 350-370 at the wheel on order to justify BMWs claim.After that i had a talk with my service store wich happens to have a lot of Dyno knowhow in the country,and they told me that they have had the same thing with E46 M3...There was a huge gap between the Factory claims and the actuall power they have measured with different type of Dynos..That got me ending up with the following 2 scenarios..either..


1)BMW MCars cannot be measured correctly in Dynos(for a number of reason i am not awared of...)

2)The M3 actually is Underpowered and does not produce 414 bhp we all payed for...(Wich is something much more serious for me).


I guess one way to find out is to have a Car of Similar Power-Torque-Weight on a Drag Race so we can come down to some kind of conclusion...It might be old-fashioned but it is the method to show the truth...

I really wanted to share my thoughts with you guys...and since we can have a post for that matter now,i would really like to hear what you think of this...?
AlpenWhite25 is offline   Greece
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 04:49 PM   #2
Splinter4784
414 little horsies
 
Splinter4784's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 M3
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Beverly Hills

Posts: 407
iTrader: (2)

yea that is weird

i think the engine is most probrably underpowered

imagine how sick it would be if it was rated at 414 horsies at the wheels

Damn, but in any case, however disappointing and frusterated i am with this claim

the m3 is still sick
__________________
Race Precision Inc
Splinter4784 is offline   Armenia
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 05:06 PM   #3
Griz
Lieutenant
 
Drives: 2010 BMW Escort Type M
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago

Posts: 498
iTrader: (0)

Roughly a 27% loss, seems a bit excessive. What type of dyno was this?

Edit: So, on the ESS supercharger thread, their reported baseline on a dynojet was 353.52 whp (17%). Their results seem more on par.
Griz is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 05:11 PM   #4
!Xoible
Banned
 
Drives: ....
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: .

Posts: 46,037
iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2008 M3  [3.50]
2007 335i  [4.50]
2008 528i  [4.00]
2006 Infiniti - G35 ...  [4.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
420hp and only 270 ft.torque is pretty pathetic if you ask me. You have to rev the heck out of the engine to even get to that 420hp for a brief second between 7500-8500 rpm.
it's actually not. given the size of the engine this is very impressive. Remember Ferrari Modena? it was producing 420 hp and 275 lb/ft of torque out of 3.9 liter V8 too that revved to 8500! BMW is pretty fucking close for $200,000 less, and few years later
!Xoible is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 05:52 PM   #5
mixja
Captain
 
Drives: 2011 E90 DCT Silverstone
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Beverly Hils, CA

Posts: 783
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlpenWhite25 View Post
After my last post...when i have discovered that my M3 is making 326 whp i started a little research and found out that the average car is actually producing...that much.I would expect a 414 bhp car to make around 350-370 at the wheel on order to justify BMWs claim.After that i had a talk with my service store wich happens to have a lot of Dyno knowhow in the country,and they told me that they have had the same thing with E46 M3...There was a huge gap between the Factory claims and the actuall power they have measured with different type of Dynos..That got me ending up with the following 2 scenarios..either..


1)BMW MCars cannot be measured correctly in Dynos(for a number of reason i am not awared of...)

2)The M3 actually is Underpowered and does not produce 414 bhp we all payed for...(Wich is something much more serious for me).


I guess one way to find out is to have a Car of Similar Power-Torque-Weight on a Drag Race so we can come down to some kind of conclusion...It might be old-fashioned but it is the method to show the truth...

I really wanted to share my thoughts with you guys...and since we can have a post for that matter now,i would really like to hear what you think of this...?
You can't really use dynos as an absolute measure - there are so many variables that using them as an absolute measure is silly. The only way to get some certainty around what you are asking is to take the engine out and put it on an engine dyno.

Use a dyno as a relative measure - i.e. get a baseline of your car and then if you make modifications or want to compare performance at a later date, go back to the SAME dyno and have another go.

The other thing to note is that some engines take a while to develop their full power - the B7 RS4 4.2L engine is a classic example - needs a good 10,000 miles or so...

I'd recommend where possible using a chassis dyno - it will give you a higher reading but generally the results are more consistent as you are eliminating the highly variable losses that can be caused by tires and wheels...on a chassis dyno, you are pretty much only getting drivetrain losses...

RRI has published two separate M3 dynos on their chassis dyno - both made just over 370HP at the hubs (only 10-11% loss), they also tested a C63 which made 401HP at the hubs (again, only a 11% loss)...

M3 Coupe - http://www.rri.se/popup/performanceg...p?ChartsID=768
M3 Sedan - http://www.rri.se/popup/performanceg...p?ChartsID=793
C63 - http://www.rri.se/popup/performanceg...p?ChartsID=795
mixja is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 07:57 PM   #6
AMJ_77
Captain
 
AMJ_77's Avatar
 
Drives: AW E92 M3 M-DCT
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton

Posts: 667
iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
Don't compare a 3 series to a Ferrari.....it's not even close. The M3 power is at the bottom of all it's competitor. Yeah yeah sure it's meant to shine on the track not at a straight line. But your average joe don't take it to the track, his race track is the freeway and stop light to stop light. Which put the M3 at a big disadvantage. The M3 dominance over competition ended with the E46.
Your right the accolades this car got are crap. Man why did I buy this car again? It is only faster than 95% of the cars out there, just not good enough...
AMJ_77 is offline   Canada
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 08:02 PM   #7
ChitownM3
Lieutenant
 
Drives: 2001 SS Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Burbs of Chicago

Posts: 489
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
Don't compare a 3 series to a Ferrari.....it's not even close. The M3 power is at the bottom of all it's competitor. Yeah yeah sure it's meant to shine on the track not at a straight line. But your average joe don't take it to the track, his race track is the freeway and stop light to stop light. Which put the M3 at a big disadvantage. The M3 dominance over competition ended with the E46.
LOL. Why are you on an M3forum then?
ChitownM3 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 08:26 PM   #8
FStop7
I like cars
 
FStop7's Avatar
 
Drives: M6
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Newbury Park, CA

Posts: 5,059
iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
Don't compare a 3 series to a Ferrari.....it's not even close. The M3 power is at the bottom of all it's competitor. Yeah yeah sure it's meant to shine on the track not at a straight line. But your average joe don't take it to the track, his race track is the freeway and stop light to stop light. Which put the M3 at a big disadvantage. The M3 dominance over competition ended with the E46.
Then leave, fagbag.
FStop7 is offline   Vatican City State
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 08:43 PM   #9
doba_s
Major General
 
doba_s's Avatar
 
Drives: M3, 1M
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Francisco

Posts: 6,101
iTrader: (26)

Send a message via Skype™ to doba_s
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
420hp and only 270 ft.torque is pretty pathetic if you ask me. You have to rev the heck out of the engine to even get to that 420hp for a brief second between 7500-8500 rpm.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
Don't compare a 3 series to a Ferrari.....it's not even close. The M3 power is at the bottom of all it's competitor. Yeah yeah sure it's meant to shine on the track not at a straight line. But your average joe don't take it to the track, his race track is the freeway and stop light to stop light. Which put the M3 at a big disadvantage. The M3 dominance over competition ended with the E46.


if you would know a little bit about race cars, you would be thinking how stupid that post is.

He is not comparing Ferrari to M3 ... You are missing the point dude ... The philosophy of the way they are building their engines is the same ... not the cars
doba_s is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 09:36 PM   #10
maaicher
Captain
 
maaicher's Avatar
 
Drives: Jet black E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles

Posts: 733
iTrader: (10)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
420hp and only 270 ft.torque is pretty pathetic if you ask me. You have to rev the heck out of the engine to even get to that 420hp for a brief second between 7500-8500 rpm.
If you owned or had ever driven the m3 you would shut your mouth man. the m3 makes this torque N/A...your 335 makes about the same torque with 2 turbo's?...thats pretty pathetic if you ask me
maaicher is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 10:36 PM   #11
FifthStreetz
O! So Sour!!
 
FifthStreetz's Avatar
 
Drives: Fast e30 / Slow M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Lee, NJ

Posts: 15,525
iTrader: (24)

Garage List
2008 M3  [4.75]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChitownM3 View Post
LOL. Why are you on an M3forum then?
lol dont feed the troll.
__________________
FifthStreetz is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 10:56 PM   #12
Frank@CEC
 
Frank@CEC's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3 AW/BLK
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Coral Gables, FL

Posts: 372
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
Don't compare a 3 series to a Ferrari.....it's not even close. The M3 power is at the bottom of all it's competitor. Yeah yeah sure it's meant to shine on the track not at a straight line. But your average joe don't take it to the track, his race track is the freeway and stop light to stop light. Which put the M3 at a big disadvantage. The M3 dominance over competition ended with the E46.
You have obviously never driven an E92 M3. The engine is very comparable to a 360. I would even say the M3 tranny is better than that of the 360.
Frank@CEC is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 11:00 PM   #13
e46e92love
Brigadier General
 
e46e92love's Avatar
 
Drives: e92 ///M3; X3 (wife's)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The East Side of Things

Posts: 3,039
iTrader: (0)

Send a message via AIM to e46e92love
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
Don't compare a 3 series to a Ferrari.....it's not even close. The M3 power is at the bottom of all it's competitor. Yeah yeah sure it's meant to shine on the track not at a straight line. But your average joe don't take it to the track, his race track is the freeway and stop light to stop light. Which put the M3 at a big disadvantage. The M3 dominance over competition ended with the E46.
Guys like you are the ones destroying it for the rest of us, because for some reason BMW is listening to guys like you and ruining //M with FI. You don't understand anything about these cars, the passion behind them or what a truly balanced sports car should feel like. Seriously, go away.....

Cheers,
e46e92
__________________

"...it's not about the money and not about the brand of the car, it's about handling,performance and passion......And that, no other car has all together like an M3........when you talk about the most complete car the M is invincible." --Tony Kanaan.
e46e92love is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 11:57 PM   #14
JetBlack5OC
Major
 
Drives: E60&E92
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: west

Posts: 1,128
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
The M3 dominance over competition ended with the E46.
Really, is that why it wins every comparo and revered by almost all car analysts as one the best all-around cars.

The E46 M3 didn't over power cars either.

Last edited by JetBlack5OC; 01-21-2009 at 12:34 AM.
JetBlack5OC is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      01-20-2009, 11:58 PM   #15
tim3less
First Lieutenant
 
Drives: '07 STi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NJ

Posts: 363
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
Don't compare a 3 series to a Ferrari.....it's not even close. The M3 power is at the bottom of all it's competitor. Yeah yeah sure it's meant to shine on the track not at a straight line. But your average joe don't take it to the track, his race track is the freeway and stop light to stop light. Which put the M3 at a big disadvantage. The M3 dominance over competition ended with the E46.
damn..i think something is up your ass...
__________________
'10 E92 335xi space gray/coral red
'07 WRX STi
tim3less is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      01-21-2009, 12:01 AM   #16
JetBlack5OC
Major
 
Drives: E60&E92
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: west

Posts: 1,128
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by e46e92love View Post
Guys like you are the ones destroying it for the rest of us, because for some reason BMW is listening to guys like you and ruining //M with FI. You don't understand anything about these cars, the passion behind them or what a truly balanced sports car should feel like. Seriously, go away.....

Cheers,
e46e92
+1
JetBlack5OC is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      01-21-2009, 12:26 AM   #17
KINGLEH
Major
 
KINGLEH's Avatar
 
Drives: 00 GTR - 09 E92 M
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Charleston, SC

Posts: 1,043
iTrader: (1)

my car made 358 at the wheels SAE.... and its pretty much stock.... so im happy with the power....
KINGLEH is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      01-21-2009, 12:49 AM   #18
consolidated
Lieutenant Colonel
 
consolidated's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas

Posts: 1,654
iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbp335 View Post
Don't compare a 3 series to a Ferrari.....it's not even close. The M3 power is at the bottom of all it's competitor. Yeah yeah sure it's meant to shine on the track not at a straight line. But your average joe don't take it to the track, his race track is the freeway and stop light to stop light. Which put the M3 at a big disadvantage. The M3 dominance over competition ended with the E46.
consolidated is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      01-21-2009, 12:57 AM   #19
CeeBoogie
Private
 
Drives: E46 M3
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Long Island NY

Posts: 82
iTrader: (0)

Ummm, the last I checked, the M3 made 295lb ft of tourque not 270lbs
CeeBoogie is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      01-21-2009, 02:24 AM   #20
AlpenWhite25
Private
 
Drives: Alpen White BMW M3
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thessaloniki,Greece

Posts: 59
iTrader: (0)

Thank you for all your comments guys...it was really helpfull...


Quote:
Originally Posted by PencilGeek View Post
There's another possibility that you didn't consider: roller dynos are crap.

The motor dynos that measured 414hp work completely different than roller dynos that most often guess horsepower based on the physics of power=mass*acceleration. The roller dynos are basically guessing horsepower based on how fast the car accelerates. Once you go down this road, you'll find out that different gears have different mechanical efficiencies, your wheels can slip on the rollers, your car can be over or under tentioned on the rollers. Throw it all together, and you end up with garbage-in = garbage out.

The gas you use also makes a huge difference. The differences I measured in my own dyno tests showed a 28hp difference between 91 octane and 100 octane fuel.

Short of taking the motor out of the car and placing it on a motor dyno, the most reliable dyno method is one that attaches directly to the hubs (wheels off of the car) and applies a hydraulic load to lower the motor speed to specified RPM for measurements. This is exactly how a motor dyno works. Two such dynos exist: Rotopower, and Dynapack. All of my tests are done with Dynapack.

Click on the "Dyno runs" link in my signature below to see many dyno results and comparisons between different performance configurations.

PencilGeek i havent put in consideration that possibility....and i really hope that this is true...So based to your experiance,what did Dynapack showed for your Stock M3???

I also think that we should use the same Dyno as a tool to measure upgrades as Mixja recomended...Due to the relative measurment they can provide....
AlpenWhite25 is offline   Greece
0
Reply With Quote
      01-21-2009, 05:37 AM   #21
MrHarris
yodog
 
MrHarris's Avatar
 
Drives: '86 Corolla
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Diamond Bar, Ca

Posts: 5,038
iTrader: (5)

Garage List
2009 BMW  [5.00]
Send a message via AIM to MrHarris
I dyno'd at 333whp stock on a dyno dynamics. I heard they read a bit low but are the most accurate. I wonder what 335's and tuned 335's get on a dyno dynamics?

Also I remember browsing some MB forum and saw a stock C63 dyno on a dyno dynamics and it was at 335whp and 335wtq.
__________________

2009 E92 M3 | Alpine White | Black Extended | Advan RS | Turner Test Pipes | Dinan Axle-Back | OETuning | Eibach Springs | UUC SSK | VRS Front Lip | VRS Type I Diffuser | Matte Black | RPi Scoops | MS Filter | Yokohama AD08 | F1 Pinnacle
Special Thanks: Gintani | OETuning | eAs
MrHarris is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      01-21-2009, 11:10 AM   #22
Mischievous M
First Lieutenant
 
Mischievous M's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW (E92) M3 & 2004 JCW MCS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brunei Darussalam

Posts: 330
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Send a message via MSN to Mischievous M
Quote:
Originally Posted by e46e92love View Post
Guys like you are the ones destroying it for the rest of us, because for some reason BMW is listening to guys like you and ruining //M with FI. You don't understand anything about these cars, the passion behind them or what a truly balanced sports car should feel like. Seriously, go away.....

Cheers,
e46e92


Damn straight man... I couldn't have said it any better.
__________________
Warm Regards,
Mischievous M
No Replacement For Big Displacement!
Mischievous M is offline   Brunei
0
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST