FORUMS
- 5
![]() |
|
![]() |
| 12-11-2008, 02:54 PM | #45 |
|
Brigadier General
![]() |
|
|
|
|
| 12-11-2008, 03:16 PM | #46 |
|
I like cars
|
Has anyone actually put a 135i on a scale?
The E92 M3 weighs between 3450 - 3500lbs dry depending on if it has DCT. What is the actual weight, not the advertised weight, of the 135i? |
![]() |
|
| 12-11-2008, 03:18 PM | #47 |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
| 12-11-2008, 05:53 PM | #48 | |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I completely agree. Also wishing I was 23 again. ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
| 12-12-2008, 02:31 AM | #50 | |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
You're right the 135i is lighter than the M3, but the M3 has more power. It's not really about weight, it's not really about power, it's about the ratio of the two.
__________________
**MODS** JL-CF Lip | JL-CF Diffuser | BMW Performance Exhaust | RPI Scoop | MS Filter | BMW Performance Spoiler | ZCP Illuminated Shift Knob | Lux H8 |
|
![]() |
|
| 12-12-2008, 10:38 AM | #51 | |
|
Brigadier General
![]() |
Quote:
But as I said, it's not important to me - my 335i is stock at the moment. Weight is the enemy of any performance car - it makes the suspension, tires and brakes work that much harder. Even with the stock 335i on track I didn't wish for more power, but I surely wished for a few hundred lbs less weight. The 1 answers this criticism to some extent - and you can certainly feel it in the way it changes direction (in any weight transfer situation in fact). I also like it's smaller, tidier dimensions which make it different to drive in traffic - more like threading a needle rather than scaring others away. ![]() Could it be lighter? Of course. What car couldn't? Still, it's an improvement over any 3-derived car. I may also be in a minority on this forum who actually thinks the interior is much better than the 3 series/M3 - much more in the traditional BMW style, and without any loss in quality. (No need to flame, just an opinion). As I said, the M3 has certain advantages over the 1 - the fully sorted suspension, perfectly matched to the power and pace, the charismatic engine, the amazing traction offered by the M diff, in other words, the complete package. But - you pay for it - in more ways that one. |
|
|
|
|
| 12-15-2008, 09:47 PM | #53 |
|
Colonel
![]() |
No. It looks much better in person than in pictures. Dropped on aftermarket wheels, it looks awesome.
__________________
'09 Interlagos Blue E92 M3 (sold to a good home)
|
![]() |
|
| 01-09-2009, 02:48 PM | #55 |
|
HALA MADRID!
|
it is ugly compared to the e92 M3, but in person it looks quite nice, and one of the reasons I got it. Back in April of 2008 I test drove the 335i/135i back to back, and it was a no brainer: the 135i was the faster, more nimble, more dynamic car.
$2500 in mods later (KW V2 coils, JB3 chip map6, and some aesthetics like CF spoiler, etc), and I could not be happier. Does well in the track, can surpass an M3 straightline when needed, and it is cheaper. There is no replacing an M3...at the end of the day, there is somethign about the M that is just special, but for $40k, a car that has 85-90% of the performance of the M3 at 60% of the cost, in this economy, was the smart choice for me. When the next Gen M comes in with Forced Induction, then i'll be all over it, but for now, I will be enjoying this little guy: ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() __________________________________________________ ____________ e90 M3, Interlagos Blue / M individual two-tone, ZCP, ZP2, ZCV, DCT, ED. |
![]() |
|
| 01-09-2009, 06:11 PM | #56 |
|
Major
![]() |
nice lookin ride...
my 335 was awesome and my M3 is even more awesome.
__________________
08 - M3 Sparkling Graphite/blk leather/tech/6 speed
08 - 335i Sport/Prem/Auto White/Terra - AA Exhaust 07 Acura MDX Tech, 07 G35S /Nav ![]() |
![]() |
|
| 01-09-2009, 06:38 PM | #57 | |
|
Colonel
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
'09 Interlagos Blue E92 M3 (sold to a good home)
|
|
![]() |
|
| 01-09-2009, 11:12 PM | #58 | |
|
Second Lieutenant
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| 01-09-2009, 11:50 PM | #59 | |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I wish they looked better to me, it's a great driving car that would have made me think twice about the M. Not that the M will win first prize at the pig fair either... |
|
|
|
|
| 01-10-2009, 01:58 AM | #60 |
|
n1smo
|
1 series owners: You don't need to justify your purchase to M3 owners because to this owner, it is just a much uglier version of the 3 series with a cheaper and smaller interior. You're not even looking at 100 lbs difference between the 135 and 335 according to the BMW website so the performance difference felt is strictly imagined. I drove a 135 and it felt no different than the 335. Enjoy your car (by driving it), don't waste your time justifying it (at least confine it to 1addict) because it comes across as regret/ jealousy when you do it here. This is not directed at anyone particular but if the shoe fits...
__________________
|
![]() |
|
| 01-12-2009, 12:08 PM | #62 | ||||
|
Brigadier General
![]() |
Quote:
As for uglier, I personally agree with you 100%. But who cares, in a post discussing performance? Quote:
Quote:
These differences exist, and they make the 135i a different car to drive than the 335i. Now these differences may not be sufficient for you, and you may crave the other differences an M3 brings, but you simply cannot claim they don't exist. Quote:
My 335i is due for replacement in a few months and the M3 becons mightily - but it would be a little financial stretch for me, so I cannot help but wonder where the 135i would sit, given a thoughtful list of modifications. So I welcome posts such as these whole-heartedly and without any preconceived notions, rancor or snobbery. |
||||
|
|
|
| 01-12-2009, 12:47 PM | #63 | ||||
|
n1smo
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
http://www.bmw.com/com/en/newvehicle...ml?currPage=27 Different sources, different numbers. Mine are off the corporate site which makes more sense since the 135 nothing more than a shorter 3 series. Where do you shave 198 lbs off the 335? The cheaper interior might save a few pounds, but not 198 lbs. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||||
![]() |
|
| 01-12-2009, 01:20 PM | #64 |
|
Enlisted Member
![]() Drives: E92 335i Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London, UK
|
QUOTE 'The 135 truly reflects BMW's return to its roots--small, simplistic, and fast cars.'
+1 |
|
|
|
| 01-12-2009, 01:38 PM | #65 |
|
JOSH SHOKRI.
Drives: 2013 E92 Coupe. Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: los angeles, california.
|
i want a 135 for my daily.
![]()
__________________
![]() Speed District >> Past: 08 6MT E92 Matte Blue Gintani Supercharged - Present: 13 DCT E92 *California Members* Speed District M3 Track Days: May 31, 2012 @ Willow Springs Raceway (Road Course) |
![]() |
|
| 01-12-2009, 02:31 PM | #66 | ||||
|
Brigadier General
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
The cheaper interior probably doesn't save any pounds - after all, why would hard plastic weigh less than soft plastic? Quote:
Hey perhaps the 135i responded in kind to your lack of love... ![]() Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|