BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-29-2013, 08:36 PM   #1
M3amigos
HP addict
M3amigos's Avatar
United_States
37
Rep
321
Posts

Drives: 2008 Jerez Black E93 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Orlando, FL

iTrader: (0)

Has anyone just cut out the stock cats and replaced them with straight pipe or resonators. Performance-wise, how would this compare to the other catless x-pipes out there? Are there any disadvantages, is the stock piping diameter less than optimal? Would the sound be similar to stock if two or four resonators were added in addition to the oem resonators, or still quite raspy?
__________________
2008 Jerez Black Metallic E93 6MT
K&N Drop In Filter | HPA Pulley | Custom Catless Resonated X-Pipe | BPM Stage II Tune | Megan Racing Exhaust
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2013, 08:47 AM   #2
THE TECH
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
THE TECH's Avatar
307
Rep
13,093
Posts


Drives: BPMsport 2012 E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kansas

iTrader: (45)

Garage List
Yes, it's been done. Performance should be very similar to an aftermarket x-pipe. Adding resonators will always decrease rasp.
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2013, 10:59 AM   #3
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5228
Rep
10,611
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

Vishnu got 13 rwhp and 28 lbs rwtq from deleting the cats on a stock x-pipe, with no changes to the tune and no water/meth.

http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthr...hop+cat+delete

I think test pipes alone have been tested to show greater horsepower gains, but do not have links at hand to those dynos.
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2013, 02:59 PM   #4
M3amigos
HP addict
M3amigos's Avatar
United_States
37
Rep
321
Posts

Drives: 2008 Jerez Black E93 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Orlando, FL

iTrader: (0)

Does anyone know the lengths of the stock primary and secondary cats? What resonators are commonly used, are some better than others?
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2013, 03:02 PM   #5
gatorfast
Major General
gatorfast's Avatar
United_States
4995
Rep
6,862
Posts

Drives: 718 Cayman
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoFla

iTrader: (4)

Just swing by a local exhaust shop and speak with them about your options.
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2013, 03:02 PM   #6
BPMSport
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
BPMSport's Avatar
United_States
3387
Rep
7,541
Posts


Drives: Harrop M3 / F10 M5 / F82 M4
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (9)

Garage List
2000 BMW M5  [0.00]
1990 BMW 735i Turbo  [0.00]
2008 BMW M3  [7.50]
2015 BMW M3  [0.00]
2015 BMW M5  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb
Vishnu got 13 rwhp and 28 lbs rwtq from deleting the cats on a stock x-pipe, with no changes to the tune and no water/meth.

http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthr...hop+cat+delete

I think test pipes alone have been tested to show greater horsepower gains, but do not have links at hand to those dynos.
Wow that's a lot of torque.

Seems way above average.
__________________

-----| Like us on Facebook | Instagram || Tuning Information | Remote Coding |-----
----Visit us at www.BPMSport.com - Emotion. Driven. | Toll Free: (888) 557-5133----
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST