|
|
10-16-2011, 11:53 AM | #1 |
Private
9
Rep 58
Posts |
Supercharger+6MT=Suicide?
Recently found a great opportunity to trade my e92 DCT for a 6MT (both '11). The DCT, although it is the superior transmission, just doesn't cut it in terms of driving experience. Upshifting and downshifting only gets boring! Plus, the m3 I have now is on a lease and the 6MT would be bought out. I don't have the option to buy out my current one, long story. Anyways, I was thinking down the road to put in a S/C into the stick m3, is it too much power to control? Anyone have a story to tell? thanks
|
10-16-2011, 01:12 PM | #2 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 169
Posts |
If you feel there's too much power, you can always elect not to push the accelerator down all the way
But honestly, I don't see how having a 6MT versus a DCT would mean the difference for losing control with a supercharger. You may feel more of an urgency to get the shifting done faster in manual, but that's about it. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 02:14 PM | #3 | |
Private
9
Rep 58
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 03:05 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant Colonel
177
Rep 1,783
Posts |
It isn't something you should just "jump" into. There is a sense of responsibility that comes with it. You can also consider looking into different driving schools, etc.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 04:17 PM | #7 |
Lieutenant General
5178
Rep 10,553
Posts |
If anything, the power should be more controllable with the 6 speed since you are choosing the gear. Performance will be slightly less since boost will drop while you shift (more slowly than the DCT shifts). The 6MT is likely stronger than the more complex DCT. Torque is still pretty low, so the clutch should be fine (clutches are rated by torque not rwhp). Even an ESS VT650 with all the bolt on mods is struggling to break 400 lbs rwtq.
Go for it. I have never had too much power. With a centrifugal supercharger, the boost comes only with rpm and with a high revving low torque engine like the S65, power comes in slowly and predictably. Centrifugal supercharged power is very controllable. You won't have any issues. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 04:49 PM | #8 | |
Private
9
Rep 58
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 05:42 PM | #9 |
Lieutenant General
5178
Rep 10,553
Posts |
The best centrifugal is probably the ASA used by GPower. It is a planetary gear drive and spins faster than a traditional gear drive like the Vortech and makes great torque for a centrifugal, and is more compact, and is clutched. I am not sure if ASA has a blower big enough yet to compete with the Vortech, but they do have one that can make in the 550 rwhp range on these cars.
AA uses a planetary gear drive blower also. It spins fast also and makes pretty good torque for a centrifugal. It is compact enough to allow for a simple and reliable air to air intercooler. It is a bit on the small size so top end power does not have the same potential as the Vortech if you are going for the maximum. It will still make in the 525-550 rwhp range on these cars. Sometimes overall power is more important than peak power. Find a dyno and study the power curve. ESS uses the Vortech, which is simple, large and sturdy. It requires a water to air intercooler since it leaves little space for air to air piping, but air to water has its advantages -- a very short path for the cooled air into the engine. The Vortech spins slowly, relatively, and is not as torquey as a result in the midrange. But it has a pretty big impeller and makes great top end power. Gintani also uses the Vortech blower. Good luck. Tough choices and you can't really go wrong with any of them. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 06:47 PM | #11 |
Lieutenant General
5178
Rep 10,553
Posts |
VF is also Vortech with water/air intercooling, which seems to be the most popular combination used by the aftermarket supercharger kit makers.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 07:04 PM | #12 |
Private
9
Rep 58
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 07:43 PM | #13 |
Lieutenant General
5178
Rep 10,553
Posts |
I simply forgot to put them on my original list.
You will be spending a lot of money, so do some comparison shopping and find satisfied owners. The Vortech plus air/water concept is certainly good enough for others to be using similar setups. The tune will be the critical component. In terms of popularity, ESS appears to have sold the most E9x M3 systems by a considerable margin. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 08:06 PM | #14 |
Major
87
Rep 1,253
Posts
Drives: F10535, E90M3, E30M3, E28M5
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2017 Alpina B6 GC [0.00]
2014 535xi M Sport [0.00] 2014 X3 3.5 M Sport [0.00] 2011 M3 E90 [9.74] 2007 Z4 M Coupe [7.00] 1990 M3 [9.50] 1988 M5 [10.00] |
Just want to say my VT-1 doesn't have an Intercooler (I had limited $ Funds) and I haven't had any problems.
I "tracked" at Summit Point Main in July when the air temperature was 107 degrees. As stated above, many good SC choices. Good Luck!
__________________
ESS VT-1 550 | M24 Oil Cooler | Fall Line Half Cage | RaceTech 4009W | 6 pt Harness | Lifeline Zero 360 Fire Suppression | Rear Seat Delete | Motion Control DA Dampers w/remote reservoirs | 900/650 Hyperco Springs | RD Sport Sway Bars | Brembo 380 BBK | GC Camber Plates | Hoosier R7 | Eisenmann Sport | Stack Gauges | Painted Challenge Front Lip | Painted ZCP Rear Spoiler | Xpel Ultimate Film | LuxAngelEyes |
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 08:10 PM | #15 |
Brigadier General
249
Rep 3,157
Posts |
6MT+supercharged M3 = match made in heaven
__________________
Past: Gintani stage3 M3, Cayman GTS present: Porsche 993RWB, 964RS America,996 cupcar, 964 turbo 3.6,Macan Turbo,997GT2,930 turbo,i3, MINI JCW |
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 10:04 PM | #16 |
Lieutenant Colonel
264
Rep 1,883
Posts
Drives: 2011 E92 M3
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: One of the coasts...
|
You choose the gear in DCT too... Unless you use Auto mode all the time, which is stupid if you bought a DCT.
__________________
'11 BMW E92 ///M3 - ZCP and DCT
'15 Ford F-250 - Lariat, 6.7 Powerstroke Turbo-diesel |
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2011, 11:43 AM | #17 |
JOSH SHOKRI.
522
Rep 5,881
Posts
Drives: 991 GT3RS, 964, Raptor
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: los angeles, california.
|
+1. I've ran two different SC kits on my car and I wouldn't run this car without a supercharger at this point.
__________________
Current: 16 991 GT3RS , 91 964 C2, 17 Raptor | Past: 2015 991 GT3, 2015 i3,15 YMB F80 M3, 13 E92 M3 DCT, 08 E92 M3 6MT, 07 E60 M5, 02 E46 M3
Instagram: @josh_speeddistrict #SpeedDistrict @SpeedDistrict |
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2011, 01:00 PM | #19 |
1119
Rep 7,690
Posts |
I think the part about the Vortec blower making less torque than
the HKS is pure myth, maybe even sales pitch by the guys selling those blowers. I just downloaded a bunch of files from the Dyno Database (www.bmwdynodatabase.com) and when you compare the same boost and same octane, the Vortec has far more torque than the HKS blowers. Down low where it really counts, the Vortec has as much as 40ft/lbs more torque than either of those kits. The only way I could get the graphs to show more torque on the HKS blowers than the Vortec, was to compare against cars with 1.5-2.0 PSI less boost. It was hard to get an apples-apples comparison with the ASA blower since there's only one entry in the DynoDB for this type of blower. From what I saw, the ASA might have more torque than the Vortec up to a point. But just like the HKS, the ASA blower dyno chart showed it falling apart above 7000 RPMs. The power dropped like a rock at that point. I'll send links to the Dyno DB files I used in case anybody wants to do their own analysis. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2011, 03:17 PM | #20 | |
Lieutenant General
5178
Rep 10,553
Posts |
Quote:
ESS used to run the ASA blower (on the E46 M3 before the days of the E9X M3), but changed to the Vortech since it works pretty well over a broader power range and that helps with upgradeability of the kits. ESS made more midrange power with the compact and high speed ASA planetary gear drive blower than with the larger and slower Vortech fixed gear drive blower. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2011, 03:19 PM | #21 |
Brigadier General
406
Rep 3,583
Posts
Drives: 2017 M3
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ventura County, CA
|
where you at Jason??
6mt+Ess=550 whp= really fun to ride in.
__________________
2017 F80 YMB, ZCP, ZEC, ZLP, DCT. Production Date: 7/15/16
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2011, 01:57 PM | #22 |
Private
6
Rep 91
Posts |
Whenever I read posts like this, I get the urge to supercharge. Then I go for a drive and Im reminded how poor the traction of the rear wheels is. I have a stock 6MT (except for axle back) and 295's in the rear. Any temp less than 70 degrees and a i get excessive wheel spin. Even when its above 70 its not to hard to break them loose. Not to mention it takes about 15-20 to warm up the tires even under ideal temps. So unless Im cruising on the highway, i cant justify the extra power which for me, would get old with constant wheel spin. If I could manage the traction, it would be totally worth it!
And yes, my wheels are properly aligned and I have tried a dozen or more psi settings. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|