BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Mechanical Maintenance: Break-in / Oil & Fluids / Servicing
 
PYSPEED
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      06-19-2014, 11:38 PM   #1
Mikulski
Private First Class
4

 
Mikulski's Avatar
 
Drives: 09' ///M3
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pennington, NJ


Posts: 143
iTrader: (0)

Rod Bearings Replaced

Hey everyone I recently got my rod bearings replaced almost 2 weeks ago and I would like to share my results. Car Specs:

July 2009 build date
Purchased at 54,522 miles
Bearings replaced at 58,768 miles
Three previous owners

I had no abnormal noises other than the metallic "tink" when the clutch engages (Guibo) which will be replaced soon. Car ran great with VERY little exterior and interior imperfections. I was aware of rod bearings BEFORE I purchased the car but I had the impression that it was strictly with the S85 engine. When I started reading of the rod bearing failures on the forum for the S65 I had the urge to get them replaced ASAP. It was actually quite hard for me to enjoy the car not knowing what damage was under the hood. If I bought it from the original owner I would have greater peace of mind but this wasn't the case. Better safe than sorry for a relatively inexpensive procedure.

I'm grateful I went through with this as I was told this was the beginning of the end for the bearings. No damage was done to the crankshaft In order to REDUCE unnecessary damage proper warm up and ~5K mile oil changes will be adhered to. I want to say this is merely to help everyone get a better idea of if they should have theirs replaced as well. In no way do I mean to frighten anyone that their rod bearings are going to fail.


Pictures:
















Cylinder #1 Rod Bearing (Upper)



Cylinder #2 Rod Bearing (Upper)



Cylinder #3 Rod Bearing (Upper)



Cylinder #4 Rod Bearing (Upper)



Cylinder #5 Rod Bearing (Upper)



Cylinder #6 Rod Bearing (Upper)



Cylinder #7 Rod Bearing (Upper)



Cylinder #8 Rod Bearing (Upper)
Appreciate 0
      06-19-2014, 11:55 PM   #2
tinman831
Captain
9

 
Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: DFW


Posts: 793
iTrader: (0)

=/
Appreciate 0
      06-20-2014, 12:07 AM   #3
racedoc11
Major
United_States
56

 
racedoc11's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Audi RS5 & 08 M3 E93 SOLD
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA


Posts: 1,271
iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2013 Audi RS5  [5.00]
2008 E93 M3  [5.00]
How much does it cost to replace them?
Appreciate 0
      06-20-2014, 10:32 PM   #4
aus
Major General
204

 
Drives: Odysse
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seal Beach, CA


Posts: 7,373
iTrader: (5)

Thanks. Good post.
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 07:37 AM   #5
Rupes
Captain
United_States
43

 
Rupes's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 E92 M3
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA


Posts: 786
iTrader: (0)

Yours look better than most I've seen. Did you do any oil analysis prior to this?
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 11:38 AM   #6
Wendall
***Major MammelToe
United_States
72

 
Wendall's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3 SG coupe
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Orange County, CA


Posts: 1,146
iTrader: (3)

Mine looked exactly the same at 51k miles. I'm very happy I had them replaced. Peace of mind.
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 12:03 PM   #7
tdott
Lieutenant
17

 
Drives: M3
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: T.Dot


Posts: 470
iTrader: (1)

Nice. Thanks for sharing. Where did you get them done and what did you replace them with?
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 04:00 PM   #8
dparm
Major
United_States
25

 
dparm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011.5 E90 M3
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago, IL


Posts: 1,447
iTrader: (0)

Mikulski,

I would still recommend you get UOAs done to determine the correct oil change interval and to establish baseline/monitor trends in the long-term.
__________________
2011.5 AW M3 sedan ZCP
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2014, 12:48 PM   #9
Mikulski
Private First Class
4

 
Mikulski's Avatar
 
Drives: 09' ///M3
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pennington, NJ


Posts: 143
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dparm View Post
Mikulski,

I would still recommend you get UOAs done to determine the correct oil change interval and to establish baseline/monitor trends in the long-term.
I agree dparm. I will be starting a journal for my car.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdott View Post
Nice. Thanks for sharing. Where did you get them done and what did you replace them with?
Got it done by ACM in Fairless Hills NJ. They used BMW's upgraded bearings.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupes View Post
Yours look better than most I've seen. Did you do any oil analysis prior to this?
Thought about doing an analysis of my oil when I got the bearings replaced. Slipt my mind to grab a sample though.
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2014, 01:13 PM   #10
PhillyNate
ENTHUSIAST
United_States
32

 
PhillyNate's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Toyota GT-86
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia


Posts: 2,037
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
I do believe this rod bearing issue is WAY overblown but those pics DO NOT make me wish I had the car back...Thanks for posting. Only 54k miles, yikes.
__________________

"what I'm driving here...is an ending." Jeremy Clarkson
2014 Whiteout Toyota GT-86 6mt(Presently enjoying WAY more than anticipated)
2011 Alpine White BMW M3 6mt ZCP Coupe(forced retirement 06/06/14)
2008 Alpine White BMW 328i 6mt Coupe(retired 06/21/11
)
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2014, 01:28 PM   #11
marksae
Private First Class
2

 
Drives: ///M
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bay Area


Posts: 192
iTrader: (1)

Thanks for posting your findings. It's good info.

While your rod bearings don't look great, they don't look as bad as some of the other pictures posted on this forum.

I didn't know BMW offered "upgraded" bearings. Are your bearings treated?
__________________
09 E90 AW ///M3 6MT
07 LBP S2K
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2014, 01:36 PM   #12
kerrit
Lieutenant
13

 
Drives: 2008 Melbourne Red E90 M3
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Bellevue, WA


Posts: 441
iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Thanks for posting. Agreed that these bearings don't look as bad as most posted - they aren't even really into the copper layer. I think this still proves though that this should definitely be a maintenance item - probably around 75k miles for me, assuming blackstone reports look decent.
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2014, 01:41 PM   #13
thetastelingers
Master lurker
9

 
thetastelingers's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 E92 M3
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Soddy Daisy


Posts: 246
iTrader: (1)

I would like to know cost as well.
Do they just R&R or do they mic the crank while they are in there?
Do they install the bearings on the rod and mic them as well?

Thanks for sharing.
Appreciate 0
      06-26-2014, 07:14 PM   #14
Killerfish2012
Major
35

 
Drives: E90 335I, E92 M3
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Midwest


Posts: 1,325
iTrader: (4)

I agree with others that the bearings don't look that bad. I would say they look like the previous owners ran 10W60, for 15K intervals. Once bearing failure is imminent, it should sound like this:


If your motor didn't sound anything like that, then those bearings could have gone 50-100K miles or more. for all we know the new bearings may go back to looking like the old ones within 15K miles, so long as you still use 10W60
__________________
E90 335I: FBO +wavetrac LSD
E92 M3: K&N, V1, Yokohama AD08
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2014, 08:57 AM   #15
Mikulski
Private First Class
4

 
Mikulski's Avatar
 
Drives: 09' ///M3
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pennington, NJ


Posts: 143
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Killerfish2012 View Post
I agree with others that the bearings don't look that bad. I would say they look like the previous owners ran 10W60, for 15K intervals. Once bearing failure is imminent, it should sound like this:


If your motor didn't sound anything like that, then those bearings could have gone 50-100K miles or more. for all we know the new bearings may go back to looking like the old ones within 15K miles, so long as you still use 10W60
Thanks for the input Killerfish. I agree the bearings may have gone that much longer but why would I wait and let it get to the point of imminent failure? At that point you can be damaging your crankshaft, but hell if you're gonna sell your car before it gets to that point and would rather have someone else deal with that headache go ahead. Having said that I really hope the "upgraded" bearings as they called are better for the car.
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2014, 09:07 AM   #16
Killerfish2012
Major
35

 
Drives: E90 335I, E92 M3
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Midwest


Posts: 1,325
iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikulski View Post
Thanks for the input Killerfish. I agree the bearings may have gone that much longer but why would I wait and let it get to the point of imminent failure? At that point you can be damaging your crankshaft, but hell if you're gonna sell your car before it gets to that point and would rather have someone else deal with that headache go ahead. Having said that I really hope the "upgraded" bearings as they called are better for the car.
You're welcome bud. I just got my '09 M3 not too long ago, and I'm at 98K miles now. The engine sounds prestine, so I'm not worried about this rod bearing thing. I'm not going to change a part if nothing is wrong with it. Looks like the previous owner used Mobil 1 10W40 high mileage, so it's obvious that using a very thick oil like castrol 10W60, and running oil 15K mile oil changes is pretty much asking for it.
__________________
E90 335I: FBO +wavetrac LSD
E92 M3: K&N, V1, Yokohama AD08
Appreciate 0
      07-26-2014, 03:45 PM   #17
Mikulski
Private First Class
4

 
Mikulski's Avatar
 
Drives: 09' ///M3
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pennington, NJ


Posts: 143
iTrader: (0)

Just got back my Oil analysis. Remember this was a "Break in " period in which I didn't exceed 4K rpm for the first ~1800 miles.....EVER


Appreciate 0
      07-26-2014, 04:15 PM   #18
BigBoosting
First Lieutenant
10

 
Drives: 09' M3 6MT
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Savannah


Posts: 352
iTrader: (2)

You don't have to break in new bearings so as long as that is all you replaced then there was no reason to put around under 4K rpm.
Appreciate 0
      07-26-2014, 05:28 PM   #19
Mikulski
Private First Class
4

 
Mikulski's Avatar
 
Drives: 09' ///M3
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pennington, NJ


Posts: 143
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBoosting View Post
You don't have to break in new bearings so as long as that is all you replaced then there was no reason to put around under 4K rpm.
I'm assuming this was to ensure proper fitment as there may have been slight imperfections on the bearings during manufacturing. By adhering to lower RPMs the crankshaft will have a greater opportunity to remove these imperfections gradually.
Appreciate 0
      07-26-2014, 06:25 PM   #20
JsL
Private
0

 
Drives: 2011 AW M3 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SF Bay Area


Posts: 63
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Killerfish2012 View Post
You're welcome bud. I just got my '09 M3 not too long ago, and I'm at 98K miles now. The engine sounds prestine, so I'm not worried about this rod bearing thing. I'm not going to change a part if nothing is wrong with it. Looks like the previous owner used Mobil 1 10W40 high mileage, so it's obvious that using a very thick oil like castrol 10W60, and running oil 15K mile oil changes is pretty much asking for it.
You make it sound like 10W60 and BMW's oil change interval is the definitive cause of bearing failure. That just adds to the paranoia around here.

I think the correct statement is to get an oil report and determine 1) if you have bad bearings 2) what is the correct oil chamge interval for your particular engine 3) ability to monitor your bearing wear
Appreciate 0
      07-26-2014, 09:55 PM   #21
MFKN3
Colonel
Australia
68

 
MFKN3's Avatar
 
Drives: 4.5L stroker s/c E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Australia


Posts: 2,037
iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JsL View Post
determine 1) if you have bad bearings
If it's an S65, that's a given.

Well it's not actually the bearings, but the tolerance and the oil being too thick at startup which then results in bearing damage.
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2014, 04:11 AM   #22
SenorFunkyPants
Colonel
United Kingdom
47

 
SenorFunkyPants's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 DCT M3
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK


Posts: 2,580
iTrader: (0)

Its worth noting that if this bearing set was sent to Clevite for analysis they would categorize the wear as perfectly normal.
Given the predominant wear pattern seen in poor condition bearings removed from S65 engines - one or two upper bearings showing copper - I suspect that the problem is nothing at all to do with the 10W60 oil but instead a function of either poor quality control of the bearings shells themselves...where some are out of thickness spec promoting high wear in those bearings while others remain perfectly normal....or some other mechanism that causes high wear in only one or two bearings.
Its highly unlikely that using 10W60 can cause selectively high wear in only a couple of bearing sets.
__________________

Last edited by SenorFunkyPants; 07-27-2014 at 04:35 AM.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST