BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > M3 vs....
 
Mporium BMW
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-27-2013, 12:39 AM   #23
FVM3
Major General
FVM3's Avatar
270
Rep
5,751
Posts

Drives: e92 m3, f30 328i
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1MOREMOD View Post
? not following. if they never show up at the track they cant win.
Not to start another VS thread but trust me, 2012- C63 handling will surprise you , its not just a regular C with bigger engine. But fun to drive? M3 FTW
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 12:48 AM   #24
Nate2046
Lieutenant
Nate2046's Avatar
16
Rep
421
Posts

Drives: '11 e92M
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indianapolis, In

iTrader: (2)

Goddamn, that thing is fast! Goddamn, that thing is ugly! If Merc can put that drivetrain in a C-class coupe and make it look a little better than a design that Hyundai would reject, they'd really have something. BMW would have to rethink keeping the M3/4 at the low 400 horsepower level.
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 01:10 AM   #25
FVM3
Major General
FVM3's Avatar
270
Rep
5,751
Posts

Drives: e92 m3, f30 328i
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate2046 View Post
Goddamn, that thing is fast! Goddamn, that thing is ugly! If Merc can put that drivetrain in a C-class coupe and make it look a little better than a design that Hyundai would reject, they'd really have something. BMW would have to rethink keeping the M3/4 at the low 400 horsepower level.
To me it looks better before facelift.
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 01:12 AM   #26
dreamspeed
Lieutenant Colonel
dreamspeed's Avatar
United_States
260
Rep
1,616
Posts

Drives: 6MT
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

I see AMGs more as a frenemy
__________________
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 01:59 AM   #27
gvega702
Private First Class
gvega702's Avatar
28
Rep
137
Posts

Drives: 2004 BMW 325i Premium | Sport
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Las Vegas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamspeed
I see AMGs more as a frenemy
Great answer
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 03:34 AM   #28
cwg
Captain
45
Rep
723
Posts

Drives: 2017 M4 ZCP. AZB on black
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kailua, HI

iTrader: (0)

e63 - isnt that more in line with the M5?
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 03:36 AM   #29
cwg
Captain
45
Rep
723
Posts

Drives: 2017 M4 ZCP. AZB on black
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kailua, HI

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DemolitionJim View Post
that aston martin ad.... i like it... a lot haha

very clever.
And so true
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 04:23 AM   #30
FVM3
Major General
FVM3's Avatar
270
Rep
5,751
Posts

Drives: e92 m3, f30 328i
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwg View Post
And so true
Once you know thats used, how many owners doesnt really matter but of course one owner is the best....lol
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 04:56 AM   #31
Ezio
Brigadier General
Ezio's Avatar
United_States
380
Rep
3,934
Posts

Drives: 2023 Alfa Romeo, 2023 m240i
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: MI

iTrader: (0)

To me i like a car that looks good,sounds good and performs. This car sounds good and seems to perform. But i dislike the looks, very boring looking.
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 05:13 AM   #32
MTrezzz
Major
MTrezzz's Avatar
United_States
198
Rep
1,406
Posts

Drives: Lime Rock Edition
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Long Island

iTrader: (1)

Not a fan of the looks
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 05:35 AM   #33
LarThaL
Colonel
LarThaL's Avatar
336
Rep
2,940
Posts

Drives: 2011 M3
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: West Springfield, MA

iTrader: (0)

1. Our "enemy" is the C63 AMG, not the E63. This car is enemy to the M5.

2. At this power level, I really think you need AWD, especially in a large front engine sedan with relatively narrow tires. That's where a car like this will hammer an M5. M5 simply can't put its power down effectively enough. I know RWD will still give you a more dynamic feel, but in these bloated, heavy power barges, what difference does it really make? People don't buy these cars to take them to the track. Even the vast majority of M5 owners will never track their cars.

3. I have never been a huge fan of MB looks. There are a few models that are nice, but their styling tends to look dated very fast. BMW designs are timeless. Even a nicely kept 12 year-old e46 M3 still looks hot.

4. Keep in mind, that we are splitting hairs here. At this overall caliber of car, no matter what you buy....S/RS cars, M cars, AMG cars.....they are all really pretty good.
__________________
Audi S6 * Audi S3 * Porsche Cayman GTS
--Former BMW M3 owner
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 06:18 AM   #34
FVM3
Major General
FVM3's Avatar
270
Rep
5,751
Posts

Drives: e92 m3, f30 328i
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by LarThaL View Post
1. Our "enemy" is the C63 AMG, not the E63. This car is enemy to the M5.

2. At this power level, I really think you need AWD, especially in a large front engine sedan with relatively narrow tires. That's where a car like this will hammer an M5. M5 simply can't put its power down effectively enough. I know RWD will still give you a more dynamic feel, but in these bloated, heavy power barges, what difference does it really make? People don't buy these cars to take them to the track. Even the vast majority of M5 owners will never track their cars.

3. I have never been a huge fan of MB looks. There are a few models that are nice, but their styling tends to look dated very fast. BMW designs are timeless. Even a nicely kept 12 year-old e46 M3 still looks hot.

4. Keep in mind, that we are splitting hairs here. At this overall caliber of car, no matter what you buy....S/RS cars, M cars, AMG cars.....they are all really pretty good.
BMW looks out dated to me, no offense im BMW fan. Mercedes always gets nicer interior to me. Mercedes makes a totally different interior even just a facelift.
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 08:08 AM   #35
flanast
First Lieutenant
flanast's Avatar
United_States
149
Rep
373
Posts

Drives: e92 M3
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by robotk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Endless619 View Post
Car still looks like shit.
Agree - the car looks terrible, it has an automatic and it's a Mercedes. I just can't make myself care.
+1
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 08:35 AM   #36
DMW2315
******
73
Rep
290
Posts

Drives: G82 M4 | E46 M3 | E39 540i
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamspeed View Post
I see AMGs more as a frenemy
Like an enemy of your enemy is your friend?
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 08:37 AM   #37
DMW2315
******
73
Rep
290
Posts

Drives: G82 M4 | E46 M3 | E39 540i
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

I'd like to take a vote to see who in here has actually flogged (and I don't mean just a quick spin down a side street) a recent C63 / E63. For those who have not, I think you guys need to before you make any judement against an AMG.
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 08:42 AM   #38
tjsabec
Captain
tjsabec's Avatar
United_States
53
Rep
620
Posts

Drives: 2008, e90, alpine white, 6mt
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Morgantown, wv

iTrader: (2)

Car and Driver estimated base price $95,000 and estimated weight 4350 lbs... Looks like it'd compete poorly with the M5 to me.
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 08:49 AM   #39
tjsabec
Captain
tjsabec's Avatar
United_States
53
Rep
620
Posts

Drives: 2008, e90, alpine white, 6mt
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Morgantown, wv

iTrader: (2)

How is this thing: AMG SpeedShift MCT

Mercedes-AMG developed the 7-speed MCT "Multi Clutch Technology" planetary semi-automatic transmission.
The MCT transmission is essentially the 7G-Tronic automatic transmission without a torque converter. Instead of a torque converter, it uses a compact wet startup clutch to launch the car from a stop, and also supports computer-controlled double declutching. The MCT (Multi-Clutch Technology) acronym refers to a planetary (automatic) transmission’s multiple clutches and bands for each gear.


It seems uninspiring to me.
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 09:03 AM   #40
Majin Buu
Banned
15
Rep
324
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by LarThaL View Post

2. At this power level, I really think you need AWD, especially in a large front engine sedan with relatively narrow tires. That's where a car like this will hammer an M5. M5 simply can't put its power down effectively enough. I know RWD will still give you a more dynamic feel, but in these bloated, heavy power barges, what difference does it really make? People don't buy these cars to take them to the track. Even the vast majority of M5 owners will never track their cars.
That's what I will never understand. Last time I checked, the speed limit hasn't been increased. And there are no autobahns outside Germany. So if you don't go to the track, why buy those gazillion horsepower sedans? You pay more MSRP, gas guzzler tax, maintenance, insurance, and fuel costs, for what? So that you can win the Stop Light Grand Prix?
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 09:04 AM   #41
w00tw00t
Colonel
w00tw00t's Avatar
United_States
408
Rep
2,171
Posts

Drives: 2016 MW M4
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Jose, CA

iTrader: (13)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin Buu View Post
That's what I will never understand. Last time I checked, the speed limit hasn't been increased. And there are no autobahns outside Germany. So if you don't go to the track, why buy those gazillion horsepower sedans? You pay more MSRP, gas guzzler tax, maintenance, insurance, and fuel costs, for what? So that you can win the Stop Light Grand Prix?
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 09:15 AM   #42
Jcblue
Private
6
Rep
59
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW m3 frozen blue
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Miami

iTrader: (0)

Guys I had a 12' c63 and jumped into my new m3 ,terms of power the c63 was a beast....but driving experience,transmission and handling m3 all day...and am not even going into the looks dept....this e63 is just faster off the line but top end it won't beat the m5 specially if you buy the new competition pckg on the m5
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 09:21 AM   #43
bruce.augenstein@comcast.
Colonel
99
Rep
2,000
Posts

Drives: 2017 C63
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manheim, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjsabec View Post
Car and Driver estimated base price $95,000 and estimated weight 4350 lbs... Looks like it'd compete poorly with the M5 to me.
Since the current E63 has already beaten up on the M5 in the pages of Car & Driver, it's very possible this new one will do even better, especially given the early reports on handling.

We'll see, though.

Bruce
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2013, 10:40 AM   #44
Blindside_137
Lieutenant General
Blindside_137's Avatar
United_States
6696
Rep
10,596
Posts

Drives: 2011.75 SSII E90 M3 ZCP
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC

iTrader: (2)

good god that car looks butt ugly
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST