M3 vs GTR in another spec

Archon · 12-08-2008, 03:22 PM

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=137346

Woah! two major price changes in under a year!

No LC next year too, wtf!

The GTR is a faster car but worth 20k+ more? No way.

swamp2 · 12-08-2008, 03:38 PM

Ugh, another price increase.

In the article they say "boost margins". I would call that spinning. I'd be willing to bet it is "cut losses" to be perfectly honest. I posted a quick "back of the envelope" calculation long ago here that showed the GT-R was likely losing money on every car sold at the initial price. These multiple and large price increases are indications I was correct.

E90ice · 12-08-2008, 04:27 PM

I'd take an M3 over that ANY day. Nissan can keep the 20k extra.
Who cares about a few tenths of a second faster?

gthirtyfizle · 12-08-2008, 04:49 PM

I think edmunds tested out the GTR without LC and it did 0-60 in 4.3. Sorry guys but this can no longer b considered a supercar, being that its only about .3 tenths of a sec quicker then the M3 im willing to bet with a few good mods and chip then M3 will keep up easily.

spearfisher · 12-08-2008, 05:17 PM

93 k wow, a bit pricey

Ryan(e92) · 12-08-2008, 07:31 PM

Everyday Nissan comes closer and closer to reality. So that puts the v-spec GTR in the 150k range?

Krueger///M3 · 12-08-2008, 07:42 PM

Wow, no LC, $90k (over $68k initially), what a joke this is turning into.

FStop7 · 12-08-2008, 07:50 PM

$93k.. now we're getting into GT3 territory, and there is no way I would take a GTR over a GT3.

MMMorish · 12-08-2008, 09:23 PM

I still think it's ugly!

michaeldorian · 12-09-2008, 12:56 AM

Wow that is pricey. Makes the 09 ones, which on still on eBay seems like a deal.

bocabill · 12-09-2008, 01:35 AM

Another ugly, overpriced, Japanese piece of junk. The M3 is art in motion.

watrob · 12-09-2008, 01:44 AM

It's still just a Nissan, no heritage there!

swamp2 · 12-09-2008, 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gthirtyfizle

I think edmunds tested out the GTR without LC and it did 0-60 in 4.3. Sorry guys but this can no longer b considered a supercar, being that its only about .3 tenths of a sec quicker then the M3 im willing to bet with a few good mods and chip then M3 will keep up easily.

Pretty sure I have seen better for the GT-R without LC. Either way to 100 or in the 1/4 with or without LC it will tromp the M3. However, the M3 definitely has done better. Its best to 60 has been 4.1 and average is about 4.4. Have a look here at this useful performance "database" for the M3.

Sticky · 12-09-2008, 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FStop7

$93k.. now we're getting into GT3 territory, and there is no way I would take a GTR over a GT3.

GT3 territory? That is barely used 997 GT3 territory.

Sticky · 12-09-2008, 05:54 AM

That price does not really apply, it is a converted number from Japanese currency.

Regardless, the GTR is growing on me. Ugh, I need a supercharger.

footie · 12-09-2008, 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swamp2

Pretty sure I have seen better for the GT-R without LC. Either way to 100 or in the 1/4 with or without LC it will tromp the M3. However, the M3 definitely has done better. Its best to 60 has been 4.1 and average is about 4.4. Have a look here at this useful performance "database" for the M3.

I thought the only 4.1s times for the M3 were with roll out. The 4.3s time for the GTR was without LC and roll out.

ismelllikepoop · 12-09-2008, 09:21 AM

man these posts on here are why so many ppl rag on bmw owners, sound like insecure cocks

josephr25 · 12-09-2008, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ismelllikepoop

man these posts on here are why so many ppl rag on bmw owners, sound like insecure cocks

It lets them feel good about themselves owning a BMW; more so because of a nice little "M" badge.

Let's see these people engineer a better car than Nissan, rather than buy one that is subjectively better; which any idiot can do

The GTR may be ugly but it's faster than a lot of cars out there even without LC. Which was kinda its point to begin with. I would rather have an M3 but even then I would be b*tching about a lot of things about my car.

spearfisher · 12-09-2008, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watrob

It's still just a Nissan, no heritage there!

it does have a heratige, just not as prestigeous as the M brand, but a huge cult following none the less and always better performance numbers.
always electronics ahead of it's time.

just never a fan of the styling, but no one can debate the performance.

lucid · 12-09-2008, 11:54 AM

Sounds like the folks who bought the initial GTR batches at MSRP made a good investment...

michaeldorian · 12-09-2008, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucid

Sounds like the folks who bought the initial GTR batches at MSRP made a good investment...

Definately. Still quite a few 09's available on eBay and at dealers for near current MSRP. Anyone's who looking, might be a good time.

th3Stig · 12-11-2008, 10:19 PM

lucid, especially if you aren't ever going to launch it.

12-08-2008, 03:22 PM	#1
Archon Private First Class Drives: E92 M3 DCT AW/BLK Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: SF Bay Area Posts: 152 iTrader: (0)	M3 vs GTR in another spec http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=137346 Woah! two major price changes in under a year! No LC next year too, wtf! The GTR is a faster car but worth 20k+ more? No way.
	Tweet

12-08-2008, 04:27 PM	#3
E90ice Banned Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe Join Date: May 2006 Location: WA Posts: 2,006 iTrader: (0)	I'd take an M3 over that ANY day. Nissan can keep the 20k extra. Who cares about a few tenths of a second faster? __________________

12-08-2008, 09:23 PM	#9
MMMorish Just call me J.J. McClure Drives: E92 M3 & C4 Corvette Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Toronto Posts: 2,838 iTrader: (5)	I still think it's ugly! __________________ MODS: Meisterschaft GT Racing Exhaust / BMC Air Filter / UUC SSK & DSSR (Modded)/ RPI Scoops / Passport SRX Hardwired / Custom Wrap 3M Clearbra / 20% Tint / 50% Windshield Tint / Key Hole Delete / Matted Out Accessories / VRS Type II Diffuser / Smoked Reflectors / Euphoria 6K LED Interior Lights / Rear Fog Light Mod / 6000K HID's / 6500K LUX H8 Angel Eyes / RDash License Plate LED Kit / LED Xenon Reverse Lights "M3 drivers have no friends"

12-09-2008, 01:35 AM	#11
bocabill New Member Drives: 2008 BMW M3 Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Boca Raton, FL Posts: 6 iTrader: (0)	Another ugly, overpriced, Japanese piece of junk. The M3 is art in motion. __________________ 2008 BMW M3 E92 M-DCT Jet Black

12-09-2008, 01:44 AM	#12
watrob Major Drives: MY2013 X5M 50d - White Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Brisbane - Australia Posts: 1,490 iTrader: (0)	It's still just a Nissan, no heritage there! __________________ X5 M50d White, 20"rims, Adaptive Drive, HUD, Xenon Adapt Lights, Rear/Side Camera, Sunroof, Auto Tailgate, Comfort Access, Active Perforated Ventilated Comfort Seats, M Paddle Shift, Active Crus, Stop/Go, Proff Nav + TV, DAB, 16 Spk Ind HiFi, USB, Internet, Apps, 4 Zone Air, Towbar 20% Tint, 5mm Castor Bushes, Yellow Calipers, Ceramic Pads

12-08-2008, 03:38 PM	#2
swamp2 Major General Drives: E92 M3 Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: San Diego, CA USA Posts: 8,317 iTrader: (1)	Ugh, another price increase. In the article they say "boost margins". I would call that spinning. I'd be willing to bet it is "cut losses" to be perfectly honest. I posted a quick "back of the envelope" calculation long ago here that showed the GT-R was likely losing money on every car sold at the initial price. These multiple and large price increases are indications I was correct.

12-08-2008, 04:49 PM	#4
gthirtyfizle Colonel Drives: E92 M3 AW Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NYC Posts: 2,588 iTrader: (4)	I think edmunds tested out the GTR without LC and it did 0-60 in 4.3. Sorry guys but this can no longer b considered a supercar, being that its only about .3 tenths of a sec quicker then the M3 im willing to bet with a few good mods and chip then M3 will keep up easily.

12-08-2008, 05:17 PM	#5
spearfisher Lieutenant Drives: C6 ZO6 Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: FL Posts: 409 iTrader: (0)	93 k wow, a bit pricey

12-08-2008, 07:31 PM	#6
Ryan(e92) Captain Drives: Interlagos Blue ZCP Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Newport Beach Posts: 702 iTrader: (6)	Everyday Nissan comes closer and closer to reality. So that puts the v-spec GTR in the 150k range?

12-08-2008, 07:42 PM	#7
Krueger///M3 Major Drives: 2003 HPF 2.5, 2008 M3 (Sold) Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Pearl District, OR Posts: 1,403 iTrader: (0) Garage List 2002 BMW ///M3 [0.00] 2008 BMW ///M3 [0.00]	Wow, no LC, $90k (over $68k initially), what a joke this is turning into.

12-08-2008, 07:50 PM	#8
FStop7 I like cars Drives: M6 Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Newbury Park, CA Posts: 5,061 iTrader: (3)	$93k.. now we're getting into GT3 territory, and there is no way I would take a GTR over a GT3.

12-09-2008, 12:56 AM	#10
michaeldorian Captain Drives: Beater Nissan Truck Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 954 iTrader: (0)	Wow that is pricey. Makes the 09 ones, which on still on eBay seems like a deal.

12-09-2008, 05:54 AM	#15
Sticky Banned Drives: E92 Jerez DCT M3 Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Anaheim Hills / Malibu Posts: 2,244 iTrader: (0)	That price does not really apply, it is a converted number from Japanese currency. Regardless, the GTR is growing on me. Ugh, I need a supercharger.

12-09-2008, 09:21 AM	#17
ismelllikepoop First Lieutenant Drives: m3 Join Date: May 2008 Location: pooptown Posts: 323 iTrader: (1)	man these posts on here are why so many ppl rag on bmw owners, sound like insecure cocks

12-09-2008, 11:54 AM	#20
lucid Major General Drives: E30 M3; Expedition Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: USA Posts: 8,037 iTrader: (0)	Sounds like the folks who bought the initial GTR batches at MSRP made a good investment... __________________

12-11-2008, 10:19 PM	#22
th3Stig Private Drives: 2010 GT500 Eleanor Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: SWFL Posts: 50 iTrader: (0)	lucid, especially if you aren't ever going to launch it.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search