|
|
12-13-2011, 09:34 PM | #1 |
Private
8
Rep 51
Posts |
E9X - Start Stop or Taller 7th Gear (DCT)
I was wondering if BMW should have used a taller 7th gear (DCT) instead of the start stop feature for better fuel economy.
Higher RPM's = Higher fuel consumption |
12-13-2011, 09:53 PM | #2 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
307
Rep 13,093
Posts
Drives: BPMsport 2012 E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kansas
iTrader: (45)
Garage List 2013 Nissan GTR [0.00]
2019 Sierra Denali ... [0.00] 1999 Nissan Silvia [0.00] 1999 Nissan Skyline ... [0.00] 1998 Toyota Supra [0.00] |
I think the start/stop was just done to pass whatever certifications were needed for the new model years. Anything that isn't automatically on isn't very productive.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2011, 08:46 AM | #3 | ||
Moderator
7512
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
An 8 speed DCT might be part of the answer - those will probably be here sometime later this decade if DCT tech is not killed off in favor of a traditional planetary gearbox. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2011, 08:55 AM | #5 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
307
Rep 13,093
Posts
Drives: BPMsport 2012 E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kansas
iTrader: (45)
Garage List 2013 Nissan GTR [0.00]
2019 Sierra Denali ... [0.00] 1999 Nissan Silvia [0.00] 1999 Nissan Skyline ... [0.00] 1998 Toyota Supra [0.00] |
A different axle gear would change things as well.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2011, 09:09 AM | #6 |
Moderator
7512
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Popular opinion seems to be to keep the car at or above 2000 RPM to avoid bogging. But this is probably based more on maintaining non-stressed feedback from the car rather than how efficient it is operating.
Also, of course, there are only a couple reasonable cruising gears to select from at any given speed. So, to some degree, speed limits and traffic are going to decide the RPM of the engine for you. But there are still some choices. For example, in a 45mph zone, I might go 48 or 49 mph, and I would tend to choose 7th gear at about 1900 RPM (or whatever the exact RPM works out to be). Some people, however, might feel 7th is too stressed at that speed and choose 6th (some people only use 7th on the expressway, for that matter). Which gear is more efficient at that speed? I don't know. I suspect it is 7th but have no evidence for that. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2011, 09:14 AM | #7 |
Moderator
7512
Rep 19,368
Posts |
As an aside, I do recall folks reporting that they got better gas mileage while using S mode than D mode. I don't remember the details (like which Drivelogic settings they were using, for example), but it suggests that the computer logic for D might not be as good as a human can achieve. Whether the driver was choosing a higher gear, a lower gear, or some of each vs. what the D mode would have chosen - I don't know.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2011, 10:54 AM | #9 |
Brigadier General
594
Rep 4,488
Posts |
I'm guessing it was cheaper and easier for them to implement Auto Start/Stop (which they already had on lots of other cars around the world) since it's an almost purely software tweak with just a heavier duty battery and starter motor. Changing transmissions would have been added engineering, build changes, and then more parts to stock, and it probably would have annoyed more owners of earlier DCT cars too. And Auto Start/Stop gives any mileage improvement to 6MT drivers as well.
__________________
'16 Cayman GT4 (delivery pics, comparison to E92 M3 write-up)
Gone but not forgotten: '11.75 M3 E92 Le Mans | Black Nov w/ Alum | 6MT (owned 5/2011 - 11/2015) |
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2011, 12:22 PM | #10 |
that's what SHE said!
75
Rep 1,163
Posts |
That would change the gearing for all gears though
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2011, 03:18 PM | #11 |
Major General
1570
Rep 8,075
Posts
Drives: 11 E90 M3 Individual
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
I believe the new EPA tests take Start/Stop into account so cars with this feature will show an improvement in MPG.
I don't think a taller gear will help with highway MPG. The issue becomes aero which is usually optimized around 60mph. If we all really wanted to improve MPGs...eliminate ethanol in fuel.
__________________
2018 F30 320iX Melbourne Red
2011 E90 M3 Monte Carlo Blue 2004 E46 M3 Imola Red 2000 E36/7 Z3 Steel Blue |
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2011, 04:44 PM | #12 | |
Banned
88
Rep 1,105
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2011, 06:33 PM | #13 | |
Major General
1570
Rep 8,075
Posts
Drives: 11 E90 M3 Individual
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
I have considered this for my 330 6sp. I want to run a shorter rear and replace my 6th gear with a taller gear. So I get some extra low end grunt without screaming down the highway at 4000rpms or so. I like the option of start/stop, although its mostly useless where I am at. I would like the option to shut off 4 cylinders to save some fuel...wonder what the MPG gain would be?
__________________
2018 F30 320iX Melbourne Red
2011 E90 M3 Monte Carlo Blue 2004 E46 M3 Imola Red 2000 E36/7 Z3 Steel Blue |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2011, 09:11 PM | #14 |
Banned
88
Rep 1,105
Posts |
Some of the new chargers have that feature and it does not seem to bring down the mpg as much as I would have thought.
I don't know I really don't give a shit about mpg so I could care less. I would not be in an m3, which arguably is the worst mpg car available today save a lambo. Even a ferrari is getting similar mileage. WIth that said, I had a 6 cylinder bmw for 4 years and averaged 15.9 mpg averaged over 4 years with mostly city and some highway driving. That is worse than I have gotten in my m3 so far but I drive in less stop and go. If you drive the 6 cylinders hard than they suck at milage too. Really about how you drive it and if you lay off the accelerator than you get much better mpg, however what is the point? I redline it and hang out in 6k rpms and above almost 90 percent of the time so the powerband is instantly right there I did this on my 6 cylinder (went up to 7k rpms) and constantly rode the redline and the engine was as clean as a whistle! They did a completely cylinder head swap at 49k and the thing was spotless the techs said! |
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2011, 06:05 AM | #15 | |
Major General
1570
Rep 8,075
Posts
Drives: 11 E90 M3 Individual
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
That's the one area where the Vette and Caymna/Boxter have the M3 beat.
__________________
2018 F30 320iX Melbourne Red
2011 E90 M3 Monte Carlo Blue 2004 E46 M3 Imola Red 2000 E36/7 Z3 Steel Blue |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2011, 09:12 AM | #16 | |
Moderator
7512
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
If you disbelieve, put the car in a gear that yields very low engine RPM, set your cruise, and drive up a freeway onramp. The car will apply plenty of throttle, yet there will be no change in speed (no acceleration). Now, if you chosen a low enough RPM, prepare to experience *major* bogging. That's one quick example off the top of my head. There are others that will give a similar experience. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2011, 09:16 AM | #17 | |
Major
123
Rep 1,432
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2011, 09:21 AM | #18 | |
Major
123
Rep 1,432
Posts |
Quote:
The M3 is an all-round sports car, but if you try to make it TOO 'well-rounded', you will end up with a vehicle that is not really good at anything (much like the X6M). |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2011, 09:22 AM | #19 |
Captain of the Enterprise
101
Rep 1,424
Posts |
Between 8,000 and 8,300 RPM, of course.
.
__________________
2011 1 Series M Coupe VO M3 vs 1M Comparo Review 2011 M3 E90 DCT ZCP (sold) * 2010 335i Sedan (sold) 2005 M3 Convertible (sold) * 2003 325i Sedan (sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2011, 09:41 AM | #20 |
Happy Camper
612
Rep 7,869
Posts
Drives: C63 AMG & 280 SL on Weekends :
Join Date: May 2010
Location: GTA, Ontario - Canada
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1969 Restored Merce ... [7.50]
2011 M3 Coupe TRADED [7.34] 1987 BMW 535is [1.00] Cars from the Past [6.50] The ///M3 Engine S65 [9.59] |
I run at 2,900 to 3,200 when cruising (just about 10% above posted speed limits - overtaking 18 wheelers etc). Milage under those driving conditions is around 10.8L/100 KM to 11.2L/100 KM on my car
__________________
Cheers, Rolf-Dieter
Life will take us to some interesting places, fortunately The ///M3 will too with a many of us know this very well, now my C6.3 AMG with 487 HP does it too ---> Click here for some good stuff I found |
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2011, 09:42 AM | #21 |
Happy Camper
612
Rep 7,869
Posts
Drives: C63 AMG & 280 SL on Weekends :
Join Date: May 2010
Location: GTA, Ontario - Canada
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1969 Restored Merce ... [7.50]
2011 M3 Coupe TRADED [7.34] 1987 BMW 535is [1.00] Cars from the Past [6.50] The ///M3 Engine S65 [9.59] |
you are quoting the enterprise cooling system here yes
__________________
Cheers, Rolf-Dieter
Life will take us to some interesting places, fortunately The ///M3 will too with a many of us know this very well, now my C6.3 AMG with 487 HP does it too ---> Click here for some good stuff I found |
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2011, 09:44 AM | #22 | |
Moderator
7512
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
Or just on the expressway where the minimum achievable RPM is dictated directly by your speed? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|