BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
BPM
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-23-2015, 12:38 PM   #111
e92zero
Captain
212
Rep
875
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 BW
Join Date: May 2010
Location: somewhere in US

iTrader: (1)

I am interested in this too but sorry for the OP to go through this much trouble and still not working. It's interesting that the F80 carbon shaft retains the factory torque disc while this one do away with it. Wonder if there are some weight difference/benefit doing it one way or the other.

Good luck to the OP.
Appreciate 0
      01-23-2015, 01:35 PM   #112
whats77inaname
Banned
United_States
829
Rep
3,387
Posts

Drives: when at all possible
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tx

iTrader: (25)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
Depends on whether new m3 shaft is longer or shorter. The 700 rwhp guys drag racing are not breaking stock shafts. Why change?
For me it isn't about the strength, it's a matter of rotational mass saved. If there's a significant amount of rotational mass saved it might be worth looking into, but like I said, it's have to be quite a bit of weight. Saving 2 lbs? Meh, not worth it to me. Saving 6lbs? That's another discussion.
Appreciate 0
      01-23-2015, 01:56 PM   #113
Hujan
Brigadier General
Hujan's Avatar
United_States
569
Rep
3,742
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: .

iTrader: (16)

Edit: Looks like the weight savings of this shaft are negligible leaving only the other potential benefits:

The fact that this is a one-piece design, unlike the factory shaft which is a two-piece design with a coupler in the middle. I gotta believe that the one-piece design will, similar to firmer differential and transmission mounts, result in more direct transfer of power from transmission to rear wheels.

Then there are also the potential benefits of sound damping for those of us who are running solid subframe and differential mounts and therefore have some noise from the drivetrain that we'd like to muffle.

Last edited by Hujan; 01-23-2015 at 07:01 PM..
Appreciate 0
      01-23-2015, 02:57 PM   #114
whats77inaname
Banned
United_States
829
Rep
3,387
Posts

Drives: when at all possible
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tx

iTrader: (25)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hujan View Post
Let's be clear here: I believe it was stated earlier in the thread that the stock shaft weighs 30 lbs. while the CF shaft weights 20 lbs. If the CF shaft was weighed without the 2lb.-adaptor plate, that is still an 8 lb. difference in rotating weight on the driveline.
Let's be clear indeed
Quote:
Originally Posted by squartus View Post


I weighed both the drive shafts for you guys wanting to know.
I was surprised on the weight:
OEM + guibo 24.6 LBS
DSS + Adapter plate 22.2 LBS

Checked it a couple times to make sure was right, kept getting same result.
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showpos...&postcount=104

And I have the Delrin/alum diff/subframe bushing setup, as well.

Last edited by whats77inaname; 01-23-2015 at 03:06 PM..
Appreciate 0
      01-23-2015, 03:38 PM   #115
thekurgan
Bad Lieutenant
thekurgan's Avatar
United_States
233
Rep
3,517
Posts

Drives: E90M3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 BMW M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by italyix View Post
Damn, really disappointed this did not work out, as my 2015 plans included the CF shaft for weight savings...guess I'm staying stock and use the money to upgrade the diff (mine is basically blown).

Btw, lb to lb for bang for buck, CF roof (10lbs) is the same price and sheds (if you have moonroof) around 45lbs (45lbs of glass + 10lb of steel from roof) off the top. Better rotational savings are achieved by swapping wheels and tires....or for 2 lbs don't for two days
The glass doesn't weigh 45 pounds. I removed mine and my past E90 to replace the gasket, and you can toss it around like a frisbee. Maybe the underlying cable, cartridges and motors add to the weight, but not the glass alone.
__________________
02 E39M5 | TiAg/Schwartz | Tubi Rumore | Ultimate Ti Pedals | E60 SSK | Jim Blanton 3.45 40/100% | Coby Alcantara | StrongStrut STB
Appreciate 1
      01-23-2015, 06:58 PM   #116
Hujan
Brigadier General
Hujan's Avatar
United_States
569
Rep
3,742
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: .

iTrader: (16)

Quote:
Originally Posted by whats77inaname View Post
Let's be clear indeed


http://www.m3post.com/forums/showpos...&postcount=104

And I have the Delrin/alum diff/subframe bushing setup, as well.
Wow, my sincere apologies. I completely missed that post. I wrongly assumed everyone was focusing on the weight of the adapter plate. My bad. Thanks for setting my straight. I will edit my post.

I can't believe there is only a 2 lbs. difference between them. The OEM design must be really good or their shaft is not actually CF.
Appreciate 0
      01-24-2015, 12:38 PM   #117
whats77inaname
Banned
United_States
829
Rep
3,387
Posts

Drives: when at all possible
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tx

iTrader: (25)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hujan View Post
Wow, my sincere apologies. I completely missed that post. I wrongly assumed everyone was focusing on the weight of the adapter plate. My bad. Thanks for setting my straight. I will edit my post.
It's cool, my man
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hujan View Post
Then there are also the potential benefits of sound damping for those of us who are running solid subframe and differential mounts and therefore have some noise from the drivetrain that we'd like to muffle.
Just curious, running that Akra you have, how much diff noise can you actually hear?
Appreciate 0
      01-24-2015, 12:53 PM   #118
Hujan
Brigadier General
Hujan's Avatar
United_States
569
Rep
3,742
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: .

iTrader: (16)

Quote:
Originally Posted by whats77inaname View Post
Just curious, running that Akra you have, how much diff noise can you actually hear?
Unfortunately, quite a bit, actually. The diff whine does not bother me around town when you're frequently accelerating and decelerating. The only time it's a bit of a pain is steady-state cruising on the highway. At 3250 RPM the Akra is pretty quiet and the diff whine is at its loudest with no change in pitch.

BTW, I used to complain quite a bit about my Akra Evo. I found it very loud and bassy at low RPMs. I could never understand those who said it was too tame, almost OEM-like. As it turns out, it was not installed correctly, resulting in some unwanted resonance and noise from, among other things, a small leak at the headers. I had my second Akra Evo installed by MRF and it is completely different experience. I am very pleased with the Akra Evo now.
Appreciate 0
      01-24-2015, 03:08 PM   #119
squartus
Major
United_States
314
Rep
1,017
Posts

Drives: 2010 E92 M3 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mississippi

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 E92 BMW M3  [10.00]
Yea im supercharged with AA signature exhaust and test pipes, pretty grunty and loud. Can hear the diff whine over exhaust, supercharger whine and radio depending on the rpm.
Which is the main reason im trying the CF driveshaft.
__________________


4.4L LC stroker/ESS VT2-625/Volk te37 sl's/AA exhaust/DSS Carbon Fiber driveshaft/ARH Headers.. etc
Appreciate 0
      01-26-2015, 10:14 AM   #120
italyix
Captain
italyix's Avatar
United_States
141
Rep
980
Posts

Drives: '08 E90 M3
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bay Area

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by thekurgan View Post
The glass doesn't weigh 45 pounds. I removed mine and my past E90 to replace the gasket, and you can toss it around like a frisbee. Maybe the underlying cable, cartridges and motors add to the weight, but not the glass alone.
I meant to say the whole moonroof assembly including rails and such, yes if the glass weighed 45 lbs, I'd be worried.

There was thread on another owner who did the CF conversion, that's where I got the 45lb number.
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2015, 07:32 PM   #121
squartus
Major
United_States
314
Rep
1,017
Posts

Drives: 2010 E92 M3 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mississippi

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 E92 BMW M3  [10.00]
Alright got my new bolts in today 50mm bolts is whats needed for the e90 m3 adapter plate.
Everything went in super smooth, the double CVS make it much easier to mount and work with vs the old driveshaft. Just letting the RTV silicone cure (needed to seal the diff to the driveshaft as does not have a plate on it like the oem shaft) before taking it out and seeing how it feels and sounds.

Small bolts are 60lbs torque, 3 large trans flange bolts are 74lbs torque incase anyone needs to know.

Few pics of it installed:


__________________


4.4L LC stroker/ESS VT2-625/Volk te37 sl's/AA exhaust/DSS Carbon Fiber driveshaft/ARH Headers.. etc
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2015, 08:02 PM   #122
M33too
Lieutenant
90
Rep
465
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ

iTrader: (3)

Looking good! Let us know how it feels.
__________________
2008 E92 M3 ESS VT2-6XX 10.4@135

Appreciate 0
      01-27-2015, 08:19 PM   #123
e92zero
Captain
212
Rep
875
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 BW
Join Date: May 2010
Location: somewhere in US

iTrader: (1)

Looks great!!!! Interested in the need of the RTV sealant. Shouldn't they have an integrated gasket/seal of some sort on the adapter plate for the diff side?
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2015, 09:25 PM   #124
ashtaron14
Major
ashtaron14's Avatar
Hong Kong
1123
Rep
1,083
Posts

Drives: G80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: HK

iTrader: (0)

So after getting the correct adapter plates, the correct length for bolts, and RTV silicone cure (not provided I guess), it's finally done!

Lets hope the diff whine goes away.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2015, 11:11 PM   #125
Hujan
Brigadier General
Hujan's Avatar
United_States
569
Rep
3,742
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: .

iTrader: (16)

Looks great! Must be a relief to have that thing in finally.

Eager to hear what, if anything, it does for the diff whine.
Appreciate 0
      01-28-2015, 06:44 AM   #126
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5237
Rep
10,616
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by e92zero View Post
Looks great!!!! Interested in the need of the RTV sealant. Shouldn't they have an integrated gasket/seal of some sort on the adapter plate for the diff side?
I have used a couple of DSS DS on other BMWs and they came with siliconed endcaps for the CV joint. My guess is either DSS forgot it, it fell off in the packaging and the owner missed it, DSS has not gotten around to stamping out a cap yet because it is uncertain what the diff input flange looks like, of the E90M3 diff input flange for some reason does not fit a cap. I would rather have a cap so I can remove the DS without making a mess and so the CV is not at risk of contamination if temporarily off the car.
Appreciate 0
      01-28-2015, 10:27 AM   #127
squartus
Major
United_States
314
Rep
1,017
Posts

Drives: 2010 E92 M3 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mississippi

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 E92 BMW M3  [10.00]
When I asked them about it I was told the way it was made that it did not have room for an end cap, they are the ones that said it needed the RTV silicone for a proper seal.
Not sure if that was true or not but is what they told me over the phone.
__________________


4.4L LC stroker/ESS VT2-625/Volk te37 sl's/AA exhaust/DSS Carbon Fiber driveshaft/ARH Headers.. etc
Appreciate 0
      01-28-2015, 10:45 AM   #128
e92zero
Captain
212
Rep
875
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 BW
Join Date: May 2010
Location: somewhere in US

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
I have used a couple of DSS DS on other BMWs and they came with siliconed endcaps for the CV joint. My guess is either DSS forgot it, it fell off in the packaging and the owner missed it, DSS has not gotten around to stamping out a cap yet because it is uncertain what the diff input flange looks like, of the E90M3 diff input flange for some reason does not fit a cap. I would rather have a cap so I can remove the DS without making a mess and so the CV is not at risk of contamination if temporarily off the car.
I agree and that's my point. An endcap or some sort would seem more fitting and cleaner. I can't tell clearly in the picture but are those plastic zip ties on the 2 ends of the driveshaft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by squartus View Post
When I asked them about it I was told the way it was made that it did not have room for an end cap, they are the ones that said it needed the RTV silicone for a proper seal.
Not sure if that was true or not but is what they told me over the phone.
I don't know and I never saw this product in person but having to use RTV just seem so 'patch-up' and afterthought. If they designed the driveshaft from the ground up for the E92 M3, they should allow for enough room for an end cap, right? Given the ordeal that you went through, it just seem that they threw what they have on their bench together and let you be the genuine pig. Maybe I am completely off base but it just seems wrong on their part. Hopefully the driving experience will offset these 'detail'.
Appreciate 0
      01-28-2015, 10:50 AM   #129
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5237
Rep
10,616
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

I agree. There is room for an endcap with either a shorter DS or a thinner adapter. The only reason not to have one would be if the diff input flange somehow did not allow one. I have not studied the E90M3 diff, but I have used DSS DS on BMW 188mm 4 bolt input diffs and 210mm 6 bolt input diffs and both those DS had stamped sheetmetal endcaps for the end of the CV at the diff end (both those DS had a CV only at the diff end and used a u-joint at the trans end).
Appreciate 0
      01-28-2015, 01:00 PM   #130
squartus
Major
United_States
314
Rep
1,017
Posts

Drives: 2010 E92 M3 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mississippi

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 E92 BMW M3  [10.00]
Here is a pic of the backing plate on the OEM driveshaft. Think to story is more like they did not want to go through the trouble of stamping it out since it looks like it would take a bit of time to get right. OEM backing plate locks into the diff like a socket, actually had to yank the shit out of it to remove it because it was seated in so well.
__________________


4.4L LC stroker/ESS VT2-625/Volk te37 sl's/AA exhaust/DSS Carbon Fiber driveshaft/ARH Headers.. etc
Appreciate 0
      01-28-2015, 01:27 PM   #131
e92zero
Captain
212
Rep
875
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 BW
Join Date: May 2010
Location: somewhere in US

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by squartus View Post
Here is a pic of the backing plate on the OEM driveshaft. Think to story is more like they did not want to go through the trouble of stamping it out since it looks like it would take a bit of time to get right. OEM backing plate locks into the diff like a socket, actually had to yank the shit out of it to remove it because it was seated in so well.
Hmm, I agree they didn't want to take the time/trouble to do it right. But then, it means this new driveshaft will be completely relying on the 6 bolts where as the oem one relies on the actual backing plate for the torsional/twisting force. Will be interesting to see how it will hold up long term. Do you have a chance to take it out for a spin yet? Must have been a long wait with all the trouble you have to go through.
Appreciate 0
      01-28-2015, 06:44 PM   #132
squartus
Major
United_States
314
Rep
1,017
Posts

Drives: 2010 E92 M3 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mississippi

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 E92 BMW M3  [10.00]
Not to worried about just the bolts holding it, only 3 bolts hold it to the trans so 5 should do the trick.
Finally got to take her out for a nice drive, after needing to turn right back around because the heat shielding by the rear diff was rubbing on the driveshaft "horrible noise btw" but was quickly fixed with some tin snips.

Now first impressions, drive train slop is TOTALLY gone we are talking no more clunk or lashing at all. Feels like a rubber band, same with rev match downshifts or letting off the gas and engine breaking kicking in. Before was always bit of a clunk or lurch not anymore. I would of bought the one piece driveshaft for that alone.
Shifts are much smoother as well, I assume this is from less things moving around kind of like new solid trans mounts but much better.
Now I always hear that these types of drive shafts give better traction so one of the first things I did was roll out of 1st and slam 2nd "M dynamic mode on" now what usually happens is traction control kicks in like crazy then it kills engine power and you end up going nowhere. Not only did it not kill power but the traction control light never even flashed!!
I tried this a few times with the same result, now keep in mind im running a ESS 625 kit as well.

Was getting dark so I did not try out any hard launches with DSC off but I will tommrow. Usually if I just punch it ill break traction in 1st ass throws out, 2nd melt rubber with ass thrown out whole time and 3rd ass comes in with a bit of wheel spin then straightens out.

Now... for the bad news... Does nothing for rear diff whine from having solid rear diff mounts. It may actually make it a bit louder until 70mph so if you looking at this for any kind of sound deadening effects its a total bust.
__________________


4.4L LC stroker/ESS VT2-625/Volk te37 sl's/AA exhaust/DSS Carbon Fiber driveshaft/ARH Headers.. etc
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST