|
|
|
KEEP M3POST ALIVE BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER LINK! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
10-23-2012, 12:15 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant Colonel
776
Rep 1,718
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Jet Black:ZCP, ZCV, ZP
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Atlanta, Ga
|
Pilot super sports camber range
So I am about to get a new alignment for my E92 M3 with GC Camber plates. I run PSS on the street and conti slicks on the track. I am not wanting to have to adjust my camber plates at the track. So I have been running f:-2.5 and r:-2, I am thinking I need more camber for my slicks but I am worried that running f:-3 r:-2~-2.5 that the PSS will wear to quickly on the street. Thoughts?
Adam
__________________
|
10-23-2012, 12:30 PM | #2 | |
Major
59
Rep 1,250
Posts |
Quote:
-2.5/-2.0 is a closer compromise setup than -3/-2.5. And I'm surprised the slicks need more than -2 rear camber, I ran -2.2 on a racecar in the rear with slicks and it worked well. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-23-2012, 12:43 PM | #3 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
776
Rep 1,718
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Jet Black:ZCP, ZCV, ZP
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Atlanta, Ga
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
10-23-2012, 04:48 PM | #4 |
M3Post Supporting Vendor
87
Rep 964
Posts |
-3 would be more ideal for the track, but will definitely give you premature wear on the inside shoulders during street use unless you're really cornering like a madman on the street.
So which do you want to compromise? Wear on your street tires, performance of your track tires, or convenience?
__________________
_______________________________________________
I have accepted a new position at Tire Rack and am no longer in the sales department. gary@tirerack.com is available to assist with M3 questions. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-23-2012, 06:10 PM | #5 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
776
Rep 1,718
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 Jet Black:ZCP, ZCV, ZP
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Atlanta, Ga
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-24-2012, 07:23 AM | #6 | |
M3Post Supporting Vendor
87
Rep 964
Posts |
Quote:
The harder you drive on the street, the more negative camber you should dial in. If your street driving is mostly just relaxed cruising, then you would want minimal camber.
__________________
_______________________________________________
I have accepted a new position at Tire Rack and am no longer in the sales department. gary@tirerack.com is available to assist with M3 questions. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2012, 11:52 AM | #7 |
Shosholoza
31
Rep 188
Posts |
I have the GC adjustable camber plates and run -1.5f for the street and -2.3f for the track.
Adjusting at the track takes 5 minutes per wheel. I had -1.5, -2.3, and -3.0 marked on the camber plates when the shop did the alignment. The more negative the camber, the more toe out is. Its neutral at -1.5. Even at -3 its not enough to create any straight line instability, but it does wear the inside of the tires more. Turn in is great! Thats why i use -2.3 great turn in and less inside wear. outside wear is no longer an issue.
__________________
SOLD...E92 M3, Competition Package, MDCT, Ground Control Adjustable Camber plates, StopTech 380 BBK, OEM exhaust mod
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2012, 05:23 PM | #8 |
Private First Class
11
Rep 124
Posts |
I have 18" PSS for the street and I run 2.2 and 1.8. I am very pleased with this setup.
You need more negative camber for R Comps or slicks so I would advise 2 different setups. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|