BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > General M3 Forum (E90 + E92 + E93)
 
ESS Tuning
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-07-2008, 01:24 PM   #1
gasman
Member
 
gasman's Avatar
 
Drives: 08 RR Sport SC, 08 AW/FR M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX

Posts: 505
iTrader: (0)

GGT $1300 for MDCT

My CA sent pics of my car at the dealership and the window sticker confirms the $1300 gas guzzler tax. A reduction would have been nice but it's definitely not a deal breaker.
__________________
gasman is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 01:28 PM   #2
swamp2
Lieutenant General
 
swamp2's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Posts: 10,200
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gasman View Post
My CA sent pics of my car at the dealership and the window sticker confirms the $1300 gas guzzler tax. A reduction would have been nice but it's definitely not a deal breaker.
Bummer, so much for BMW marketing again and their calls of efficiency...
swamp2 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 01:40 PM   #3
rai
Captain
 
rai's Avatar
 
Drives: M3 coupe with DCT
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maryland

Posts: 647
iTrader: (0)

yea, I thought marketing said the dct saved fuel. what a scam.

I guess it's a lesson not to believe anything from marketing, likely the 335i is a better all around car as well but the ///M stands for Money.
rai is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 01:45 PM   #4
KonigsTiger
Racying Dynamics
 
KonigsTiger's Avatar
 
Drives: E92M3 RS46 Club Sport, others
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dweller

Posts: 4,398
iTrader: (0)

Figures!!!!!
__________________
==================================================
KonigsTiger is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 01:53 PM   #5
batchelorc
Lieutenant
 
batchelorc's Avatar
 
Drives: Deez nuts
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas City

Posts: 559
iTrader: (0)

Is it possible BMW didn't put the MDCT up for an eval and are just sticking with current MPG ratings?
batchelorc is online now   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 01:53 PM   #6
RandyB
Lieutenant Colonel
 
RandyB's Avatar
 
Drives: '03 330i, '09 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Texas

Posts: 1,504
iTrader: (0)

Here's the worst part - It's not faster either!
RandyB is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 01:55 PM   #7
KonigsTiger
Racying Dynamics
 
KonigsTiger's Avatar
 
Drives: E92M3 RS46 Club Sport, others
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dweller

Posts: 4,398
iTrader: (0)

Hahahahaha!!!!!
__________________
==================================================
KonigsTiger is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 01:55 PM   #8
SpencerM3
Sauce
 
SpencerM3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 SSII E90 M3
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Los Angeles

Posts: 2,026
iTrader: (1)

Doesn't surprise me. There was a GGT on the E46 SMG yes?

I had it on my tip S4.
__________________
2009 E90 M3 | Silverstone II | Black Novillo | HRE P40's | Akrapovic Exhaust | Eibach Pro Kit | Jet Black Kidney Grilles | SSII Side Reflectors | SSII Side Gills | LUX H8 Angel Eyes | Macht Schnell Filter | Tecnocraft Envy Charge Pipe

"M3 drivers have no friends." - Jeremy Clarkson
SpencerM3 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 03:00 PM   #9
Keto
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Keto's Avatar
 
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WHO DAT NATION

Posts: 1,539
iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2015 BMW M3  [5.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyB View Post
Here's the worst part - It's not faster either!
And it's got a third pedal!
__________________
2015 SO/SO MT M3 Exec : Lighting : Adaptive : HK : CF trim : Full leather : DAP : Black 19's : sunshade
Crystalline tint 40%/70% on windshield : Gloss black grilles/side markers/exhaust tips : Painted front reflectors
V1 Savvy hardwired : Self-coded, will code locally for beer or food
Keto is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 03:42 PM   #10
WCH
Major
 
WCH's Avatar
 
Drives: '11 E92 M3 SSII; '14 F10 M5 SG
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston

Posts: 1,137
iTrader: (3)

Garage List
2014 F10 M5  [0.00]
2014 Cayenne GTS  [0.00]
2011 E92 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Bummer, so much for BMW marketing again and their calls of efficiency...
+1. Not a deal breaker but too bad.
__________________
WCH is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 04:00 PM   #11
swamp2
Lieutenant General
 
swamp2's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Posts: 10,200
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpencerM3 View Post
Doesn't surprise me. There was a GGT on the E46 SMG yes?

I had it on my tip S4.
There was no marketing nor technical reasons SMG should have offered better mpg. However, with M-DCT there is marketing, EU specs on mpg and information about the tranny specifically that purport better mpg.
swamp2 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 04:12 PM   #12
drvai
Major
 
drvai's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3 AW
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FL

Posts: 1,260
iTrader: (0)

Well, they first said the new M3 was 8% more economical....

Theoretical number not always match real life.
drvai is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 04:48 PM   #13
MDCTFTW
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Drives: E92 DCT
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norcal

Posts: 1,974
iTrader: (0)

That's too bad. It would make DCT 50% off.
MDCTFTW is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 04:51 PM   #14
skierman64
Brigadier General
 
skierman64's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 E92 Space Gray M3 & E36M3
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greater St Louis Metro area

Posts: 3,068
iTrader: (1)

Garage List
1998 M3 Coupe  [0.00]
2008 M3 Coupe  [0.00]
Send a message via Yahoo to skierman64
Quote:
Originally Posted by batchelorc View Post
Is it possible BMW didn't put the MDCT up for an eval and are just sticking with current MPG ratings?
I think that's probably the case. I was concerned that might happen.

I'll ask that question when I see the M brand manager on Thursday night.
__________________
Get a professional motorsports full featured stopwatch app for your Blackberry here: http://appworld.blackberry.com/webstore/content/19464
Invest Wisely...The best mod for your money?? BMWCCA high performance driver's school. The mod that lasts a lifetime and improves the performance of any car you drive
skierman64 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 04:52 PM   #15
KonigsTiger
Racying Dynamics
 
KonigsTiger's Avatar
 
Drives: E92M3 RS46 Club Sport, others
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dweller

Posts: 4,398
iTrader: (0)

For a 70 thousand dollar car, I canīt imagine why the big fuzz about maybe, just maybe, saving $10 a gas tank!!!!! I would think people care more about the general performance of the car than a small percentage difference it may yield in gas savings.
__________________
==================================================
KonigsTiger is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 05:23 PM   #16
gasman
Member
 
gasman's Avatar
 
Drives: 08 RR Sport SC, 08 AW/FR M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX

Posts: 505
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by batchelorc View Post
Is it possible BMW didn't put the MDCT up for an eval and are just sticking with current MPG ratings?
The window sticker showed 14 and 20. Is that the same as the manual tranny?
__________________
gasman is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 05:47 PM   #17
rvacha
Captain
 
rvacha's Avatar
 
Drives: '08 E92 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cleveland, OH

Posts: 745
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 E92 M3  [0.00]
I don't think this has anything to do with efficiency, it has to do with the fact that the EPA always assumes that if you have a manual mode, you will drive it "wrong" (i.e. wrong gear, inefficiently). My 97 E39 540i 6MT for example got 2MPG better than the slushbox, but the 6MT had GGT, the slushbox didn't
__________________

'03 X5 4.4i Blue/Tan
'06 E90 330Xi 6MT Sparkling Graphite/Terra
'08 E92 M3 6MT Jerez/Speed Cloth <-- Evil Twin
rvacha is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 05:59 PM   #18
SpencerM3
Sauce
 
SpencerM3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 SSII E90 M3
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Los Angeles

Posts: 2,026
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
There was no marketing nor technical reasons SMG should have offered better mpg. However, with M-DCT there is marketing, EU specs on mpg and information about the tranny specifically that purport better mpg.
Thanks
__________________
2009 E90 M3 | Silverstone II | Black Novillo | HRE P40's | Akrapovic Exhaust | Eibach Pro Kit | Jet Black Kidney Grilles | SSII Side Reflectors | SSII Side Gills | LUX H8 Angel Eyes | Macht Schnell Filter | Tecnocraft Envy Charge Pipe

"M3 drivers have no friends." - Jeremy Clarkson
SpencerM3 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 06:02 PM   #19
swamp2
Lieutenant General
 
swamp2's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Posts: 10,200
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMW-M-Mexico View Post
For a 70 thousand dollar car, I canīt imagine why the big fuzz about maybe, just maybe, saving $10 a gas tank!!!!! I would think people care more about the general performance of the car than a small percentage difference it may yield in gas savings.
Ther is nothing wrong with wanting:

-less taxes
-spend less on gas
-as much of an environmentally sound car as possible
-true delivery of BMWs "Efficient Dynamics" blending performance with efficiency
-great engineering which CAN lead to Efficient Dynamics

These are not inconsistent with wanting a high performance car.
swamp2 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 06:11 PM   #20
KonigsTiger
Racying Dynamics
 
KonigsTiger's Avatar
 
Drives: E92M3 RS46 Club Sport, others
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dweller

Posts: 4,398
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Ther is nothing wrong with wanting:

-less taxes
-spend less on gas
-as much of an environmentally sound car as possible
-true delivery of BMWs "Efficient Dynamics" blending performance with efficiency
-great engineering which CAN lead to Efficient Dynamics

These are not inconsistent with wanting a high performance car.
No they are not at all inconsistent, and if its the environment you worry about (as I do), then more power to you!!! I work in a firm that produces Hydrogen, BioDiesel and Ethonal (Not from Suger or Corn either). So I can really relate to all this. However, it seems to me that the fuzz is not about the environment but about not paying a gas guslter tax etc!!!
__________________
==================================================
KonigsTiger is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 06:40 PM   #21
skierman64
Brigadier General
 
skierman64's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 E92 Space Gray M3 & E36M3
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greater St Louis Metro area

Posts: 3,068
iTrader: (1)

Garage List
1998 M3 Coupe  [0.00]
2008 M3 Coupe  [0.00]
Send a message via Yahoo to skierman64
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMW-M-Mexico View Post
For a 70 thousand dollar car, I canīt imagine why the big fuzz about maybe, just maybe, saving $10 a gas tank!!!!! I would think people care more about the general performance of the car than a small percentage difference it may yield in gas savings.
For me at least, it wasn't about the gas savings as it was about the Gas Guzzler Tax. I'd just prefer not to send any more money to the Gov't than I have to. I'd rather have that $1300 to spend on other things for my M3.
__________________
Get a professional motorsports full featured stopwatch app for your Blackberry here: http://appworld.blackberry.com/webstore/content/19464
Invest Wisely...The best mod for your money?? BMWCCA high performance driver's school. The mod that lasts a lifetime and improves the performance of any car you drive
skierman64 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2008, 06:45 PM   #22
rai
Captain
 
rai's Avatar
 
Drives: M3 coupe with DCT
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maryland

Posts: 647
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMW-M-Mexico View Post
However, it seems to me that the fuzz is not about the environment but about not paying a gas guslter tax etc!!!


who wants to pay extra tax? I mean if you don't care about $$ why don't you just burn it or give it to a charity. Likely many people here pay a lot of taxes already and if they can save $$ what's the harm, also the DCT costs $2700 so it's not saving any money that way so why can't they hope for less tax? When BMW marketing said 'significant gas savings' or something like that some people were led to believe there could be some truth to it but not likely.

Also, since you're not in the US what's the fizz (whatever that means) why do you care or have anything to say about our GG tax since you're not paying it anyway.
rai is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST