C63 AMG

hks786 · 07-10-2007, 07:17 AM

"We won’t see the C63 on these shores until next spring, and prices haven’t been set. We can’t emphasize enough just how much more invigorating AMG’s latest performance hero is to drive. It operates on a much higher level than its predecessor, in terms of performance and overall dynamic prowess. With the M3 waiting in the wings, the scene is now set for a battle royal."

http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl.../70702012/1024

Phoenix 21st · 07-10-2007, 07:24 AM

IMO it is not as nice looking as the M3. The front looks like a vauxhall astra.

13eastie · 07-10-2007, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix 21st

IMO it is not as nice looking as the M3. The front looks like a vauxhall astra.

Very difficult to take much interest in a car that ugly.

aerisolphaln · 07-10-2007, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix 21st

IMO it is not as nice looking as the M3. The front looks like a vauxhall astra.

I think it looks far better than any M3 sedan I've seen, and perhaps better than the e92 M3.

RandyB · 07-10-2007, 07:47 AM

Nice Hyundai.

hks786 · 07-10-2007, 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aerisolphaln

I think it looks far better than any M3 sedan I've seen, and perhaps better than the e92 M3.

Well I dunno if it looks better than the E90 or E92 sedan, but in my opinion, it looks stunning !

DrewKo · 07-10-2007, 07:54 AM

I would hit it.

devo · 07-10-2007, 08:01 AM

Not a bad car. It's not as sport oriented as the M3. Just the fact that it only comes with a boring automatic is enough for me not to go that route. And, I am quite confident that the price will be much, much higher than the M with a much worse residual. As a daily driver, sports sedan meant to be a cruise missile, it's a great choice, imo.

kishg · 07-10-2007, 08:12 AM

frontal/side angle view looks like an acura tl with a mercedes grill. plus auto only? no thanks. probably a nice a-bahn stormer though..

mudd786 · 07-10-2007, 08:14 AM

i think its gonna get good reviews as expectations were low so when it was driven it was punching as they say above its weight so it was surprisingly good for the test driver, but looking at the setup of chasis and suspension they seem to be following M ingredients but with more fat in the engine department!, its slightly more expensive i saw in a uk mag article its going to be around £55K base price, but it seems like audi and MB getting there act together, its going to be very very competative

nusevad · 07-10-2007, 10:05 AM

The new front looks pretty menacing as much as its new engine. This car is going to be a success with the old MB fans and some new ones.

GregW / Oregon · 07-10-2007, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FifthStreetz

The new front looks pretty menacing as much as its new engine. This car is going to be a success with the old MB fans and some new ones.

Agree--too bad they can't get off the auto tranny kick and offer a DCT. It will definitely be more expensive than the M3, judgining by other AMG prices.

!Xoible · 07-10-2007, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix 21st

IMO it is not as nice looking as the M3. The front looks like a vauxhall astra.

it's different for sure, which is good. i'd take the M3 over it until im 30 or 35. then i'd pick this over the M3.. you know what i mean?

hks786 · 07-10-2007, 10:29 AM

Here's another review:

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...amg/index.html

nusevad · 07-10-2007, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregW / Oregon

Agree--too bad they can't get off the auto tranny kick and offer a DCT. It will definitely be more expensive than the M3, judgining by other AMG prices.

Yea seriously, MB def. has the resources to develop a great MT or even a DCT type tranny, yet they just recycle their automatics. The only mt i remember was for the c230 kompressor...why cant they make those for AMGs? I guess as with all MB its the ease/comfort of the ride that comes first.

Damage Inc · 07-10-2007, 11:04 AM

I think it looks pretty damn hot

The M3 is becomming a bit more smooth, stylish. This and the RS4 have the "chunky", steriod beefy look I liked in the E46 M3.

M3 = more sport, track duty, engaged spirited driving
C63 = if I have to drive around clients + kids, lots of highway driving, nice M5 alternative

Both serve their purpose, both fantastic choices. What a great time to be an enthusiast, eh?

gtb75 · 07-10-2007, 11:07 AM

As much as I'm very much against automatic transmissions (see my signature), I feel I'd be remiss if I bought an E90 M3 without at least looking at the C63 first. Even though it's heavier than the M3 and has the automatic, everything I've been reading is generally positive and I really think MB might actually have something here. If it comes out at $63K (as stated in the article) and the automatic is as responsive as some have said, it might be a contender...

Hans Delbruck · 07-10-2007, 11:32 AM

I like the way it looks.....

The front end is pretty sweet.

And a 6.2 V8 that will spin the tires in the 1st three gears isn't bad either... !

M3 · 07-10-2007, 11:34 AM

benz is getting there... to audi's level lol

Hans Delbruck · 07-10-2007, 11:35 AM

I imagine with intake, tuning and maybe exhaust work, this engine will produce the 507HP it does in the E63, as well.......

13eastie · 07-10-2007, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mantisG35

it's different for sure, which is good. i'd take the M3 over it until im 30 or 35. then i'd pick this over the M3.. you know what i mean?

30 or 35, eh? Are there really M3 owners who are THAT OLD!!!

M3 · 07-10-2007, 11:56 AM

When I'm that old I would rather get an m5.

07-10-2007, 07:17 AM	#1
hks786 Major General 2165 Rep 5,364 Posts Drives: * Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: UK iTrader: (0)	C63 AMG - Autoweek Review "We won’t see the C63 on these shores until next spring, and prices haven’t been set. We can’t emphasize enough just how much more invigorating AMG’s latest performance hero is to drive. It operates on a much higher level than its predecessor, in terms of performance and overall dynamic prowess. With the M3 waiting in the wings, the scene is now set for a battle royal." http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl.../70702012/1024 Attached Images __________________
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

07-10-2007, 07:24 AM	#2
Phoenix 21st First Lieutenant 19 Rep 325 Posts Drives: E92 M3 M-dct SG Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: London iTrader: (0)	IMO it is not as nice looking as the M3. The front looks like a vauxhall astra.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 07:47 AM	#5
RandyB Lieutenant Colonel 20 Rep 1,504 Posts Drives: '03 330i, '09 M3 Coupe Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Texas iTrader: (0)	Nice Hyundai.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 07:54 AM	#7
DrewKo Lieutenant Colonel 44 Rep 1,568 Posts Drives: 335i Montego Blue Saddle Brown Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Atlanta, GA iTrader: (4) Garage List 2007 335i [0.00]	I would hit it.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 08:01 AM	#8
devo Colonel 755 Rep 2,736 Posts Drives: Bimmers & Porsches Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Atlanta iTrader: (0)	Not a bad car. It's not as sport oriented as the M3. Just the fact that it only comes with a boring automatic is enough for me not to go that route. And, I am quite confident that the price will be much, much higher than the M with a much worse residual. As a daily driver, sports sedan meant to be a cruise missile, it's a great choice, imo.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 08:12 AM	#9
kishg Private First Class 1 Rep 188 Posts Drives: 2003 540i/6 Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Northern NJ iTrader: (0)	frontal/side angle view looks like an acura tl with a mercedes grill. plus auto only? no thanks. probably a nice a-bahn stormer though.. __________________ '05 X5/3.0 Sport (E53) '03 540i/6 M-Sport (E39) '91 325i/5 Sport Package (E30) BMWCCA #360858 SCCA# 374179 NASA # 128290
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 08:14 AM	#10
mudd786 Private 2 Rep 52 Posts Drives: M3 E36 Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Lancashire, UK iTrader: (0)	i think its gonna get good reviews as expectations were low so when it was driven it was punching as they say above its weight so it was surprisingly good for the test driver, but looking at the setup of chasis and suspension they seem to be following M ingredients but with more fat in the engine department!, its slightly more expensive i saw in a uk mag article its going to be around £55K base price, but it seems like audi and MB getting there act together, its going to be very very competative
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 10:05 AM	#11
nusevad O! So Sour!! 552 Rep 15,615 Posts Drives: Fast 240z / Slow M3 Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: 'Merica! iTrader: (24) Garage List 1971 Datsun 240z [0.00] 2008 M3 [9.60]	The new front looks pretty menacing as much as its new engine. This car is going to be a success with the old MB fans and some new ones.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 10:29 AM	#14
hks786 Major General 2165 Rep 5,364 Posts Drives: * Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: UK iTrader: (0)	Here's another review: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...amg/index.html Attached Images __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 11:04 AM	#16
Damage Inc Lieutenant Colonel 789 Rep 1,924 Posts Drives: 2017 M2 Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Nashville iTrader: (1)	I think it looks pretty damn hot The M3 is becomming a bit more smooth, stylish. This and the RS4 have the "chunky", steriod beefy look I liked in the E46 M3. M3 = more sport, track duty, engaged spirited driving C63 = if I have to drive around clients + kids, lots of highway driving, nice M5 alternative Both serve their purpose, both fantastic choices. What a great time to be an enthusiast, eh? __________________ Current: 17 OG M2 / R8 Performance Past Performance Cars: 01 M3, 05 M3, 06 M5, 08 M6, 08 M3, 11 M3, 13 M3, 15 M3, 911 C4S, 911 GTS, 17 M2,R8 V8, R8 RWS Last edited by Damage Inc; 07-10-2007 at 11:05 AM.. Reason: misspelling
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 11:07 AM	#17
gtb75 Private 9 Rep 95 Posts Drives: 2006 Corvette Z06 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: IL, USA iTrader: (0)	As much as I'm very much against automatic transmissions (see my signature), I feel I'd be remiss if I bought an E90 M3 without at least looking at the C63 first. Even though it's heavier than the M3 and has the automatic, everything I've been reading is generally positive and I really think MB might actually have something here. If it comes out at $63K (as stated in the article) and the automatic is as responsive as some have said, it might be a contender... __________________ 2006 Corvette Z06 Black / Ebony - 459RWHP / 438RWTQ 2005 Subaru Legacy 2.5 GT Wagon Brilliant Silver / Tweed M5 - 229AWHP / 260AWTQ
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 11:32 AM	#18
Hans Delbruck Major 75 Rep 1,288 Posts Drives: C63, 135i, Evo FE, GLE63 Join Date: May 2005 Location: Huntington Beach, CA iTrader: (0)	I like the way it looks..... The front end is pretty sweet. And a 6.2 V8 that will spin the tires in the 1st three gears isn't bad either... !
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 11:34 AM	#19
M3 ///M3 42 Rep 348 Posts Drives: M3 Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Atlanta, GA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2022 BMW M3 [0.00]	benz is getting there... to audi's level lol
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 11:35 AM	#20
Hans Delbruck Major 75 Rep 1,288 Posts Drives: C63, 135i, Evo FE, GLE63 Join Date: May 2005 Location: Huntington Beach, CA iTrader: (0)	I imagine with intake, tuning and maybe exhaust work, this engine will produce the 507HP it does in the E63, as well.......
	Appreciate 0 Quote

07-10-2007, 11:56 AM	#22
M3 ///M3 42 Rep 348 Posts Drives: M3 Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Atlanta, GA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2022 BMW M3 [0.00]	When I'm that old I would rather get an m5.
	Appreciate 0 Quote