|
|
07-23-2011, 01:03 AM | #24 | |
Brigadier General
1454
Rep 3,928
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2011, 11:43 AM | #25 |
Veni Vidi Vici
89
Rep 2,750
Posts
Drives: '11 JB/BBe-6sp-e90
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Macungie PA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2011 e90 M3-Sold [8.50]
2003 RS6 - Sold [0.00] 2009 e90 M3 - Gone [0.00] 2003 M3 SOLD [0.00] old 2002 [10.00] |
$90k +/- $5k
__________________
Dinan compliment of stuff plus PF rotors and RG63s. Enough for now. Why, yes. I am an abrasive bastard. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2011, 10:35 PM | #27 |
Colonel
248
Rep 2,513
Posts |
Its engine doesnt rev that high, and from reviews so far, i heard it is way more quiet than S65.
So i will keep my m3
__________________
AW|FR 6MT E92 ///M3 |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2011, 10:47 PM | #28 | |
4 Star General -Twilight Zone
36
Rep 1,032
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
'12 Ducati Diavel
'06 E46 M3 (sold) | '97 325is - Dinan (sold) '02 Z3 3.0 coupe (sold) Past - '84 Ferrari 308 GTSI | '88 Ferrari 328 GTS | '05 Dodge Viper Copperhead Edition #180/300 | Audi S4 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2011, 11:21 PM | #29 | |
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep 264
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2011, 03:45 AM | #33 |
Captain
48
Rep 636
Posts |
Back in 2003, I traded in my 2002 E46 M3 for an E39 M5. I kept the M5 for 3K miles and sold it. Bought another M3. The M5 is nice but the size did me in. It just wasn't as much fun to drive as the M3. The M5 was a great cruiser car but it never really put a grin on my face. The M3 was fun and always kept a smile on my face. At 4200+ pounds, the F10 M5 will be fast, but will never be as much fun as an M3. Driving a car needs to be fun. It's tough to beat the fun-factor of an M3 plus still have a trunk and room for 3 friends.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2011, 07:32 AM | #34 |
Major
269
Rep 1,282
Posts |
It's clearly a different tool. The E60 is a lot faster in a straight line than the E9X M, and the E9X carves it up in corners while the M5 tires howl for mercy. Nonotheless, the M5 is pretty darned respectable for it weight. The E60 is more of a luxury car than the E9X.
I picked up an E60 because my two 6-foot sons needed the space in back and I wanted an M. The F10 looks like an even better version (except of course for the V10 vs. turbo thread that's been flogged to death) performance wise, and I'm sure it will be quite comfortable. It's just a different tool.
__________________
M850i Vert with RaceChip
E46 M3, Euro Headers, Rasp Pipe, Kassel Tune Alpina B8, zero performance mods |
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2011, 08:04 AM | #35 |
Major
269
Rep 1,282
Posts |
Oh, yeah, I picked up a loaded 2008 6MT E60 M5 with 24K miles for $52K. I plan to wait for an off lease F10 M5 and do it again.
__________________
M850i Vert with RaceChip
E46 M3, Euro Headers, Rasp Pipe, Kassel Tune Alpina B8, zero performance mods |
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2011, 08:22 AM | #36 |
Second Lieutenant
12
Rep 294
Posts
Drives: 2010 CTS-V sedan, black raven
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hainesport, New Jersey
|
+1,
As far as performance, for those of you that use the Nurburgring as the yardstick, the F10 M5 ran it unofficially at 7:55! Agree with what someone said earlier, will wait to judge after I drive it...
__________________
Current rides: 2010 CTS-V sedan, black raven; 2010 Cadillac Escalade ESV, black raven
Gone but not forgotten: 2008 M5, metallic sapphire black, SMG; 2004 645ci, metallic sapphire black, SMG |
Appreciate
0
|
07-25-2011, 12:18 AM | #37 |
Major
32
Rep 999
Posts |
Going from a s85 to a s63 turbo is just not doable for me. I don't care how much more faster the f10 is, it just doesn't make sense to give up the s85....unless you care about gas. But if you own a ///m car, then gas mileage should not be the number one priority. lol.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-25-2011, 02:44 AM | #38 |
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep 264
Posts |
Only 4 seconds faster than the CTS-V? Was I hoping for too much?
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-25-2011, 08:45 AM | #39 |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
514
Rep 1,437
Posts |
Will definitely be on my short list as well. Cant wait to drive one. Im sure it will come with as many smiles as an M3. Those of you who are too respectful of the naturally aspirated motors to even dare think of driving a turbochargerd car. Really?
If you need the 4 doors and the room but still want to drive an M, and can afford the ticket, why wouldnt you get one???
__________________
2022 Individual M5 Comp
Venetian Violet 2021 X6M Comp 2024 i4 M50 on order IG @purpleM5Comp_NY |
Appreciate
0
|
07-25-2011, 11:47 AM | #41 |
Captain of the Enterprise
101
Rep 1,424
Posts |
M5 drivers value different things than M3 drivers.
I'm prone more to go smaller and lighter for the handling.
__________________
2011 1 Series M Coupe VO M3 vs 1M Comparo Review 2011 M3 E90 DCT ZCP (sold) * 2010 335i Sedan (sold) 2005 M3 Convertible (sold) * 2003 325i Sedan (sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
07-25-2011, 04:15 PM | #42 |
Major
367
Rep 1,202
Posts |
Definitely considered it. I've always wanted an M5 (the E39 M5 is what got me into the "M" Brand).
It's a financial thing for me. Spending $100K + on a car is not feasible in the short term. I'd love to have one though. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-25-2011, 04:28 PM | #43 |
Been There, Done That.
648
Rep 4,728
Posts |
I don't think I'd own an M5. I'd jump into a Panamera turbo or a 911. Will have to wait and see it before I make any judgments.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|