Well shit me a golden egg and call me Shirley, Acura puts a V6 in the TSX

hks786 · 02-12-2009, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bimmer Loyalist

shuckin fit ugly

Lol +1

I think the Accord actually looks a lot better especially with the different grille.

Ender514 · 02-12-2009, 05:28 AM

i dont get this move from acura. the tsx is already pretty expensive for a 4cyl...so i can imagine the price point will go up with the V6....putting it closer to the TL.

the first gen is still the best looking and it should have been the new accord here....like in europe.

and why doesnt acura concentrate on making a sports coupe instead??

OBI_agent · 02-12-2009, 06:57 AM

I like the engine....not sure about the body!

number335 · 02-13-2009, 02:01 AM

I've seen a few on the road and I think it's an improvement over the 1st generation. It looks sportier and seems to have a wider stance. With a V6 and bigger rims, I would consider it if I was in the market for a luxury sedan near the 30k range.

wj4 · 02-13-2009, 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ender514

i dont get this move from acura. the tsx is already pretty expensive for a 4cyl...so i can imagine the price point will go up with the V6....putting it closer to the TL.

the first gen is still the best looking and it should have been the new accord here....like in europe.

and why doesnt acura concentrate on making a sports coupe instead??

And I'd like to add that the new TL is quite pricey! And the car is just weird looking, not to mention long.

wj4 · 02-13-2009, 04:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by number335

I've seen a few on the road and I think it's an improvement over the 1st generation. It looks sportier and seems to have a wider stance. With a V6 and bigger rims, I would consider it if I was in the market for a luxury sedan near the 30k range.

I think it's going to be more than that now. A new V6 Accord fully loaded will be in the sub 30k mark.

EVO_S4 · 02-13-2009, 09:03 AM

they should have put the 2.4 turbo engine from the RDX, and it would have been a big hit from those guys on honda-tech

canucklion · 02-13-2009, 09:13 AM

this does look better than the TL, but the 1st gen TSX still looks better than this. The grilles on the new TSX and TL are hideious.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seminole

Especially when this looks MUCH better than the TL, IMO.

canucklion · 02-13-2009, 09:14 AM

+1

Quote:

Originally Posted by EVO_S4

they should have put the 2.4 turbo engine from the RDX, and it would have been a big hit from those guys on honda-tech

OBI_agent · 02-13-2009, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EVO_S4

they should have put the 2.4 turbo engine from the RDX, and it would have been a big hit from those guys on honda-tech

+2...May I add the SH-AWD as I hate the torque steer from a FWD car.And that engine has alot of potential (Ahem, chip

)

But a 3.5 V6 280hp aint bad at all

.....I just cant get over the design though

BMW F22 · 02-13-2009, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BForbes

They didnt do enough. I am not impressed. It is a step in the right direction though. It needed SH-AWD, LSD, and a 6MT option. I guess there is always hope for the Type S. It should debut after the TL-type S.

Actually it doesn't need any of those things you just mentioned. Look at the 3 series (which I know is considered the best thing since slice bread for some of the fanboys on here), it doesn't have LSD and people still flock to buy it. The majority of cars sold are RWD with auto. But IMO even if the TSX did come with all those features you mentioned, some on here would say things like "it's still an Acura."

blue2fire · 02-26-2009, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenix

This is a sidestepping correction to a problem Acura made for themselves with the new TSX. Instead of giving it more power, they should have made the car lighter and more nimble with a small boost in power. 100lbs off the first gen TSX and an extra 20whp would have suited the market much better than this big V6 sedan.

Like the new Mazda 2?

bulldog_yyc · 03-01-2009, 10:58 PM

looks like a cheese slicer

02-12-2009, 05:28 AM	#24
Ender514 General 228 Rep 20,998 Posts Drives: 2009 E92 335i Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Philly iTrader: (0)	i dont get this move from acura. the tsx is already pretty expensive for a 4cyl...so i can imagine the price point will go up with the V6....putting it closer to the TL. the first gen is still the best looking and it should have been the new accord here....like in europe. and why doesnt acura concentrate on making a sports coupe instead??
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-12-2009, 06:57 AM	#25
OBI_agent D to the X to the B! 345 Rep 2,106 Posts Drives: ABS,American bargain supercar Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Dubai iTrader: (0)	I like the engine....not sure about the body! __________________ 11 corvette C6
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-13-2009, 02:01 AM	#26
number335 Second Lieutenant 20 Rep 254 Posts Drives: E92 Coupe Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Orange County, CA iTrader: (0)	I've seen a few on the road and I think it's an improvement over the 1st generation. It looks sportier and seems to have a wider stance. With a V6 and bigger rims, I would consider it if I was in the market for a luxury sedan near the 30k range.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-13-2009, 09:03 AM	#29
EVO_S4 Colonel 117 Rep 2,232 Posts Drives: 2016 M3 Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: TN iTrader: (28) Garage List 2016 BMW M3 [0.00] 2009 BMW [8.24]	they should have put the 2.4 turbo engine from the RDX, and it would have been a big hit from those guys on honda-tech __________________ 2016 M3 2016 Audi Q5 3.0T
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-01-2009, 10:58 PM	#35
bulldog_yyc Major General 130 Rep 5,040 Posts Drives: GT3RS Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: probably work iTrader: (28)	looks like a cheese slicer
	Appreciate 0 Quote