|
|
|
KEEP M3POST ALIVE BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER LINK! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-16-2010, 12:59 PM | #46 |
Major General
892
Rep 9,032
Posts |
Size Offset Weight (Pounds, approx.)
17x8 - 40et 15.7 17x8.5 - 40et 16.0 17x9 - 41et 16.4 18x9 - 41et 18.2 18x9.5 - 35et 18.8 18x10 - 43et 19.1 So it would take a 20mm spacer to use the 18x10? That's huge.
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 01:08 AM | #47 |
Major General
892
Rep 9,032
Posts |
Any updates on the JWL certificates for Apex and Forgstar wheels?
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 09:28 AM | #48 | |
Brigadier General
169
Rep 3,831
Posts |
Quote:
I think James@bimmerworld was running the 18x9.5 before. I would do those instead personally. If you want the 10" wheen get the MT1s instead.
__________________
Last edited by STALKER; 03-18-2010 at 09:35 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 12:49 PM | #49 |
Major General
892
Rep 9,032
Posts |
I would still need spacers, right? Thx
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 01:04 PM | #50 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
1765
Rep 7,651
Posts |
the TE37 are great wheels, but they are getting discontinued for BMW bolt patterns.
Rays is really making the move over to VR. G2 for BMW, which means that it will be hard to get replacements down the road. the G2 in 18" will work with the 380mm brembo with about 3mm clearance (just enough). As for the Advan wheels, even the 19" had a little bit of an issue with the Brembo 380mm brakes. the Bolt on the caliper had to be grinded down a little. As for weights, we don't have too much data on them. the only ones that we really post are ones that go through our store and we haven't had much 18" for the M3, except the HRE, Advan, and G2's and Neez. (many of which we either forgot to measure ).
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 05:45 PM | #51 | |
Major General
892
Rep 9,032
Posts |
Quote:
What's the "VR" you mention? I know about the G2 and assume they're not being discontinued since they're brand new.
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
Last edited by aus; 03-21-2010 at 09:47 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 05:46 PM | #52 |
Moderator
673
Rep 4,737
Posts |
I think I've found the perfect wheels after talking to Ben@TireRack... 18x9 F 18x10 R (18x9 only shows up under 335i)
JWL/VIA certified, under 20 lbs, no spacers needed, and only $300 each! Will these clear StopTech 380 mm BBK??? |
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 06:14 PM | #53 |
Major General
374
Rep 8,033
Posts |
rldzhao, several people on this forum have been running that wheel on their E9X M3s. I remember seeing some reports in the track section. I suggest going for at least a 9.5" rim on the front. I thought the 9.5"/10.5" combo worked really well.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 06:56 PM | #54 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
151
Rep 1,599
Posts |
Link to TR Motorsports Wheel Discussion
Quote:
. I didn't see anything in the thread about big brakes though.
__________________
Last edited by calintexas; 03-19-2010 at 07:42 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 11:04 PM | #57 |
Moderator
673
Rep 4,737
Posts |
May I ask why 9.5" front? I would like to avoid spacers.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2010, 03:03 AM | #58 |
New Member
0
Rep 18
Posts |
9.5 will squeeze on the front and avoid spacers, but if you just get a smaller offset on new rims you can achieve the samne thing BUT some rims (the cheaper ones) tend to have very few moulds so you jujst end up with big lumps of rim hub metal where the spacers were check your new rims for correct weight of the offset you are buying or they will just give you the weight of the rim with the biggest offset |
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2010, 08:36 AM | #59 |
Major General
374
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Because I am betting that with time you'll want to put on wider front tires than a 9" rim will allow you on the track. The car is heavy, and wider tires should help under braking. If you invest in 9" rims now, the chances are you'll be thinking about wider ones later knowing you can stuff stuff even 10" rims in there (I think around 25mm offset would work). The 10"/10.5" combo would be interesting, but I don't think the car has a rotation issue under power, and 9.5"/10.5" works fine.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2010, 12:14 PM | #60 | |
Moderator
673
Rep 4,737
Posts |
Quote:
Also I read here that Hellride bent his front rims?? Anyone else bent their TRMotorsport rims?? http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=267498 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2010, 02:11 PM | #61 |
Major General
374
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Just because the tire can be fitted doesn't mean that is the optimal rim width for it. I ran 265/285 tires on 9.5"/10.5" rims. I wouldn't mount the same 265 tire on a 9" rim if I were you and had the choice of going for wider rims. At NHMS, I saw that Will Turner was running 275 Hoosiers on 10" front rims for instance, and I believe that is the setup they recommend for the 10" square setup they sell.
__________________
Last edited by lucid; 03-20-2010 at 02:16 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2010, 04:50 PM | #62 |
#thatsanicemovebro
202
Rep 3,920
Posts
Drives: E92 M3 LSB/Black 6MT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
|
Hey rldzhao, are you 100% hell-bent on running with no spacers? Or is it more of a "if I can find something without spacers I would prefer that" type of thing?
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2010, 12:54 AM | #63 |
Major General
892
Rep 9,032
Posts |
From what I've read, the D-Force are better wheels than the TR. There were a few people who bent them on Bimmerforums and one of the E46 M3 forums, some without going off track.
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2010, 01:20 AM | #64 |
Critical Care Anesthesiologist
481
Rep 8,828
Posts
Drives: SMB F83
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Have you look at Bridgestone ProDrive wheels?
__________________
kev { divinum est sedate dolorem }
"your friendly neighborhood critical care anesthesiologist" |
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2010, 02:03 PM | #66 | |
Moderator
673
Rep 4,737
Posts |
Quote:
I did, however, realize that the TRM MT-1 are gravity casted, and at such a low weight (<20 lb), not very confidence inspiring... Looks like I have to look into CCW custom so that I can get the exact width and offset I want... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|