|
|
03-06-2008, 06:56 PM | #67 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 127
Posts
Drives: S2 Dinan 335i
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston
|
M!!!
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2008, 06:59 PM | #68 |
Colonel
236
Rep 2,366
Posts
Drives: 1 M Coupe
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Diego
|
i would wait till the cars have been out for a bit, at this rate getting an m3 will take a few months on its own so id just be patient and lets see what problems or issues come about on the US version. I think in this case the M3 but based on the reviews im getting very questionable.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2008, 07:03 PM | #69 |
Major General
2158
Rep 5,623
Posts |
at first i didn't like the c63. but eventually the interior and the standard features list got to me. but i will say this m3 sedan<c63 but m3 coupe>c63. although you are getting a 6.2l with the 63 it is an automatic, nothing wrong with that but the m3 has manual and the new godlike 7 speed ksg .
the driving feeling of the amg and ms are way different to. the m always feel driver oriented making the driver really have feel for the car. the benz on the other hand is just a bullet. push the pedal and your out. nothing really special to the drive to it. this is from riding and driving m coupe, m3, m5, c55, clk55, sl55, e63, and a slk55. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2008, 07:31 PM | #70 |
Private First Class
2
Rep 117
Posts |
The C63 reminds me of a baby elephant that has too much power for its own good and doesn't have the means to put it all to works. E92 M3 for me.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2008, 08:21 PM | #71 |
Lieutenant General
1137
Rep 12,444
Posts |
I would honestly need to drive the two back to back for a good hour each before I made up my mind.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2008, 08:36 PM | #72 |
Captain
59
Rep 627
Posts |
Neither cars are light. I have to agree, if you wanted a "light" car try an E30 or some company called "low-tus". |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|