|
|
07-07-2011, 02:11 AM | #1 |
Major General
273
Rep 5,751
Posts |
Why is E9x m3 heavier than e46 m3?
The S65 is 15kg lighter than the L6 engine in the E46 m3, so where does the extra weight go to?
Last edited by FVM3; 07-07-2011 at 01:19 PM.. |
07-07-2011, 02:39 AM | #3 | |
Troll
79
Rep 1,193
Posts |
Not this shit again...
__________________
BMW E92 M3 Coupe | Jerez Black | Fox Red Extended / Carbon Black Trim| Fully Loaded | Moonroof | 6MT | Gintani Sport Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 03:28 AM | #5 |
Lieutenant Colonel
353
Rep 1,749
Posts |
its bigger and more complex so its heavier. you can use more light-weight materials but this adds cost.
__________________
"It gave you amazing satisfaction, but anyone who says he loved it is either a liar or he wasn't going fast enough." - Jackie Stewart on racing at the Nurburgring
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 05:24 AM | #6 |
Lieutenant
30
Rep 409
Posts |
All your creature comfort equipment, and larger size as previously stated.
__________________
09'M3 JerezB/Tech/Cold/Prem/PDC/SR/Black Leather/ANTHRACITE Sycamore/IPOD/USB/Rear Sunshade/Premium Sounnd/6MT***Just Hit The Ground! Delivery 02/25/2009***
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 06:34 AM | #7 |
Colonel
167
Rep 2,736
Posts
Drives: 2008 E92 ///M3 Alpine White
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoFla - Bonita Springs
|
It's "than" not "then".
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 07:56 AM | #8 |
Major
119
Rep 1,497
Posts |
Because-its suspension/chassis is stronger in every sense of the way. Anybody remember the E46 M3 Subframe fiasco???
See link and hopefully this is a complete answer to your question-http://blogs.insideline.com/roadtest...alkaround.html BMW learned from their mistake with the E46-hence the added strength around the rear subframe. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 09:50 AM | #14 |
Brigadier General
2350
Rep 4,253
Posts |
I also was wondering what the specific contrast was. But I assumed much of the same; stronger subframe requiring more material, heavier seats (correct me if I'm wrong), increased bumper weight from safety requirements, increased number of sensors and diagnostic electronics, heavier shifter linkage and driveshaft, heavier exhaust, improve climate control including automatic filtering sensors for the HEPA system.. anything else that's significant?
__________________
///M Power
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 10:13 AM | #15 |
Brigadier General
199
Rep 4,318
Posts |
Can't believe nobody has mentioned this before - because ITS A BIGGER CAR...
E46 / E92 WheelBase 2731 mm / 2761 Length 4492 mm / 4615 Height 1372 mm / 1418 Width 1780 mm / 1817
__________________
GT3 RS | Desperately seeking the next great M car...
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 12:27 PM | #16 |
Lieutenant
19
Rep 562
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Sedan SSII/SN/DCT
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Keep in mind all cars are far heavier now than they were. Most of that is due to saftey standards, some of it is due to increased wheelbase (length and width), more tech toys, computers and the associated wiring, sound insulation, air bag modules, etc.
But expect to see some trending to lighter cars with the introduction of carbon plastics which have the strength of steel, lightness of plastic, and can actually be easily repaired unlike carbon fiber. Also expect more aluminum construction.
__________________
08 GT500 convertible red package (Black w/ Red stripes) /Ford Racing Exhaust /Cold Air Induction 560hp
10 Porsche Cayenne GTS Black w/ Black Wheels 408hp 11 M3 Silverstone w/ Silver Novillo Leather /Tech /Premium /19" /DCT /Ipod 414hp |
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 12:34 PM | #17 |
Colonel
1558
Rep 2,505
Posts |
Reinforced subframe since the e46's had a class action lawsuit against them.
__________________
2019 M2 Competition- October 2, 2018 ED
2011 BMW M3 Sedan Alpine White Picked up via ED 9/27/2011 & Redelivered 11/23/2011 **SOLD** |
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 12:48 PM | #18 |
///M
158
Rep 3,195
Posts |
ur pic has an idrive controller, did u also get other luxury items? is the E9x bigger in size than the e4x? this is like a rhetorical question.
__________________
2011.5 AW/FR E92 M3 6MT
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 12:51 PM | #19 |
Lieutenant Colonel
171
Rep 1,530
Posts |
Guys, I'm not the most tech savvy guy here but whenever E9x weight issue comes up (too frequently I say) I always wonder, why do you mostly look at the weight as opposed to
Track records Power/wt ratio Overall performance Usain Bolt is heavier than Florence Griffith-Joyner but faster. E9x is heavier than E36 but faster, so what's the big deal. Why would you compare the weight of a V8 to a V6 to start with? Would any of you complain if BMW gave us a new M3 that is 100lb heavier than E92 but V10 and 600HP?? I don't get it I understand that you would want to have the same car lighter to extract more power/wt and end up with faster time but then where does it end, remove all seats but driver’s, don’t order EDC, NAV, AC, power seat, etc but how many of us on that forum would buy such a car? Go drive a Lotus if that’s what you’re looking for.
__________________
2011 E92 JB/BL/DCT--->80K Miles
2015 F80 SS/SO/DCT?->28K Miles 2015 Porsche 911S |
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 01:21 PM | #20 |
Major General
273
Rep 5,751
Posts |
I dont mind the weight of the e9x m3 but there was a thread earlier about "what you dont like about your car" and most of the members said the weight of the car. I never driven an e46 so i dont think e9x is heavy, especially my previous ride was 2000 kg.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2011, 01:29 PM | #22 | |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2011 MINI Cooper S
previous cars: E92 M3, Z4MC, Z4 Roadster, E36 328 Sedan |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|