BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > General M3 Forum (E90 + E92 + E93)
 
European Auto Source
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-09-2008, 03:12 AM   #1
dakulov
New Member
1
Rep
9
Posts

 
Drives: BMW M3 E92 AW
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Moscow, Russia

iTrader: (0)

Weight difference with different options?

I ve been wondering how much weight do the most popular options add:
- M-DCT
- Navi (I-drive stuuf)
- Premium audio, parktronics, etc.
What the power to weight ratio will be with the equiped car then?
Thanks.
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 04:31 AM   #2
Wads
Second Lieutenant
Wads's Avatar
4
Rep
257
Posts

 
Drives: E93 M3 & Tuned Focus ST
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
M-DCT adds about 45kg.

Nav (purely a guess!) could be 5kg???

Audio maybe another 5kg????

Difference in power to weight 250bhp/ton for a base Coupe Vs 242bhp/ton for a car with the M-DCT etc...... however the M-DCT car will still be quicker due to its better gearing and super quick shifts.
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 07:07 AM   #3
rai
Captain
rai's Avatar
United_States
13
Rep
649
Posts

 
Drives: M3 coupe with DCT
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maryland

iTrader: (0)

I heard 45 lbs for DCT not 45 KG for DCT.
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 08:17 AM   #4
gorun
Lieutenant
gorun's Avatar
10
Rep
516
Posts

 
Drives: W166 ML63 PP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Where the roads are crap...

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rai View Post
I heard 45 lbs for DCT not 45 KG for DCT.
you heard correct
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 08:23 AM   #5
Wads
Second Lieutenant
Wads's Avatar
4
Rep
257
Posts

 
Drives: E93 M3 & Tuned Focus ST
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by gorun View Post
you heard correct
I stand corrected sorry its only 20kg for DCT not 45!!!
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 09:39 AM   #6
KonigsTiger
Racying Dynamics
KonigsTiger's Avatar
66
Rep
4,398
Posts

 
Drives: E92M3 RS46 Club Sport, others
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dweller

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wads View Post
I stand corrected sorry its only 20kg for DCT not 45!!!
Wow, that is nothing!! And NAV would have te be less than 5 kg as well IMO.
__________________
==================================================
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 11:52 AM   #7
JEllis
Brigadier General
JEllis's Avatar
84
Rep
4,783
Posts

 
Drives: E36 M3, E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SD CA/Yuma

iTrader: (4)

Honestly the only real option that will add any perceptible difference in weight are the 18's vs 19's. The 18's save about 4-6lbs per corner in unsprung weight. That is getting close to 100lbs. If you think about it thats like riding with a trim/short girl in the passenger seat.

Jason
__________________
http://www.m3post.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic14547_7.gif
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 12:23 PM   #8
rai
Captain
rai's Avatar
United_States
13
Rep
649
Posts

 
Drives: M3 coupe with DCT
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maryland

iTrader: (0)

the sunroof does add some weight. I dislike sunroofs not just for the weight but the CF < steel < sunroof and the weight is at the top of the car which is almost the worst place to have it.

I think the steel roof is about 10 lbs more than the CF roof and the sunroof adds another 10 lbs. So in other words a sunroof on a coupe is probably 20 lbs more than the CF standard roof.

I forget the exact weight but I think it's like 20 lbs.

Likely the premium stereo weighs a fair amount with speakers and extra amps those things are not nothing.

Last edited by rai; 04-09-2008 at 12:39 PM.
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 12:28 PM   #9
gadget
Major
gadget's Avatar
United_States
31
Rep
1,162
Posts

 
Drives: 09 e92///M SSII DCT
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: US

iTrader: (0)

Unless you are going to be doing extensive timed runs on a track, you won't notice a difference in real life.

As far as being faster than a heavier M3 not only depends on the weight of the car, but the amount of fuel, driver skills etc. In my opinion, you should get the option you want unless you are going to build a track car and plan on gutting it out.
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 01:39 PM   #10
rai
Captain
rai's Avatar
United_States
13
Rep
649
Posts

 
Drives: M3 coupe with DCT
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maryland

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gadget View Post
Unless you are going to be doing extensive timed runs on a track, you won't notice a difference in real life.

As far as being faster than a heavier M3 not only depends on the weight of the car, but the amount of fuel, driver skills etc. In my opinion, you should get the option you want unless you are going to build a track car and plan on gutting it out.
I tend to agree, all the options don't look to be more than 100 lbs one way or the other.

Except the Vert option which is 400 lbs (I think) I have not driven but likely that's very heavy feeling compared to the least M3.
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 01:51 PM   #11
ersin
Brigadier General
ersin's Avatar
United_States
42
Rep
4,068
Posts

 
Drives: 08 IB E92 M3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEllis View Post
Honestly the only real option that will add any perceptible difference in weight are the 18's vs 19's. The 18's save about 4-6lbs per corner in unsprung weight. That is getting close to 100lbs. If you think about it thats like riding with a trim/short girl in the passenger seat.

Jason
I'll take the girl, thank you.
__________________

I've been assimilated. 6MT/ZPP/18"/PS extended.
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 08:47 PM   #12
Ronin13
First Lieutenant
Ronin13's Avatar
United_States
8
Rep
362
Posts

 
Drives: DKG E92 M3, S2K, JGC
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: STL, MO

iTrader: (0)

Actually, GregW weighed the stock 19s with tires and is estimating 23 lbs front and 26.5 lbs rear (give or take a pound after subtracting tire weight). We won't know for sure until someone weighs the stock 18s, but the 19s may actually be the stock lightweight option for this car.
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 09:32 PM   #13
RandyB
Lieutenant Colonel
RandyB's Avatar
United_States
15
Rep
1,504
Posts

 
Drives: '03 330i, '09 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
Actually, GregW weighed the stock 19s with tires and is estimating 23 lbs front and 26.5 lbs rear (give or take a pound after subtracting tire weight). We won't know for sure until someone weighs the stock 18s, but the 19s may actually be the stock lightweight option for this car.
That sounds encouraging. Still, the 18s have their main mass (the wheel) .5" closer to the center so even if they weigh the same there might be a slight advantage. At any rate, I bet the difference in weight between the two sizes is less than most believe at this point. I'm getting the 19s, BTW. I looked for tire weights (18s vs 19s) and couldn't find anything.
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 09:45 PM   #14
skierman64
Brigadier General
skierman64's Avatar
United_States
43
Rep
3,068
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 E92 Space Gray M3 & E36M3
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greater St Louis Metro area

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
1998 M3 Coupe  [0.00]
2008 M3 Coupe  [0.00]
Send a message via Yahoo to skierman64
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyB View Post
That sounds encouraging. Still, the 18s have their main mass (the wheel) .5" closer to the center so even if they weigh the same there might be a slight advantage. At any rate, I bet the difference in weight between the two sizes is less than most believe at this point. I'm getting the 19s, BTW. I looked for tire weights (18s vs 19s) and couldn't find anything.
www.tirerack.com
__________________
Get a professional motorsports full featured stopwatch app for your Blackberry here: http://appworld.blackberry.com/webstore/content/19464
Invest Wisely...The best mod for your money?? BMWCCA high performance driver's school. The mod that lasts a lifetime and improves the performance of any car you drive
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2008, 10:27 PM   #15
RandyB
Lieutenant Colonel
RandyB's Avatar
United_States
15
Rep
1,504
Posts

 
Drives: '03 330i, '09 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

Thanks. According to the weights listed on The Tire Rack, the 19" rears are 1-2 lbs lighter than the 18" and the fronts are 0-1 lb lighter than the 18s. They have several listed of each size so I'm not sure which weight to use, thus the range. I bet the combined tire/wheel weight between the 18s and 19s will be nearly negligible.
Appreciate 0
      04-10-2008, 01:18 AM   #16
sayemthree
Brigadier General
sayemthree's Avatar
127
Rep
4,845
Posts

 
Drives: bmw
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: usa

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEllis View Post
Honestly the only real option that will add any perceptible difference in weight are the 18's vs 19's. The 18's save about 4-6lbs per corner in unsprung weight. That is getting close to 100lbs. If you think about it thats like riding with a trim/short girl in the passenger seat.

Jason

this is unfounded. the 19's wiegh less than we thought thanks to greg for wieghing them.

moonroof 56#
DCT 45 #
other misc. options 5#

total 106 #.

Last edited by sayemthree; 04-11-2008 at 02:25 AM.
Appreciate 0
      04-10-2008, 11:33 PM   #17
e36jakeo
Captain
United_States
12
Rep
624
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 M3 6 Speed MT!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern CA

iTrader: (0)

I read that the Steel roof weighs 12 lbs more than the CF roof, and getting the sunroof in the Coupe rather than CF adds 42 lbs. So in other words, getting the sunroof in the sedan should add about 30 lbs over just a plain steel roof.

To me this is real weight that is in the wrong location. Then factor in $1050 savings and I will be leaving the sunroof out.
__________________
Driving sideways: It's not faster, but damn it's more fun!
Appreciate 0
      04-11-2008, 02:26 AM   #18
sayemthree
Brigadier General
sayemthree's Avatar
127
Rep
4,845
Posts

 
Drives: bmw
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: usa

iTrader: (0)

carbon fiber roof FTW!!!!!!!!!
Appreciate 0
      04-11-2008, 03:02 AM   #19
oneginee
Banned
6
Rep
416
Posts

 
Drives: GT3 RS
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SE

iTrader: (0)

just weighting the tires on a scale will not give you the true answer.
Moment of inertia needs to be calculated for the wheel + tire.

When accelerating the available torque at the wheels will be fighting a greater resistance to angular rotation acceleration if the moment of inertia is higher and that will result in less traction on the road for acceleration.

The moment of inertia is proportional to the distance of the mass to the centre of rotation squared. So 18 to 19 inch can still make a 11% increase even if the tires weight the same.

Appreciate 0
      04-11-2008, 06:07 AM   #20
RandyB
Lieutenant Colonel
RandyB's Avatar
United_States
15
Rep
1,504
Posts

 
Drives: '03 330i, '09 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by oneginee View Post

The moment of inertia is proportional to the distance of the mass to the centre of rotation squared. So 18 to 19 inch can still make a 11% increase even if the tires weight the same.

That is correct and I touched on it in my post. I still bet it is going to be close between the two stock sizes because the 19" tires look to be a pound or two lighter than the 18s. Maybe that will help offset some of what the rim difference is because the tires are even further from the center.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST