BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Wash, Wax, Detail, Cosmetic Maintenance & Repairs
 
Steve Thomas BMW
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      05-22-2013, 08:05 AM   #23
CSanto
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Drives: 2009 E92 M3
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York

Posts: 1,785
iTrader: (1)

How would you compare FG400 with Megs D300?

Similarly D301 to the Sonax Nano Polish?

I'm looking to bring some depth back into my paint, I currently only own the Meg twins.
CSanto is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      05-22-2013, 09:15 AM   #24
DetailersDomain
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor

 
DetailersDomain's Avatar
 
Drives: FJ Cruiser
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East Coast

Posts: 3,579
iTrader: (22)

I like the FG400 better than the D300, the FG400 will finish down much better.

The Sonax I also feel is better it will dust less and does not have filler properties.
DetailersDomain is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST