Car and Driver's GTR test: 0-60 3.3 and 11.5 1/4 mile

gbb357 · 03-24-2008, 10:42 AM

And still gets 21 MPG highway!

from NAGTROC:

Keto · 03-24-2008, 04:45 PM

ZOMG, that interior is godawful, but what a fantastic car. If only I had the cash to make it the weekend ride...

spearfisher · 03-24-2008, 05:25 PM

that is really one hell of a performer, I guess I could learn to love the front,

I can just imagine what that will do with a electronic boost controller, intake and exhaust.

BCMPOWER · 03-24-2008, 05:33 PM

Performance car bargan of the decade! .99G's and four seat GT Nissan has come to the gunfight with Nukes!

RandyB · 03-24-2008, 07:23 PM

C&D observed mpg: 16

Good numbers. Not a pretty face though.

Robert · 04-05-2008, 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyB

C&D observed mpg: 16

Good numbers. Not a pretty face though.

It's so fast you would never catch a glimpse of its face. By the time the sound wave hits your eardrums the car is already 10 car length ahead ;-)

bruce.augenstein@comcast. · 04-05-2008, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyB

C&D observed mpg: 16

Good numbers. Not a pretty face though.

Just got to check one out at the New York auto show last week. Pretty impressive in the flesh. I wouldn't call it beautiful, but those points that made me shake my head a bit when looking at the pictures seem to work pretty well when viewed in person. Specifically the roofline and front end actually look worlds better than in the pictures. I think this is specifically because the photographers often take these shots from down near the ground for dramatic effect.

If one normally looks at vehicles when supine, then the GT-R has real faults. Standing up, however, it gets a thumbs up from me. It's pretty much in-your-face styling, but it works.

And talk about a halo car! The Nissan exhibit was absolutely more crowded than any other manufacturer, by quite a good margin. Of course, people were leaving shoe prints all over the Sentras in an effort to get to the GT-R, but hey, traffic is traffic.

Bruce

RandyB · 04-05-2008, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbo

It's so fast you would never catch a glimpse of its face. By the time the sound wave hits your eardrums the car is already 10 car length ahead ;-)

Good. I won't have to look at it for long.

The styling is unique, and a little over the top for me but it looks a lot better now than when I first saw the spy shots. It's kind of interesting, at least. The numbers are incredible for the weight of the thing.

M3NTAL · 04-05-2008, 04:50 PM

I find it interesting that C&D's measured performance figures for cars always seem to be (better, faster) than the measured performance figures from every other automotive review magazine.

IE: MotorTrend and CAR rate the GTR's 0-60mph figure at 3.5 and 3.6 respectively.

The same thing happened with the C63, C&D tested it at 3.9s 0-60mph while the rest of the magazine world rated it at above 4... generally 4.1-4.3s.

Just an observation...

OzCarfreak · 04-05-2008, 05:41 PM

Let me assure you... it is unreal in the flesh, an absolute stunner.. makes RS/C63/M3 look like old men.

ToothDoc · 04-05-2008, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M3NTAL

I find it interesting that C&D's measured performance figures for cars always seem to be (better, faster) than the measured performance figures from every other automotive review magazine.

IE: MotorTrend and CAR rate the GTR's 0-60mph figure at 3.5 and 3.6 respectively.

The same thing happened with the C63, C&D tested it at 3.9s 0-60mph while the rest of the magazine world rated it at above 4... generally 4.1-4.3s.

Just an observation...

Even EDMUND'S who is ALWAYS slower says 3.3 with the launch control. So, maybe it's just traction?

e46e92love · 04-06-2008, 11:31 AM

One word for you: SICK.

M3NTAL · 04-06-2008, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToothDoc

Even EDMUND'S who is ALWAYS slower says 3.3 with the launch control. So, maybe it's just traction?

Yeah, and every car is different. I've seen dyno-graphs from two identical factory spec MINI Cooper S' and they differ by 10 or so hp. There are a whole lot of variables that come into play.

It's just an observation...

RandyB · 04-06-2008, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M3NTAL

Yeah, and every car is different. I've seen dyno-graphs from two identical factory spec MINI Cooper S' and they differ by 10 or so hp. There are a whole lot of variables that come into play.

It's just an observation...

Especially when you add forced induction to the mix.

JEllis · 04-06-2008, 07:52 PM

GTR is fantastic car...always has....

Jason

sayemthree · 04-06-2008, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spearfisher

that is really one hell of a performer, I guess I could learn to love the front, .

dont worry - you wil only be seeing the rear of it! hahahaaaa!

OBI_agent · 04-19-2008, 05:52 PM

Damn....the car gets pretty impressive mileage in city.....for that kind of performance I can only say wow....

Bunkei · 04-20-2008, 08:52 PM

The styling (inside and out) is not my cup o' tea, but the performance more than makes up for it. I have a hard time believing that this car is pulling 11.5 1/4 times with only 480 hp. Perhaps it's not so much underrated as having such a neat launch system, and that DCT may help too

.

ZMonkey11 · 04-22-2008, 12:30 PM

I agree wholeheartedly that you have to see this car in person. People were just GAWKING at the GT-R in the Dallas Autoshow. I always thought it was kind of ugly in the pictures, but this car is SUPER clean. I watched the car spin around it's display for a good 15-20 minutes before I moved on, and before I left the autoshow, I came back to stare at it again. Even the Ferraris and Aston Martins didn't get this type of attention.

03-24-2008, 10:42 AM	#1
gbb357 Captain Drives: IS300 Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: New York Posts: 707 iTrader: (0)	Car and Driver's GTR test: 0-60 3.3 and 11.5 1/4 mile And still gets 21 MPG highway! from NAGTROC: Last edited by gbb357; 03-24-2008 at 11:33 AM.
	Tweet

03-24-2008, 04:45 PM	#2
Keto Major Drives: 550i M-sport AW Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: N'awlins Posts: 1,089 iTrader: (1)	ZOMG, that interior is godawful, but what a fantastic car. If only I had the cash to make it the weekend ride... __________________ '11 550i, pics soon

03-24-2008, 05:33 PM	#4
BCMPOWER Captain Drives: 08 Silverstone II M3 Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Silver Spring MD Posts: 629 iTrader: (0)	Performance car bargan of the decade! .99G's and four seat GT Nissan has come to the gunfight with Nukes! __________________

04-06-2008, 11:31 AM	#12
e46e92love Colonel Drives: e92 ///M3; X3 (wife's) Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: The East Side of Things Posts: 2,990 iTrader: (0)	One word for you: SICK. __________________ "...it's not about the money and not about the brand of the car, it's about handling,performance and passion......And that, no other car has all together like an M3........when you talk about the most complete car the M is invincible." --Tony Kanaan.

04-06-2008, 07:52 PM	#15
JEllis Brigadier General Drives: E36 M3, 997S Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: San Diego Posts: 3,381 iTrader: (1)	GTR is fantastic car...always has.... Jason __________________

03-24-2008, 05:25 PM	#3
spearfisher Lieutenant Drives: C6 ZO6 Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: FL Posts: 409 iTrader: (0)	that is really one hell of a performer, I guess I could learn to love the front, I can just imagine what that will do with a electronic boost controller, intake and exhaust.

03-24-2008, 07:23 PM	#5
RandyB Lieutenant Colonel Drives: '03 330i, '09 M3 Coupe Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Texas Posts: 1,504 iTrader: (0)	C&D observed mpg: 16 Good numbers. Not a pretty face though.

04-05-2008, 04:50 PM	#9
M3NTAL Baller, Shot Caller Drives: MINI Cooper S, AMG G55 & more Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: South Bend, IN, USA Posts: 86 iTrader: (0)	I find it interesting that C&D's measured performance figures for cars always seem to be (better, faster) than the measured performance figures from every other automotive review magazine. IE: MotorTrend and CAR rate the GTR's 0-60mph figure at 3.5 and 3.6 respectively. The same thing happened with the C63, C&D tested it at 3.9s 0-60mph while the rest of the magazine world rated it at above 4... generally 4.1-4.3s. Just an observation...

04-05-2008, 05:41 PM	#10
OzCarfreak Private First Class Drives: Merc / BMW /Audi Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Sydney Posts: 131 iTrader: (0)	Let me assure you... it is unreal in the flesh, an absolute stunner.. makes RS/C63/M3 look like old men.

04-19-2008, 05:52 PM	#17
OBI_agent D to the X to the B! Drives: ABS,American bargain supercar Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Dubai Posts: 2,083 iTrader: (0)	Damn....the car gets pretty impressive mileage in city.....for that kind of performance I can only say wow.... __________________ 11 corvette C6

04-20-2008, 08:52 PM	#18
Bunkei Anti-Fanboy Drives: 2007 BMW 335i Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 473 iTrader: (0)	The styling (inside and out) is not my cup o' tea, but the performance more than makes up for it. I have a hard time believing that this car is pulling 11.5 1/4 times with only 480 hp. Perhaps it's not so much underrated as having such a neat launch system, and that DCT may help too .

04-22-2008, 12:30 PM	#19
ZMonkey11 New Member Drives: Nissan Altima Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Frisco, TX Posts: 28 iTrader: (0)	I agree wholeheartedly that you have to see this car in person. People were just GAWKING at the GT-R in the Dallas Autoshow. I always thought it was kind of ugly in the pictures, but this car is SUPER clean. I watched the car spin around it's display for a good 15-20 minutes before I moved on, and before I left the autoshow, I came back to stare at it again. Even the Ferraris and Aston Martins didn't get this type of attention.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search